Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative evaluation of abdominal wall perfusion after different types of laparotomy closure using laser-fluorescence videography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Laparotomy closure relies on the incisional edges as anchor for the suture material. The results of these techniques are not satisfying, with failure rates of up to 20%. To investigate the effect of different conventional closure techniques and a novel "bridging technique" on abdominal wall perfusion an animal study was performed in rabbits. Abdominal wall perfusion was measured using the method of dynamic laser-fluorescence videography in the first 72 h of incisional wound healing in 25 animals. Suture tension was controlled with a water-filled polyurethane balloon connected to a pressure detector. The effect of laparotomy closure on abdominal wall tissue perfusion depends significantly on the applied technique and suture tension. Avoiding direct sutures in the incisional edges during laparotomy closure leads to a better tissue perfusion of the incisional region than conventional suture techniques. Suture tension can be controlled and adjusted using a water-filled polyurethane balloon as a pressure sensor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höer, J., Töns, C., Schachtrupp, A. et al. Quantitative evaluation of abdominal wall perfusion after different types of laparotomy closure using laser-fluorescence videography. Hernia 6, 11–16 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0047-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-002-0047-3

Navigation