Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Herbaceous Understorey: An Overlooked Player in Forest Landscape Dynamics?

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dense herbaceous understorey layers can impact tree regeneration and thereby affect forest succession. However, the implications of this interaction on large spatial and temporal scales are not well understood. To analyse the role of overstorey–understorey interactions for forest dynamics, we implemented an understorey layer (composed of the plant functional types grasses, forbs, ferns, herbs and shrubs) in the forest landscape model LandClim, focusing on competition for light as the main mode of interaction. The model was used to simulate post-disturbance dynamics over an elevational gradient of 560–2800 m a.s.l. in Central Europe. Simulation results showed strong impacts of the herbaceous understorey on tree regeneration within the first decades, but generally little effect on late-successional forests, i.e. not providing any evidence for ‘arrested’ succession. The results also demonstrated varying overstorey–understorey interactions across the landscape: strongest effects were found at low to mid elevations of the study landscapes, where tree establishment was substantially delayed. At high elevations, tree growth and establishment were more limited by low temperatures, and the effect of light competition from the understorey was negligible. Although the inclusion of large windthrow disturbances increased the biomass of herbaceous understorey across the landscape, this had only a small impact on the overstorey due to the presence of advance regeneration of trees. Overall, our results demonstrate that the herbaceous understorey can have a significant impact for forest landscape dynamics through light competition, and that non-woody plants should not be neglected in forest modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaback PB. 1982. Dynamics of understory biomass in Sitka spruce-western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska. Ecology 63:1932–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaback PB. 1984. Plant succession following logging in the Sitka spruce—western hemlock forests of southeast Alaska: implications for management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. Oregon State University.

  • Allen CD. 2007. Interactions across spatial scales among forest dieback, fire, and erosion in northern New Mexico landscapes. Ecosystems 10:797–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balandier P, Collet C, Miller JH, Reynolds PE, Zedaker SM. 2006. Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation. Forestry 79:3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogenrieder A, Rasbach H. 1982. Der Feldberg im Schwarzwald: subalpine Insel im Mittelgebirge. Karlsruhe: Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg; Institut für Oekologie und Naturschutz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann H. 2001. A review of forest gap models. Clim Change 51:259–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecol Monogr 70:171–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Crisafulli CM, Swanson FJ. 2005. 25 years of ecological change at Mount St. Helens. Science 308:961–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de la Cretaz AL, Kelty MJ. 1999. Establishment and control of hay-scented fern: a native invasive species. Biol Invasions 1:223–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Cretaz AL, Kelty MJ. 2002. Development of tree regeneration in fern-dominated forest understories after reduction of deer browsing. Restor Ecol 10:416–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long JR, Kardol P, Sundqvist MK, Veen GF, Wardle DA. 2015. Plant growth response to direct and indirect temperature effects varies by vegetation type and elevation in a subarctic tundra. Oikos 124:772–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DenOuden J. 2000. The role of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) in forest dynamics. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, Ph.D. Netherlands: Wageningen University.

  • Dolling AHU. 1996. Interference of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum L Kuhn) with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L Karst) seedling establishment. For Ecol Manag 88:227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Ulmer. p 1096p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A. 1999. Die Entwicklung von Wald-Biozönosen nach Sturmwurf. Weinheim: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frehner M, Wasser B, Schwitter R. 2005. Nachhaltigkeit im Schutzwald (Projekt NaiS) - Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU. Bern.

  • George LO, Bazzaz FA. 1999a. The fern understory as an ecological filter: emergence and establishment of canopy-tree seedlings. Ecology 80:833–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George LO, Bazzaz FA. 1999b. The fern understory as an ecological filter: growth and survival of canopy-tree seedlings. Ecology 80:846–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George LO, Bazzaz FA. 2003. The herbaceous layer as a filter determining spatial pattern in forest tree regeneration. In: Gilliam FSR, Eds. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 265–82.

  • Gilliam FS. 2007. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57:845–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SA, Chen HYH. 2006. Understory vegetation dynamics of North American boreal forests. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:381–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henne PD, Elkin C, Colombaroli D, Samartin S, Bugmann H, Heiri O, Tinner W. 2013. Impacts of changing climate and land use on vegetation dynamics in a Mediterranean ecosystem: insights from paleoecology and dynamic modeling. Landsc Ecol 28:819–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickler T, Vohland K, Feehan J, Miller PA, Smith B, Costa L, Giesecke T, Fronzek S, Carter TR, Cramer W, Kuhn I, Sykes MT. 2012. Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiltbrunner E, Aerts R, Bühlmann T, Huss-Danell K, Magnusson B, Myrold DD, Reed SC, Sigurdsson BD, Körner C. 2014. Ecological consequences of the expansion of N-2-fixing plants in cold biomes. Oecologia 176:11–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horsley S. 1993. Mechanisms of interference between hay-scented fern and black-cherry. Can J For Res 23:2059–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, Eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jules MJ, Sawyer JO, Jules ES. 2008. Assessing the relationships between stand development and understory vegetation using a 420-year chronosequence. For Ecol Manag 255:2384–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellomäki S, Väisänen H. 1991. Application of a gap model for the simulation of forest ground vegetation in boreal conditions. For Ecol Manag 42:35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop H, Hilgen P. 1987. Forest dynamics and regeneration mosaic shifts in unexploited beech (Fagus-Sylvatica) stands at Fontainebleau (France). For Ecol Manag 20:135–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalenko CG. 2003. An evaluation of estimating and indexing methods to simplify the determination of management treatment effects on raspberry yields. Can J Plant Sci 83:141–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer K, Brang P, Bachofen H, Bugmann H, Wohlgemuth T. 2014. Site factors are more important than salvage logging for tree regeneration after wind disturbance in Central European forests. For Ecol Manage 331:116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupferschmid AD, Bugmann H. 2005. Effect of microsites, logs and ungulate browsing on Picea abies regeneration in a mountain forest. For Ecol Manag 205:251–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupferschmid AD, Wasem U, Bugmann H. 2015. Browsing regime and growth response of Abies alba saplings planted along light gradients. Eur J Forest Res 134:75–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent JM, Bar-Hen A, Francois L, Ghislain M, Cheddadi R. 2004. Refining vegetation simulation models: From plant functional types to bioclimatic affinity groups of plants. J Veg Sci 15:739–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li MH, Du Z, Pan HL, Yan CF, Xiao WF, Lei JP. 2012. Effects of neighboring woody plants on target trees with emphasis on effects of understorey shrubs on overstorey physiology in forest communities: a mini-review. Commun Ecol 13:117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieffers V, Macdonald S, Hogg E. 1993. Ecology of and control strategies for Calamagrostis canadensis in boreal forest sites. Can J For Res 23:2070–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire DA, Forman RTT. 1983. Herb cover effects on tree seedling patterns in a mature hemlock-hardwood forest. Ecology 64:1367–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher EL, Germino MJ, Hasselquist NJ. 2005. Interactive effects of tree and herb cover on survivorship, physiology, and microclimate of conifer seedlings at the alpine tree-line ecotone. Can J For Res 35:567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy BC. 2003. The herbaceous layer of eastern old-growth deciduous forests. In: Gilliam FS, Roberts MR, Eds. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. New York: Oxford University Press, pp 163–76.

  • McKenzie D, Raymond CL, Cushman SA. 2009. Modeling understory vegetation and its response to fire. In: Millspaugh JJ, Thompson FR, Eds. Models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. San Diego: Academic Press, pp 391–414.

  • Mladenoff DJ. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol Model 180:7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsi M, Saeki T. 2005. On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Ann Bot 95:549–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs GJ. 1996. Quantification of herb layer dynamics under tree canopy. For Ecol Manag 88:143–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niering W, Goodwin R. 1974. Creation of relatively stable shrublands with herbicides—arresting succession on rights-of-way and pastureland. Ecology 55:784–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto-Lugilde D, Lenoir J, Abdulhak S, Aeschimann D, Dullinger S, Gegout JC, Guisan A, Pauli H, Renaud J, Theurillat JP, Thuiller W, Van Es J, Vittoz P, Willner W, Wohlgemuth T, Zimmermann NE, Svenning JC. 2015. Tree cover at fine and coarse spatial grains interacts with shade tolerance to shape plant species distributions across the Alps. Ecography 38:578–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA. 2005. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front Ecol Environ 3:421–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C. 1981. Forest development in north-America following major disturbances. For Ecol Manag 3:153–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott E, Frehner M, Frey HU, Lüscher P. 1997. Gebirgsnadelwälder: ein praxisorientierter Leitfaden für eine standortgerechte Waldbehandlung. Bern: P. Haupt Verlag. p 288p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman JI. 2000. Absorption of photosynthetically active radiation, radiation use efficiency and spectral reflectance of bracken [Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn] canopies. Ann Bot 85:101–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priewasser K. 2013. Factors influencing tree regeneration after windthrow in Swiss forests. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, Ph.D. Thesis No. 21011. ETH Zurich.

  • Provendier D, Balandier P. 2008. Compared effects of competition by grasses (Graminoids) and broom (Cytisus scoparius) on growth and functional traits of beech saplings (Fagus sylvatica). Ann For Sci 65:510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Raich JW, Russell AE, Vitousek PM. 1997. Primary productivity and ecosystem development along an elevational gradient on Mauna Loa, Hawai’i. Ecology 78:707–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royo AA, Carson WP. 2006. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Can J For Res 36:1345–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royo AA, Carson WP. 2008. Direct and indirect effects of a dense understory on tree seedling recruitment in temperate forests: habitat-mediated predation versus competition. Can J For Res 38:1634–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato H, Itoh A, Kohyama T. 2007. SEIB-DGVM: A new dynamic global vegetation model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach. Ecol Model 200:279–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer U, Reif A. 1999. Entwicklung der Vegetation im überregionalen Vergleich. Fischer A editor. Die Entwicklung von Wald-Biozonosen nach Sturmwurf. Weinheim: Wiley, pp 146–68.

  • Schumacher S. 2004. The role of large-scale disturbances and climate for the dynamics of forested landscapes in the European Alps. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sciences, Ph.D. Thesis No. 15573. ETH Zurich.

  • Schumacher S, Bugmann H, Mladenoff DJ. 2004. Improving the formulation of tree growth and succession in a spatially explicit landscape model. Ecol Model 180:175–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher S, Reineking B, Sibold J, Bugmann H. 2006. Modeling the impact of climate and vegetation on fire regimes in mountain landscapes. Landsc Ecol 21:539–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitter R, Sandri A, Bebi P, Wohlgemuth T, Brang P. 2015. Lehren aus Vivian für den Gebirgswald - im Hinblick auf den nächsten Sturm. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 166:159–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shropshire C, Wagner RG, Bell FW, Swanton CJ. 2001. Light attenuation by early successional plants of the boreal forest. Can J For Res 31:812–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Prentice IC, Sykes MT. 2001. Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:621–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromayer KAK, Warren RJ. 1997. Are overabundant deer herds in the eastern United States creating alternate stable states in forest plant communities? Wildl Soc Bull 25:227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C. 2013. Cross-scale interactions among bark beetles, climate change, and wind disturbances: a landscape modeling approach. Ecol Monogr 83:383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrippleton T, Dolos K, Perry GLW, Groeneveld J, Reineking B. 2014. Simulating long-term vegetation dynamics using a forest landscape model: the post-Taupo succession on Mt Hauhungatahi, North Island, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 38:26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Dale VH, Everham EH. 1997. Fires, hurricanes, and volcanoes: comparing large disturbances. Bioscience 47:758–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker LR, Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Clarkson BD. 2010. The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development. J Ecol 98:725–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg PJ, Bugmann H. 2003. Forest dynamics and ungulate herbivory: from leaf to landscape. For Ecol Manag 181:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg PJ, Hadorn C, Bugmann H. 2003. Predicting understorey vegetation cover from overstorey attributes in two temperate mountain forests. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 122:273–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support by Dominic Michel in all IT-related questions, as well as Laura Schuler and Nica Huber for helpful comments on the discussion section. Furthermore, two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for providing helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Funding for R.S.S. was provided by the EU FP7 project “IMPRESSIONS”, Grant No. 603416.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Systems Science, Forest Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    Timothy Thrippleton, Harald Bugmann & Rebecca S. Snell

  2. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Kathrin Kramer-Priewasser

Authors
  1. Timothy Thrippleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Bugmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kathrin Kramer-Priewasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rebecca S. Snell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Thrippleton.

Additional information

Author Contribution

TT., R.S.S. and H.B. designed the study; T.T. and R.S.S. developed the submodel; T.T. conducted the simulation experiments; K.K-P. contributed data; T.T., H.B., K.K-P. and R.S.S. wrote the paper.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 2665 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thrippleton, T., Bugmann, H., Kramer-Priewasser, K. et al. Herbaceous Understorey: An Overlooked Player in Forest Landscape Dynamics?. Ecosystems 19, 1240–1254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9999-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9999-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation