Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon Sequestration in the New Jersey Pine Barrens Under Different Scenarios of Fire Management

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The New Jersey Pine Barrens (NJPB) is the largest forested area along the northeastern coast of the United States. The NJPB are dominated by pine (Pinus spp.) and oak (Quercus spp.) stands that are fragmented and subject to frequent disturbance and forest management. Over long time periods (>50 years), the balance between oak and pine dominance is determined by fire frequency. As a consequence, the ability of the NJPB to sequester carbon may be contingent upon management activities as well as patterns of historic land use. We simulated 100 years of carbon change using three scenarios: (1) contemporary management as reflected in the recent (1991–2006) fire records, (2) an increase in the fire ignitions within the wildland urban interface areas of the NJPB reflecting increased prescribed fires, and (3) a longer response time to wildfires, reflecting a more liberal burning policy by the New Jersey Forest Fire Service. We used the LANDIS-II model coupled with CENTURY and the Dynamic Fire and Dynamic Biomass Fuels extensions to estimate forest carbon sequestration based on these three scenarios. Calibration and validation via comparison to monthly flux tower data indicated that the model reasonably captured the timing and magnitude of net ecosystem exchange in the absence of Gypsy moth defoliation (r 2 = 0.89). Under all scenarios, our simulations suggest that forests of the NJPB will continue to accumulate carbon over the next 100 years under current climatic conditions. Although aboveground net primary productivity, live carbon, and detrital carbon were roughly constant or increased only modestly, soil organic carbon continued to increase through time for all forest types except the highly xeric pine plains. Our simulated changes in management reflected only minor alterations to the fire regime and thus management may have only minor effects on total forest carbon budgets in the immediate future particularly when compared to recovery from historic disturbance patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albani M, Medvigy D, Hurtt GC, Moorcroft PR. 2006. The contributions of land-use change, CO2 fertilization, and climate variability to the Eastern US carbon sink. Glob Change Biol 12:2370–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiro BD, Barr AG, Barr JG, Black TA, Bracho R, Brown M, Chen J, Clark KL, Davis KJ, Desai AR, Dore S, Engel V, Fuentes JD, Goulden ML, Kolb TE, Lavigne MB, Law BE, Margolis HA, Martin T, McCaughey JH, Montes-Helu M, Noormets A, Randerson JT, Starr G, Xiao J. 2010. Ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 115:G00K02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boerner RE. 1981. Forest structure dynamics following wildfire and prescribed burning in the New Jersey pine barrens. Am Midl Nat 105:321–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Donato D, Azuma D, Law B. 2007. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J Geophys Res 112:G04014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang J-M, McEwan RW, Yaussy DA, Brown KJ. 2008. The effects of prescribed fire and silvicultural thinning on the aboveground carbon stocks and net primary production of overstory trees in an oak-hickory ecosytem in Ohio. For Ecol Manage 255:1584–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark KL, Skowronski N, Hom J, Duveneck M, Pan Y, Van Tuyl S, Cole J, Patterson M, Maurer S. 2009a. Decision support tools to improve the effectiveness of hazardous fuel reduction treatments. Int J Wildland Fire 18:268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark KL, Skowronski N, Hom J, Heilman WE. 2009b. Fireflux Experiments in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Kalispell (MT): Eighth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology. 7 pp.

  • Clark KL, Skowronski N, Gallagher M, Heilman W, Hom J. 2010a. Fuel consumption and particulate emissions during fires in the New Jersey Pinelands. Birmingham (AL): 3rd Fire Behavior and Fuels Conference.

  • Clark KL, Skowronski N, Hom J. 2010b. Invasive insects impact forest carbon dynamics. Glob Change Biol 16:88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogbill CV, Burk J, Motzkin G. 2002. The forests of presettlement New England, USA: spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys. J Biogeogr 29:1279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkral AJ, Evans AM. 2008. The effects of a thinning treatment on carbon stocks in a northern Arizona ponderosa pine forest. For Ecol Manage 255:2743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Boerner RE. 1981. Fire frequency and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Bull Torrey Bot Club 108:34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Kennish MJ, Flynn AM. 2007. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition to the New Jersey coastal waters and its implications. Ecol Appl 17:S31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ. 1981. Serotiny, geography, and fire in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Evolution 35:101–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale CL, Apps MJ, Birdsey RA, Field CB, Heath LS, Houghton RA, Jenkins JC, Kohlmaier GH, Kurz W, Liu SR, Nabuurs GJ, Nilsson S, Shvidenko AZ. 2002. Forest carbon sinks in the northern hemisphere. Ecol Appl 12:891–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goward SN, Masek JG, Cohen W, Moisen G, Collatz GJ, Healey S, Houghton RA, Huang C, Kennedy R, Law B, Powell S, Turner D, Wulder MA. 2008. Forest disturbance and North American carbon flux. Eos 89:105–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MH, Frieswyk T, Glover JF, Kelly JF. 1992. The eastwide forest inventory data base: users manual. St. Paul (MN): GTR NC-151.

  • Houghton RA. 1999. The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus B 51:298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton RA, Hackler JL. 2000. Changes in terrestrial carbon storage in the United States. I: the roles of agriculture and forestry. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 9:125–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurteau M, North M. 2009. Fuel treatment effects on tree-based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios. Front Ecol Environ 7:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM, Liebhold AM, Bjornstad ON. 2006. Geographical variation in the periodicity of gypsy moth outbreaks. Ecography 29:367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurczewski FE, Boyle HF. 2000. Historical changes in the Pine Barrens of central Suffolk County, New York. Northeast Nat 7:95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L Jr. 2008. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop Jr. RG, Kaplan MB. 2004. New Jersey Land Use/Land Cover Update: 2000/2001. New Jersey: Department of Environmental Protection.

  • Lindroth A, Lagergren F, Grelle A, Klemedtsson L, Langvall O, Weslien P, Tuulik J. 2009. Storms can cause Europe-wide reduction in forest carbon sink. Glob Change Biol 15:346–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan JA, Régnière J, Gray DR, Munson AS. 2007. Risk assessment in the face of a changing environment: gypsy moth and climate change in Utah. Ecol Appl 17:101–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick J, Jones L. 1973. The Pine Barrens: vegetation and geography. New Jersey State Museum. Research Report Number 3.

  • Mitchell SR, Harmon ME, O’Connell KEB. 2009. Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. Ecol Appl 19:643–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS. 2011. National SSURGO database [Online]. USDA-NRCS. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/ (verified 5 July 2011).

  • Pan Y, Birdsey R, Hom J, McCullough K, Clark K. 2006. Improved estimates of net primary productivity from MODIS satellite data at regional and local scales. Ecol Appl 16:125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Anderson DW, Cole CV, Steward JWB. 1983. Simulation of soil organic matter formation and mineralization in semiarid agroecosystems. In: Lowrance RR, Todd RL, Asmussen LE, Leonard RA, Eds. Nutrient cycling in agricultural ecosystems. Athens (GA): The University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations.

  • Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, Kirchner T, Menaut JC, Seastedt T, Garcia Moya E, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI. 1993. Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 7:785–809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft CR, Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ, White MS. 2010. Simulating forest restoration in a mixed ownership landscape under climate change. Ecol Appl 20:327–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK. 2009. Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:6082–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodehamel EC. 1979. Geology of the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. In: Forman RTT, Ed. Pine Barrens: ecosystem and landscape. New York (NY): Academic Press. p 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ, Crow TR, Sickley TA. 2005. Simulating the effects of fire reintroduction versus continued fire absence on forest composition and landscape structure in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Northern Minnesota, USA. Ecosystems 8:396–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ. 2007. Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible spatial and temporal resolution. Ecol Model 201:409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Van Tuyl S, Clark K, Hayden NG, Hom J, Mladenoff DJ. 2008. Simulation of forest change in the New Jersey Pine Barrens under current and pre-colonial conditions. For Ecol Manage 255:1489–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Sturtevant BR, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ, Ward BC. 2010. Increasing the reliability of ecological models using modern software engineering techniques. Front Ecol Environ 8:253–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Hua D, Bolstad PV, Birdsey RA, Mladenoff DJ. 2011. The effects of forest harvest intensity in combination with wind disturbance on carbon dynamics in Lake States mesic forests. Ecol Model 222:144–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel DS, Braswell BH, Holland EA, McKeown R, Ojima DS, Painter TH, Parton WJ, Townsend AR. 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 8:279–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JH, Burgan RE. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Fort Collins (CO): U.S. Department of Agriculture FS, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153.

  • Service UF. 2007. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Guide Version 3.0. Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, U.S.D.A. FS.

  • Skowronski N, Clark K, Nelson R, Hom J, Patterson M. 2007. Remotely sensed measurements of forest structure and fuel loads in the Pinelands of New Jersey. Remote Sens Environ 108:123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant BR, Scheller RM, Miranda BR, Shinneman D. 2009. Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: a process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II. Ecol Model 220:3380–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syphard AD, Scheller RM, Ward BC, Spencer WD, Strittholt JR. 2011. Simulating landscape-scale effects of fuels treatments in the Sierra Nevada, California. Int J Fire Manage 20:364–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedrow JCF. 1986. Soils of New Jersey. Malabar (FL): Station NJAE. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Publication A-15134-1-82.

  • Thompson JR, Foster DR, Scheller RM, Kittredge D. in press. The influence of climate change, timber harvest, and rural development on forest biomass and composition in Massachusetts, USA. Ecological Applications.

  • Thornton PE, Law BE, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein AH, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Falk M, Sparks JP. 2002. Modeling and measure the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests. Agric For Meteorol 115:185–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throop HL, Holland EA, Parton WJ, Ojima DS, Keough CA. 2004. Effects of nitrogen deposition and insect herbivory on patterns of ecosystem-level carbon and nitrogen dynamics: results from the Century model. Glob Change Biol 10:1092–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagner CE. 1987. Development and structure of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Ottawa (ON): Forestry Technical Report 35.

  • Wacker PO. 1979. Human exploitation of the New Jersey Pine Barrens before 1900. In: Forman RTT, Ed. Pine Barrens: ecosystem and landscape. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.

  • Wright CS, Ottmar RD, Vihnanek RE. 2007. Stereo photo series for quantifying natural fuels. Volume VIII: hardwood, pitch pine, and red spruce/basam fire types in the Northeastern United States. Boise (ID): National Wildfire Coordinating Group NIFC. PMS 840.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The US Forest Service Forest Health Monitoring program (NE-F-08-01), National Fire Plan, and the Eastern Landfire Protoype has generously funded aspects of this research. Melissa Lucash and Jonathan Thompson provided a critical review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Scheller.

Additional information

Author Contributions

Scheller: Primary author, conducted all simulations. Van Tuyl: Gathered and summarized parameterization data. Created fuel types and conducted cross-tabulation with FBFM fuel types. Created all maps. Clark: Provided flux tower data and guided the analysis of net ecosystem exchange. Hom: Coordinated data acquisition and co-wrote the Discussion. La Puma: Provided empirical fire data and assisted with fire calibration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheller, R.M., Van Tuyl, S., Clark, K.L. et al. Carbon Sequestration in the New Jersey Pine Barrens Under Different Scenarios of Fire Management. Ecosystems 14, 987–1004 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9462-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9462-6

Key words

Navigation