Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/aim

Incisional hernia is one of the major elements of morbidity after abdominal surgery, with high incidence in vertical midline abdominal incisions. However, the risk of developing an incisional hernia can be increased due to the patient’s related factors; therefore, more consideration has to be given to the choice of incision, wound closure and wound healing to protect against incisional hernia, especially in high-risk patients. In this study, we used prophylactic subfascial non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of midline closure in high-risk patients to detect whether fixing the wound with mesh is risky on a short-term basis and whether it is protective on a long-term basis.

Patients and methods

From October 2000 to December 2002, 40 high-risk patients liable to develop postoperative incisional hernia underwent elective abdominal operations through midline abdominal incisions at the Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Laparoscopic Unit, Tanta University Hospital, Egypt. They were randomly divided into two groups; group A: patients for whom the midline abdominal incisions were closed by conventional method and reinforced by subfascial polypropylene mesh (20 patients); and group B: patients for whom the midline abdominal incisions were closed by conventional method only (20 patients) with a follow up period of more than 20 months.

Results

There was no significant difference (P = 0.075) in both groups regarding the age, sex and the average risk factor. Twenty-three patients (57.5%) presented with more than one risk factor (11 in group A and 12 in group B). The upper midline abdominal incisions were reported in 33 patients (19 upper and 14 extended upper). There was no significant difference between the overall local and systemic complications in both groups (P = 0.4082). However, the subcutaneous seroma and chronic wound pain were greater in patients with prophylactic mesh than those without mesh. One group A patients (5%) and three group B patients (15%) developed postoperative incisional hernia during the follow up period.

Conclusion

Prophylactic subfascial non-absorbable mesh reinforcement of midline closure in high-risk patients can be used safely and effectively to provide extrinsic strength of the wound without relying too much on the defective development of its own intrinsic strength and to prevent subsequent incisional hernia. There was no risk in the use of the mesh regarding local and systemic complication. However, the final statement should await the outcomes of the long-term follow up of the studied cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martín-Duce A, Noguerales F, Villeta R, Hernández P, Lozano O, Keller J, Granell J (2001) Modifications to Rives technique for midline incisional hernia repair. Hernia 5:70–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards PC, Balch CM, Aldrete JS (1983) Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques. Ann Surg 197:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallup DG, Talledo OE, King LA (1989) Primary mass closure of midline incisions with a continuous running monofilament suture in gynecologic patients. Obstet Gynecol 73:675–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gislason H, Grønbech JE, Søreide O (1995) Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations—comparison of three closure techniques. Eur J Surg 161:349–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christou NV, Jarand J, Sylvestre JL, McLean APH (2004) Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for wound infections in open bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 14:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koniaris LG, Hendrickson RJ, Drugas G, Abt P, Schoeniger LO (2001) Dynamic retention: a technique for closure of the complex abdomen in critically ill patients. Arch Surg 130:1359–1363

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J (1987) Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg 74:738–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrahamson J (1997) Postoperative ventral abdominal hernia, Chap. 11. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H (eds) Maingot’s abdominal operation, 10th edn. Stanford, Appleton and Lange, pp 479–580

    Google Scholar 

  10. Albina JE (1994) Nutrition and wound healing. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 18:367–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelman CI, Robert FD, Dome RY, Graham M, Marcy C (2002) Wound healing, Chap. 8. In: Schwartz SI, Tom GS, Spencer FC, Daly JM, Fischer JE, Galloway AC (eds) Principles of surgery, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 263–297

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 6:392–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutiérrez de la Peña C, Medina Achirica C, Domínguez-Adame E, Medina Díez J (2003) Primary closure of laparotomies with high risk of incisional hernia using prosthetic material: analysis of usefulness. Hernia 7:134–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagh PV, Read RC (1971) Collagen deficiency in rectus sheath of patients with inguinal herniation. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 137:382–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mason EE, Renquist KE, Jiang D (1992) Perioperative risks and safety of surgery for severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55:573–576

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barber GR, Miransky J, Brown AE, Coit DG, Lewis FM, Thaler HT, Kiehn TE, Armstrong D (1995) Direct observations of surgical wound infections at a comprehensive cancer center. Arch Surg 130:1042–1047

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP (1992) The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med 326:281–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaffer D, Benotti PN, Bothe A Jr, Jenkins RL, Blackburn GL (1987) A prospective, randomized trial of abdominal wound drainage in gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg 206:134–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kozol RA, Fromm D, Ackerman NB, Chung R (1986) Wound closure in obese patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162:442–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miransky J, Ruo L, Nicoletta S, Eagan J, Sepkowitz K, Margetson N, Thaler H, Cohen AM, Guillem JG (2001) Impact of a surgeon-trained observer on accuracy of colorectal surgical site infection rates. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1100–1105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poole GV Jr (1985) Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence. Surgery 97:631–640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yale CE (1989) Gastric surgery for morbid obesity. Complications and long-term weight control. Arch Surg 124:941–946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brolin RE (1996) Prospective, randomized evaluation of midline fascial closure in gastric bariatric operations. Am J Surg 172:328–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pories WJ, MacDonald KG Jr, Flickinger EG, Dohm GL, Sinha MK, Barakat HA, May HJ, Khazanie P, Swanson MS, Morgan E, Leggett-Frazier N, Long SD, Brown BM, O’Brien K, Caro FJ (1992) Is type II diabetes (NIDDM) mellitus a surgical disease? Ann Surg 215:633–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Irvin TT, Vassilakis JS, Chattopadhyay DK, Greaney MG (1978) Abdominal wound healing in jaundiced patients. Br J Surg 65:521–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen H, Lange R, Erhard J, Malagó M, Eigler FW, Broelsch CE (2002) Causative factors, surgical treatment and outcome of incisional hernia after liver transplantation. Br J Surg 89:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1997) Overweight and healing of midline incisions: the importance of suture technique. Eur J Surg 163:175–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arribas D, Elía M, Artigas C, Jiménez A, Aguilella V, Martínez M (2004) Incidence of incisional hernia following vertical banded gastroplasty. Hernia 8:135–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lamont PM, Ellis H (1988) Incisional hernia in re-opened abdominal incisions: an overlooked risk factor. Br J Surg 75:374–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Raftery AT (1973) Regeneration of parietal and visceral peritoneum. A light microscopical study. Br J Surg 60:293–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Raftery AT (1979) Regeneration of peritoneum: a fibrinolytic study. J Anat 129:659–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Strzelczyk J, Czupryniak L, Loba J, Wasiak J (2002) The use of polypropylene mesh in midline incision closure following gastric by-pass surgery reduces the risk of postoperative hernia. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:294–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Gastroenterology and Laparoscopic Unit, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt

    O. H. El-Khadrawy, G. Moussa, O. Mansour & M. S. Hashish

  2. Department of Surgery, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt

    M. S. Hashish

Authors
  1. O. H. El-Khadrawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Moussa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. O. Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. S. Hashish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Hashish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Khadrawy, O.H., Moussa, G., Mansour, O. et al. Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients. Hernia 13, 267–274 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation