Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term sequelae after 1,311 primary inguinal hernia repairs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Aim of this study was to analyze long-term sequelae, risk factors, and satisfaction after inguinal hernia primary repair.

Methods

A postal questionnaire was mailed to all patients operated between January 1997 and December 2004 for inguinal hernia repair. Patients who had a lump in the groin and patients who experienced chronic problems were invited for a physical examination. Patients who reported having chronic pain were asked to fill out the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).

Results

Chronic pain was present in 18.1% of cases. The strongest risk factors were presence of recurrence, use of heavyweight mesh, and age younger than 66 years. By means of the SF-MPQ, we found that the pain reported by most patients was sensory–discriminative in quality, with “tender” and “aching” being the most common descriptors used. About 71.3% of replies used descriptors typical of nociceptive pain, 8.9% of neuropathic pain, and 19.8% of nociceptive plus neuropathic. Chronic pain was severe in 2.1% of patients and interfered with normal activities, work, and exercise. The cumulative recurrence rate was 2.1%. There was a strong correlation between lump and recurrence. Patients declared themselves satisfied with the result of the operation in 93.1% of cases. Due to chronic pain, 6.5% of patients were unsatisfied.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the main problem after inguinal hernia repair remains chronic pain, which was the primary reason of dissatisfaction. The SF-MPQ is feasible and easy to administer to all patients and provides important information about qualitative features of the pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 1:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WCS (2001) Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 88:1122–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillion JF, Fagniez PL (1999) Chronic pain and cutaneous sensory changes after inguinal hernia repair: comparison between open and laparoscopic techniques. Hernia 3:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Cairns W, Smith S, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberod A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg 163:823–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liem MSL, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJMV, on behalf of the Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sondenaa K, Nesvik I, Breivik K, Korner H (2001) Long-term follow-up of 1059 consecutive primary and recurrent inguinal hernias in a teaching hospital. Eur J Surg 167:125–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spange L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwab JR, Beaird DA, Ramshaw BJ, Franklin JS, Duncan TD, Wilson RA, Miller J, Mason EM (2002) After 10 years and 1903 inguinal hernias, what is the outcome for the laparoscopic repair? Surg Endosc 16:1201–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10:309–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 investigators (2004) Open versus mesh repair of inguinal hernia. NEJM 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandblom G, Gruber G, Kald A, Nilsson E (2000) Audit and recurrence rates after hernia surgery. Eur J Surg 166:154–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haapaniemi S, Nilsson E (2002) Recurrence and pain three years after groin hernia repair. Validation of postal questionnaire and selective physical examination as a method of follow-up. Eur J Surg 168:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vos PM, Simons MP, Luitse JSK, van Geldere D, Koelemaij MJW, Obertop H (1998) Follow-up after inguinal hernia repair. Questionnaire compared with physical examination: a prospective study in 299 patients. Eur J Surg 164:533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kald A, Nilsson E, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Engström P, Gunnarsson U, Haapaniemi S, Lindhagen J, Nilsson P, Sandblom G, Stubberöd A (1998) Reoperation as surrogate endpoint in hernia surgery. A three year follow-up of 1565 herniorrhaphies. Eur J Surg 164:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Melzack R (1975) The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McCarthy M, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, Gibbs J, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L (2005) Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg 201:245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Melzack R (1987) The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 30:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grafton KV, Foster NE, Wright CC, Math M (2005) Test-retest reliability of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients and limits of agreement in patients with osteoarthritis. Clin J Pain 21:73–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dudgeon D, Raubertas RF, Rosenthal SN (1993) The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 8:191–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wright KD, Asmundson JG, McCreary DR (2001) Factorial validity of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Eur J Pain 5:279–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson E (1995) Audit of groin hernia repair. In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE (eds) Hernia. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 83–87

  26. Harris RE, Gracely RH, McLean SA, Williams DA, Giesecke T, Petzke F, Sen A, Clauw DJ (2006) Comparison of clinical and evoked pain measures in fibromyalgia. J Pain 7:521–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Callesen T, Bech K, Nielsen R, Andersen J, Hesselfeldt P, Roikjaer O, Kehlet H (1998) Pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 85:1412–1414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:333–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leibl BJ, Däubler P, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Bittner R (2000) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87:780–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Oberg E, Jacobsen B, Rosenberg J (2005) Chronic pain and recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15:267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moore AK, Vilderman S, Lubenskyi W, McCans J, Fox GS (1990) Differences in epidural requirements between elderly and young patients after abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 70:316–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fielding GA (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Aust N Z J Surg 65:304–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study: pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy

    S. Massaron, S. Bona, U. Fumagalli, P. Valente & R. Rosati

  2. Department of Surgical Science, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    R. Rosati

Authors
  1. S. Massaron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Bona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Fumagalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Valente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Rosati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Massaron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massaron, S., Bona, S., Fumagalli, U. et al. Long-term sequelae after 1,311 primary inguinal hernia repairs. Hernia 12, 57–63 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0277-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0277-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation