Abstract
Emulation of natural disturbance processes and their effects is important to maintain the structure and composition of managed forests. To examine whether logging and fire have different effects on natural regeneration, we studied the recruitment of six common boreal tree species (Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera, Pinus banksiana, Picea mariana, Picea glauca, and Abies balsamea) after fire and clearcutting in northern Ontario. Regeneration densities of all studied species, except P. glauca and A. balsamea, were positively related to their respective pre-disturbance basal area. Post-disturbance regeneration densities of P. tremuloides and P. banksiana did not differ between disturbance types, whereas those of B. papyrifera were higher after fire, and those of P. mariana and A. balsamea were higher after clearcutting. Among tree species, the composition of P. tremuloides increased by approximately 35% after both disturbance types, that of B. papyrifera increased by 22% after fire and 11% after clearcutting, whereas those of P. banksiana, P. mariana, P. glauca, and A. balsamea decreased to various extents. Compared with fire, clearcutting significantly increased the post-disturbance presence of A. balsamea, which is attributed to surviving advance regeneration after logging. The natural regeneration process after fire appears to be emulated by clearcutting for P. tremuloides, P. banksiana, P. mariana, and P. glauca, but the increase in B. papyrifera after clearcutting is less pronounced than after fire, whereas the reduction of A. balsamea after clearcutting is less severe than after fire.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arseneault D. 2001. Impact of fire behavior on postfire forest development in a homogeneous boreal landscape. Can J For Res 31:1367–1374.
Bergeron Y, Charron D. 1994. Postfire stand dynamics in a southern boreal forest (Québec): A dendroecological approach. Ecoscience 1:173–184.
Brassard BW, Chen HYH. 2008. Effects of forest type and disturbance on diversity of coarse woody debris in boreal forest. Ecosystems 11:1078–1090.
Carleton TJ, MacLellan P. 1994. Woody vegetation responses to fire versus clear cut logging: A comparative survey in the central Canadian boreal forest. Ecoscience 1:141–152.
Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM). 2005. Criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in Canada. National status 2005. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario.
Charron I, Greene DF. 2002. Post-wildfire seedbeds and tree establishment in the southern mixedwood boreal forest. Can J For Res 32:1607–1615.
Chen HYH, Popadiouk RV. 2002. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environ Rev 10:137–166.
Chen HYH, Vasiliauskas S, Kayahara GJ, Ilisson T. 2009. Wildfire promotes broadleaves and species mixture in boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 257:343–350.
Chen HYH, Wang JR. 2006. Post-harvest regeneration of lowland black spruce forests in northeastern Ontario. New Forests 31:115–129.
Ecoregions Working Group. 1989. Ecoclimatic regions of Canada: first approximation. Ecological Land Classification Series 23. Ottawa, ON: Sustainable Development Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada
Eliasson L. 1971. Growth regulators in Populus tremula III. Variation of auxin and inhibitor level in roots in relation to root sucker formation. Physiol Planta 25:118–121.
Environment Canada (2009) Canadian climate normals 1971–2000. http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca, accessed on 10.10.2008
Eyre FH. 1938. Can jack pine be regenerated without fire? J For 36:1067-1072.
Farmer RE. 1962. Aspen root sucker formation and apical dominance. For Sci 8:403–410.
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574.
Foster DR. 1985. Vegetation development following fire in Picea mariana (black spruce) Pleurozium forests of southeastern Labrador, Canada. J Ecol 73:517–534.
Fraser EC, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM. 2004. Wounding of aspen roots promotes suckering. Can J Bot 82:310–315.
Frey BR, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM, Comeau PG, Greenway KJ. 2003. An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen. Can J For Res 33:1169–1179.
Greene DF, Johnson EA. 1999. Modelling recruitment of Populus tremuloides, Pinus banksiana, and Picea mariana following fire in the mixedwood boreal forest. Can J For Res 29:462–473.
Greene DF, Kneeshaw DD, Messier C, Lieffers V, Cormier D, Doucet R, Coates KD, Groot A, Grover G, Calogeropoulos C. 2002. Modelling silvicultural alternatives for conifer regeneration in boreal mixedwood stands (aspen/white spruce/balsam fir). For Chron 78:281–295.
Greene DF, Macdonald SE, Haeussler S, Domenicano S, Noel J, Jayen K, Charron I, Gauthier S, Hunt S, Gielau ET, Bergeron Y, Swift L. 2007. The reduction of organic–layer depth by wildfire in the North American boreal forest and its effect on tree recruitment by seed. Can J For Res 37:1012–1023.
Greene DF, Noel J, Bergeron Y, Rousseau M, Gauthier S. 2004. Recruitment of Picea mariana, Pinus banksiana, and Populus tremuloides across a burn severity gradient following wildfire in the southern boreal forest of Quebec. Can J For Res 34:1845–1857.
Gutsell SL, Johnson EA. 2002. Accurately ageing trees and examining their height–growth rates: implications for interpreting forest dynamics. J Ecol 90:153–166.
Haeussler S, Bergeron Y. 2004. Range of variability in boreal aspen plant communities after wildfire and clear–cutting. Can J For Res 34:274–288.
Harper KA, Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Drapeau P. 2002. Post–fire development of canopy structure and composition in black spruce forests of Abitibi, Quebec: A landscape scale study. Silva Fenn 36:249–263.
Hart SA, Chen HYH. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecol Monogr 78:123–140.
Harvey B, Brais S. 2002. Effects of mechanized careful logging on natural regeneration and vegetation competition in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest. Can J For Res 32:653–666.
Harvey BD, Bergeron Y. 1989 Site patterns of natural regeneration following clear–cutting in northwestern Quebec. Can J For Res 19:1458–1469.
Hewitt N. 1998. Seed size and shade–tolerance: a comparative analysis of North American temperate trees. Oecologia 114:432–440.
Hunter ML. 1999. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Johnstone JF, Chapin FS, Foote J, Kemmett S, Price K, Viereck L. 2004. Decadal observations of tree regeneration following fire in boreal forests. Can J For Res 34:267–273.
Johnstone JF, Kasischke ES. 2005. Stand–level effects of soil burn severity on postfire regeneration in a recently burned black spruce forest. Can J For Res 35:2151–2163.
Kemperman JA, Barnes BV. 1976. Clone size in American aspens. Can J Bot 54:2603–2607.
Lamont BB, Lemaitre DC, Cowling RM, Enright NJ. 1991. Canopy seed storage in woody–plants. Bot Rev 57:277–317.
Lavertu D, Mauffette Y, Bergeron Y. 1994. Effects of stand age and litter removal on the regeneration of Populus tremuloides. J Veg Sci 5:561–568.
Lavoie L, Sirois L. 1998. Vegetation changes caused by recent fires in the northern boreal forest of eastern Canada. J Veg Sci 9:483–492.
Legendre P, Legendre L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd English edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mallik AU, Bell FW, Gong Y. 1997. Regeneration behavior of competing plants after clear cutting: implications for vegetation management. For Ecol Manag 95:1–10.
Marquis DA, Bjorkbom JC, Yelenosky G. 1964. Effect of seedbed condition and light exposure on paper birch regeneration. J For 62:876–881.
McRae DJ, Duchesne LC, Freedman B, Lynham TJ, Woodley S. 2001. Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management. Environ Rev 9:223–260.
Nguyen-Xuan T, Bergeron Y, Simard D, Fyles JW, Pare D. 2000. The importance of forest floor disturbance in the early regeneration patterns of the boreal forest of western and central Quebec: a wildfire versus logging comparison. Can J For Res 30:1353–1364.
Parker KR, Wiens JA. 2005. Assessing recovery following environmental accidents: Environmental variation, ecological assumptions, and strategies. Ecol Appl 15:2037–2051.
Pausas JG, Bradstock RA, Keith DA, Keeley JE. 2004. Plant functional traits in relation to fire in crown–fire ecosystems. Ecology 85:1085–1100.
Perala DA, Alm AA. 1990. Reproductive ecology of birch: A review. For Ecol Manag 32:1–38.
Rodrigo A, Retana J, Pico FX. 2004. Direct regeneration is not the only response of Mediterranean forests to large fires. Ecology 85:716–729.
Rowe JS. 1972. The forest regions of Canada. Canada: Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Canadian Forest Service, Publication no. 1300
Simon NPP, Schwab FE. 2005. The response of conifer and broad–leaved trees and shrubs to wildfire and clearcut logging in the boreal forests of central Labrador. North J Appl For 22:35–41.
Steneker GA. 1974. Factors affecting the suckering of trembling aspen. For Chron 50:32–34.
St-Pierre H, Gagnon R, Bellefleur P. 1992. Régénération après feu de l’épinette noire (Picea mariana) et du pin gris (Pinus banksiana) dans la forêt boréale. Québec. Can J For Res 22:.474–481.
Strong WL, Laroi GH. 1983. Root–system morphology of common boreal forest trees in Alberta, Canada. Can J For Res 13:1164–1173.
Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW. 1997. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol Monogr 67:411–433.
Wang GG. 2003. Early regeneration and growth dynamics of Populus tremuloides suckers in relation to fire severity. Can J For Res 33:1998–2006.
Wiens JA, Parker KR. 1995. Analyzing the effects of accidental environmental impacts – approaches and assumptions. Ecol Appl 5:1069–1083.
Acknowledgements
We thank Stephen Hart for field assistance. We would like to thank Paul Poschmann, Gordon Kayahara, and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. Financial support for this study by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for a Discovery Grant (283336-04) and the Sustainable Forest Management Network Centre of Excellence of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author Contributions
TI designed the study, performed field data collection, conducted data analysis, and wrote the manuscript; HC conceived the study and contributed to study design, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ilisson, T., Chen, H.Y.H. Response of Six Boreal Tree Species to Stand Replacing Fire and Clearcutting. Ecosystems 12, 820–829 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9259-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9259-z