Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Disturbance Decouples Biogeochemical Cycles Across Forests of the Southeastern US

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biogeochemical cycles are inherently linked through the stoichiometric demands of the organisms that cycle the elements. Landscape disturbance can alter element availability and thus the rates of biogeochemical cycling. Nitrification is a fundamental biogeochemical process positively related to plant productivity and nitrogen loss from soils to aquatic systems, and the rate of nitrification is sensitive to both carbon and nitrogen availability. Yet how these controls influence nitrification rates at the landscape scale is not fully elucidated. We, therefore, sampled ten watersheds with different disturbance histories in the southern Appalachian Mountains to examine effects on potential net nitrification rates. Using linear mixed model selection (AIC), we narrowed a broad suite of putative explanatory variables into a set of models that best explained landscape patterns in potential net nitrification. Forest disturbance history determined whether nitrification and nitrogen mineralization were correlated, with the effect apparently mediated by microbially available carbon. Undisturbed forests had higher available carbon, which uncoupled potential net nitrification from potential net nitrogen mineralization. In contrast, disturbed watersheds had lower available carbon, and nitrification rates were strongly correlated to those of nitrogen mineralization. These data suggest that a history of disturbance at the landscape scale reduces soil carbon availability, which increases ammonium availability to nitrifiers at the micro-scale. Landscape-level soil carbon availability then appears to determine the coupling of autotrophic (nitrification) and heterotrophic (nitrogen mineralization) biogeochemical processes, and hence the relationship between carbon and nitrogen cycling in soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen SE. 1989. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Hall JRO, Likens GE. 2002. Whole-system estimates of nitrification and nitrate uptake in streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Ecosystems 5:419–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Likens GE. 2002. Dissolved organic carbon enrichment alters nitrogen dynamics in a forest stream. Ecology 83:1689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonkowski M. 2004. Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. New Phytologist 162:617–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth MS, Stark JM, Hart SC. 2006. Soil-mixing effects on inorganic nitrogen production and consumption in forest and shrubland soils. Plant Soil 289:5–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Booth MS, Stark JM, Rastetter E. 2005. Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr 75:139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann FH, Likens GE. 1979. Catastrophic disturbance and the steady-state in northern hardwood forests. Am Scientist 67:660–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Davies CA, Frey SD, Maddox TR, Melillo JM, Mohan JE, Reynolds JF, Treseder KK, Wallenstein MD. 2008a. Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature. Ecol Lett 11:1316–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Fierer N, Reynolds JF. 2008b. Soil carbon stocks in experimental mesocosms are dependent on the rate of labile carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to soils. Funct Ecol 22:964–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Warren RJII, Baldrian P, Crowther TW, Maynard DS, Oldfield EE, Wieder WR, Wood SA, King JR. 2014. Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales. Nat Clim Change 4:625–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 17:181–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham KL, Lennon JT, Brown BL. 2005. Knowing when to draw the line: designing more informative ecological experiments. Front Ecol Environ 3:145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey ME, O’Toole GA. 2000. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64:847–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dechesne A, Pallud C, Grundmann GL. 2007. Spatial distribution of bacteria at the microscale in soil. In: Franklin RB, Mills AL, Eds. The spatial distribution of microbes in the environment. Berlin: Springer. p 87–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra P, LaViolette CM, Coyle JS, Doucett RR, Schwartz E, Hart SC, Hungate BA. 2008. 15 N enrichment as an integrator of the effects of C and N on microbial metabolism and ecosystem function. Ecol Lett 11:389–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JE, Gallet-Budynek A, Hofmockel KS, Bernhardt ES, Billings SA, Jackson RB, Johnsen KS, Lichter J, McCarthy HR, McCormack ML, Moore DJP, Oren R, Palmroth S, Phillips RP, Pippen JS, Pritchard SG, Treseder KK, Schlesinger WH, DeLucia EH, Finzi AC. 2011. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol Lett 14:349–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Craine JM, McLauchlan K, Schimel JP. 2005. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology 86:320–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP. 2002. Effects of drying–rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34:777–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP. 2003. A proposed mechanism for the pulse in carbon dioxide production commonly observed following the rapid rewetting of a dry soil. Soil Sc Soc Am J 67:798–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finzi AC, Austin AT, Cleland EE, Frey SD, Houlton BZ, Wallenstein MD. 2011. Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9:61–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn KM, Vellend M, Marks PL. 2005. Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA. J Biogeogr 32:439–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo JM, Turner MG, Pearson SM, Dixon P. 2005. Effects of past land use on spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in southern appalachian forests. Ecol Monogr 75:215–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale CL, Aber JD. 2001. The long-term effects of land-use history on nitrogen cycling in northern hardwood forests. Ecol Appl 11:253–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann GL, Dechesne A, Bartoli F, Flandrois JP, Chasse JL, Kizungu R. 2001. Spatial modeling of nitrifier microhabitats in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1709–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo LB, Gifford RM. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biol 8:345–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SC, Nason GE, Myrold DD, Perry DA. 1994. Dynamics of gross nitrogen transformations in an old-growth forest—the carbon connection. Ecology 75:880–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye JP, Hart SC. 1997. Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:139–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepp JD, Coleman DC, Crossley DA, Clark JS. 2000. Biological indices of soil quality: an ecosystem case study of their use. For Ecol Manag 138:357–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepp JD, Swank WT. 1995. Comparison of available soil nitrogen assays in control and burned forested sites. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1750–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepp JD, Swank WT. 1997. Forest management effects on surface soil carbon and nitrogen. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:928–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoepp JD, Swank WT, Haines BL. 2014. Long- and short-term changes in nutrient availability following commercial sawlog harvest via cable logging. In: Swank WT, Webster JR, Eds. Long-term response of a forest watershed ecosystem: clearcutting in the southern Appalachians. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer TD, Warren RJ, Tang YY, Bradford MA. 2012. Grass invasions across a regional gradient are associated with declines in belowground carbon pools. Ecosystems 15:1271–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie M, Bradley RL. 2003. Short-term increases in relative nitrification rates due to trenching in forest floor and mineral soil horizons of different forest types. Plant Soil 252:367–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liao CZ, Luo YQ, Fang CM, Li B. 2010. Ecosystem carbon stock influenced by plantation practice: implications for planting forests as a measure of climate change mitigation. Plos One 5(5):e10867.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett GM, Rueth H. 1999. Soil nitrogen transformations in beech and maple stands along a nitrogen deposition gradient. Ecol Appl 9:1330–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens-Habbena W, Berube PM, Urakawa H, de la Torre JR, Stahl DA. 2009. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and Bacteria. Nature 461:976–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGill WB, Cole CV. 1981. Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26:267–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty DT. 1976. Comparative root and soil dynamics on a white pine watershed and in the hardwood forest in the Coweeta basin. Athens, GA: Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia. p 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty D, Kirschbaum MUF, McMurtrie RE, McGilvray H. 2002. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? a review of the literature. Global Change Biol 8:105–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff JC, Townsend AR, Gleixner G, Lehman SJ, Turnbull J, Bowman WD. 2002. Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon. Nature 419:915–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nuckolls A, Wurzburger N, Ford C, Hendrick R, Vose J, Kloeppel B. 2009. Hemlock declines rapidly with hemlock woolly adelgid infestation: Impacts on the carbon cycle of southern Appalachian forests. Ecosystems 12:179–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan N, Wu KJ, Young IM, Crawford JW, Ritz K. 2003. Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. Fems Microbiol Ecol 44:203–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SS, Schimel JP. 2011. Soil nitrogen availability and transformations differ between the summer and the growing season in a California grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 48:185–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perala DA, Alban DH. 1982. Rates of forest floor decomposition and nutrient turnover in aspen, pine and spruce stands on two different soils. Res. Pap. NC-227. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, 5.

  • Phillips RP, Finzi AC, Bernhardt ES. 2011. Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation. Ecol Lett 14:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser JI, Nicol GW. 2012. Archaeal and bacterial ammonia-oxidisers in soil: the quest for niche specialisation and differentiation. Trends Microbiol 20:523–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qian JH, Doran JW, Walters DT. 1997. Maize plant contributions to root zone available carbon and microbial transformations of nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1451–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  • Robertson GP, Wedin D, Groffman PM, Blair JM, Holland EA, Nadelhoffer KJ, Harris D. 1999. Soil carbon and nitrogen availability: nitrogen mineralization, nitrification, and soil respiration potentials. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P, Eds. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. New York: Oxford University Press. p 258–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Bennett J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Weintraub MN. 2003. The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger W. 1986. Changes in soil carbon storage and associated properties with disturbance and recovery. In: Trabalka J, Reichle D, Eds. The changing carbon cycle. New York: Springer. p 194–220.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Cole JJ, Finzi AC, Holland EA. 2011. Introduction to coupled biogeochemical cycles. Front Ecol Environ 9:5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva RG, Jorgensen EE, Holub SM, Gonsoulin ME. 2005. Relationships between culturable soil microbial populations and gross nitrogen transformation processes in a clay loam soil across ecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:259–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stark JM, Firestone MK. 1995. Mechanisms for soil-moisture effects on activity of nitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:218–21.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark JM, Hart SC. 1997. High rates of nitrification and nitrate turnover in undisturbed coniferous forests. Nature 385:61–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss EA, Lamberti AG. 2000. Regulation of nitrification in aquatic sediments by organic carbon. Waco: American Society of Limnology and Oceanography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank WT, Knoepp JD, Vose JM, Laseter S, Webster JR. 2014. Response and recovery of water yield and timing, stream sediment, abiotic parameters, and stream chemistry following logging. In: Swank WT, Webster JR, Eds. Long-term response of a forest watershed ecosystem: clearcutting in the southern Appalachians. London: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, van Straalen NM. 2008. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen FJ, Duyts H, Laanbroek HJ. 1992. Competition for ammonium between nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria in continuously percolated soil columns. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3303–11.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen FJ, Laanbroek HJ. 1991. Competition for ammonium between nitrifying and heterotrophic bacteria in dual energy-limited chemostats. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3255–63.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviroli D, Durr HH, Messerli B, Meybeck M, Weingartner R. 2007. Mountains of the world, water towers for humanity: typology, mapping, and global significance. Water Resour Res 43(7):W07447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren RJ, Bradford MA. 2011. The shape of things to come: woodland herb niche contraction begins during recruitment in mesic forest microhabitat. Proc R Soc B 278:1390–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West AW, Sparling GP. 1986. Modifications to the substrate-induced respiration method to permit measurement of microbial biomass in soils of differing water contents. J Microbiol Methods 5:177–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was through a co-operative agreement from the USDA Forest Service, the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, and from the National Science Foundation to the Coweeta LTER. We thank David Keiser for field assistance. We also thank Stephen Hart and two anonymous reviewers for their improvements to this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 06511, USA

    Ashley D. Keiser & Mark A. Bradford

  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, 251 Bessey Hall, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA

    Ashley D. Keiser

  3. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, 3160 Coweeta Lab Rd., Otto, North Carolina, 28763, USA

    Jennifer D. Knoepp

Authors
  1. Ashley D. Keiser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer D. Knoepp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark A. Bradford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley D. Keiser.

Additional information

Author Contributions

ADK, JDK, MAB conceived of the study. ADK performed the research. ADK and MAB analyzed the data and wrote the paper, with input from JDK.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keiser, A.D., Knoepp, J.D. & Bradford, M.A. Disturbance Decouples Biogeochemical Cycles Across Forests of the Southeastern US. Ecosystems 19, 50–61 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9917-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9917-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation