Skip to main content
Log in

Total transvaginal endoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair: a NOTES survival study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypothesis Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has gained widespread interest as a potentially less invasive alternative to laparoscopic surgery or, else, an evolution as the next-generation surgery. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety of transluminal abdominal wall hernia repair for potential human application by specifically investigating the feasibility and challenges of using a transvaginal approach. Design NOTES ventral hernia repair via a transvaginal approach. Setting University Hospital (National University Health System, Singapore). Participants The study utilized five female pigs (30–40 kg) between 5 and 7 months of age, which underwent abdominal wall hernia repair using a transvaginal approach. Intervention The procedures were performed using a double-channel endoscope under general endotracheal anesthesia. A mesh was placed and fixed to the abdominal wall using standard laparoscopic and endoscopic equipment. The animals survived for 2 weeks and were then euthanized and a necropsy performed. Main outcome measures To assess the safety and feasibility of NOTES ventral hernia repair in a survival experimental model. Results All of the procedures could be safely performed using the standard equipment. At the necropsy, all meshes were well in place and mild adhesions were recorded in one animal with a small abscess in the subcutaneous area. Conclusion This novel approach seems technically challenging but feasible using equipment and accessories currently available for conventional laparoscopic and interventional endoscopy with low intra-abdominal contamination and sepsis. New procedure-specific instruments and equipment need to be developed to allow the surgeon safer access and more degrees of instrument freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J et al (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov 13(2):86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kantsevoy SV, Hu B, Jagannath SB et al (2006) Transgastric endoscopic splenectomy: is it possible? Surg Endosc 20:522–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC (2006) Survival studies after endoscopic transgastric oophorectomy and tubectomy in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 63:473–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rattner D, Hawes RH (2006) NOTES: gathering momentum. Gastrointest Endosc 63:838–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S et al (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142(9):823–826; discussion 826–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hochberger J, Lamadé W (2005) Transgastric surgery in the abdomen: the dawn of a new era? Gastrointest Endosc 62:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA et al (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME et al (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lomanto D, Chua H, So JBY et al (2008) Microbial contamination of the peritoneum is common following transgastric endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(1):S241

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zühlke HV, Lorenz EMP, Straub EM et al (1990) Pathophysiologie und Klassifikation von Adhäsionen. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 345:1009–1016

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu MK et al (2008) Hybrid natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model. Surg Endosc 22(8):1798–1802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swain P (2008) Nephrectomy and natural orifice translumenal endoscopy (NOTES): transvaginal, transgastric, transrectal, and transvesical approaches. J Endourol 22(4):811–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Lomanto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lomanto, D., Dhir, U., So, J.B.Y. et al. Total transvaginal endoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair: a NOTES survival study. Hernia 13, 415–419 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0485-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0485-2

Keywords

Navigation