Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In patients with postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection, extensive visceral oedema often necessitates mechanical containment of bowel. Prosthetic mesh is often used for this purpose. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety of the use of non-absorbable and absorbable meshes for this purpose.

Method

All patients that had undergone mesh repair of abdominal wound dehiscence between January 1988 and January 1998 in the presence of intra-abdominal infection were included in a retrospective cohort study. All surviving patients had physical follow-up in February 2001.

Result

Eighteen patients were included in the study. Meshes consisted of polyglactin (n = 6), polypropylene (n = 8), polyester (n = 1), or a combination of a polypropylene mesh with a polyglactin mesh on the visceral side (n = 3). All patients developed complications, consisting mainly of mesh infection (77%), intra-abdominal abscess (17%), enterocutaneous fistula (17%), or mesh migration through the bowel (11%). Mesh removal was necessary in eight patients (44%). Within four months postoperatively, six patients (33%) had died because of progressive abdominal sepsis. The incidence of progressive abdominal sepsis was significantly higher in the group with absorbable polyglactin mesh than in the group with nonabsorbable mesh (67 vs. 11%, p = 0.02) After a mean follow-up of 49 months, 63% of the surviving patients had developed incisional hernia. Absorbable meshes did not yield better outcomes than nonabsorbable meshes in terms of complications and mortality rate.

Conclusion

Synthetic graft placement in the presence of intra-abdominal infection has a high risk of complications, regardless of whether absorbable (polyglactin) or non-absorbable mesh material (polypropylene or polyester) is used, and should be avoided if possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riou JPA, Cohen JR, Johnson H (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 163:324–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muckart JM, Luvuno FM (1985). Abdominal wound disruption. J R Coll Surg 30:47–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Van ‘t Riet M, De Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J (2004) Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors. Am Surg 70:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  4. Voyles CR, Richardson JD, Bland KI, Tobin GR, Flint LM, Polk HC (1981) Emergency abdominal wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh. Ann Surg 194:219–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone HH, Fabian TC, Turkleson ML, Jurkiewicz MJ (1981) Management of acute full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Ann Surg 193:612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd WC (1977) Use of Marlex mesh in acute loss of the abdominal wall due to infection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 144:251–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wouters DB, Krom RAF, Slooff MJH (1983) The use of Marlex mesh in patients with generalized peritonitis and multiple organ system failure. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156:909–914

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buck JR, Fath JJ, Siu-Keung Chung MPH, Sorensen VJ, Horst HM, Obeid FN (1995) Use of absorbable mesh as an aid in abdominal wall closure in the emergent setting. Am Surg 61:655–658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Porter JM. (1995) A combination of Vicryl and Marlex mesh: a technique for abdominal wall closure in difficult cases. J Trauma 39:1178–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dayton MT, Buchele BA, Shirazi SS, Hunt LB (1986) Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal wall defects. Arch Surg 121:954–960

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene MA, Mullins RJ, Malangoni MS, Feliciano PD, Richardson JD, Polk HC Jr (1993) Laparotomy wound closure with absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 176:213–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mc Neeley SG jr, Hendrix SL, Bennett SM, Singh A, Ransom SB, Kmak DC, Morley GW (1998) Synthetic graft placement in the treatment of fascial dehiscence with necrosis and infection. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 179:1430–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brandt CP, McHenry CR, Jacobs DG, Piotrowski JJ, Priebe PP (1995) Polypropylene mesh closure after emergency laparotomy: morbidity and outcome. Surgery 118:736–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Turkcapar AG, Yerdel MA, Aydinuraz K, Bayar S, Kuterdem E (1998) Repair of midline incisional hernias using polypropylene grafts. Surg Today 28:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendrick JH, Casali RE, Lang NP, Read RC (1982) The complicated septic abdominal wound. Arch Surg 117:464–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilsdorf RB, Shea MM (1975). Repair of massive septic abdominal wall defects with Marlex mesh. Am J Surg 130:634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones JW, Jurkovich GJ (1989) Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds. Am Surg 55:73–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagy KK, Fildes JJ, Mahr C, Roberts RR, Frosner SM, Joseph KT, Barrett J (1996) Experience with three prosthetic materials in temporary abdominal wall closure. Am Surg 62: 331–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Emmink B, Thomson SR, Moodley M, Muckart DJJ (1993) Laparotomy closure using perisplenic polyglactin mesh. J R Coll Surg Edinb 38:177–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levasseur JC, Lehn E, Rignier P (1979) Repair of extensive eviscerations using an absorbable prosthesis. J Chir 116:737–739

    Google Scholar 

  21. Osther PJ, Gjode P, Mortensen BB, Mortensen PB, Bartholin J, Gottup F (1995) Randomized comparion of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg 82:1080–1082

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stol DW (1978) De invloed van hechtmaterial of de wondgenezing. Thesis, Davids Decor, Alblasserdam

  23. Wissing JC (1988) Het sluitstuk van de laparotomie. Een proscpectief gerandomiseerd multicentre onderzoek naar de resultaten van fasciesluiting. Thesis, Helmond, Wibrodissertatiedrukkerij

    Google Scholar 

  24. Koniaris LG, Hendrickson RJ, Drugas G, Abt P, Schoeniger LO (2001) Dynamic retention. A technique for closure of the complex abdomen in critically ill patients. Arch Surg 136:1359–1363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghimenton F, Thomson SR, Muckart DJ, Burrows R (2000) Abdominal content containment: practicalities and outcome. Br J Surg 87:106–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith PC, Tweddell JS, Bessey PQ (1992) Alternative approaches to abdominal wound closure in severely injured patients with massive visceral edema. J Trauma 32:16–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bender JS, Bailey CE, Saxe JM, Ledgerwood AM, Lucas CE (1994). The technique of visceral packing: recommended management of difficult fascial closure in trauma patients. J Trauma 36:182–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sherck J, Seiver A, Shateney C, Oakes D, Cobb L (1998) Covering the open abdomen: a better technique. Am Surg 64:854–857

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Miller PR, Thompson JT, Flaer BJ, Meredith JW, Chang MC (2002) Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma 53:843–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Erdmann D, Drye C, Heller LBSN, Wong MS, Levin LS (2001) Abdominal wall defect and enterocutaneous fistula treatment with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC system). Plast Reconst Surg 108:2066–2068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, Gagliardi S, Di Saverio S, D’Alessandro L, Pinna AD (2007) Use of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia 11:57–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Alaedeen DI, Lipman J, Medalie D, Rosen MJ (2007) The single-staged approach to the surgical management of abdominal wall hernias in contaminated fields. Hernia 11:41–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patton JH Jr, Berry S, Kralovich KA (2007) Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. Am J Surg 193:360–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M. van’t Riet, P. J. de Vos van Steenwijk, H. J. Bonjer, E. W. Steyerberg & J. Jeekel

Authors
  1. M. van’t Riet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. J. de Vos van Steenwijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. J. Bonjer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. W. Steyerberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Jeekel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jeekel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van’t Riet, M., van Steenwijk, P.J.d., Bonjer, H.J. et al. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh?. Hernia 11, 409–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0240-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0240-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation