Skip to main content
Log in

A Systems Model Approach to Determining Resilience Surrogates for Case Studies

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Resilience theory offers a framework for understanding the dynamics of complex systems. However, operationalizing resilience theory to develop and test empirical hypotheses can be difficult. We present a method in which simple systems models are used as a framework to identify resilience surrogates for case studies. The process of constructing a systems model for a particular case offers a path for identifying important variables related to system resilience, including the slowly-changing variables and thresholds that often are keys to understanding the resilience of a system. We develop a four-step process for identifying resilience surrogates through development of systems models. Because systems model development is often a difficult step, we summarize four basic existing systems models and give examples of how each may be used to identify resilience surrogates. The construction and analysis of simple systems models provides a useful basis for guiding and directing the selection of surrogate variables that will offer appropriate empirical measures of resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Caraco NF. 2001. Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication: a global perspective. BioScience 51:227–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Seixas CS. 2005. In review for this issue. Surrogates for Resilience in Lagoon Social–Ecological Systems

  • Calef GW. 1988. Maximum rate of increase of the African elephant. Afr J Ecol 26:323–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Westley F, Turner MG. 2005. Surrogates for resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecosystems 8:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR. 2003. Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: Pattern and variation. Excellence in Ecology series, volume 15, Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe Germany

  • Carpenter SR, Bolgrien D, Lathrop RC, Stow CA, Reed T, Wilson MA. 1998a. Ecological and economic analysis of lake eutrophication by nonpoint pollution. Aust J Ecol 23:68–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998b. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DHM. 1980. The management of elephant and other large mammals in Zimbabwe. In: Jewell PA, Holt S, Hart D. Eds. Problems in management of locally abundant wild mammals. New York: Academic Press. p 91–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming DHM, Fenton MB, Rautenbach IL, Taylor RD, Cumming GS, Cumming MS, Dunlop JM, Ford AG, Hovorka MD, Johnston DS, Kalcounis M, Mahlanga Z, Portfors CVR. 1997. Elephants, woodlands and biodiversity in southern Africa. South Afr J Sci 93:231–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis. 1998. Creating scenarios for your company`s future. Presented at the corporate environmental, health, and safety excellence: bringing sustainable development down to earth. New York

  • DeAngelis DL, Post WM, T. C. C. 1980. Positive feedback in natural systems. New York: Springler-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Glitzenstein JS, Platt WJ, Streng DR. 1995. Effects of fire regime and habitat on tree dynamics in north Florida longleaf pine savannas. Ecol Monogr 65:441–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington (DC): Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyward F. 1939. The relation of fire to stand composition of longleaf pine forests. Ecology 20:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoare RD, Du Topit JT. 1999. Coexistence between people and elephants in African savannas. Conserv Biol 13:633–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, CS, Meffe GK. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10:328-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Gunderson LH. 2002. Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Eds. Panarchy. Washington (DC): Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373-86

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP. 2001. Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 4:709–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT. 1983. Systems ecology: an introduction. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn FV, Parker GE. 2003. Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 37:80–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Allen CR, Holling CS. 1998. Ecological resilience, biodiversity and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Beard TD Jr, Beisner BE, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Cumming GS, Dent CL, Havlicek TD. 2003a. Assessing future ecosystem services: a case study of the northern highlands lake district, Wisconsin. Conserv Ecol 7:[online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art1

  • Peterson GD, Cumming G, Carpenter SR. 2003b. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conserv Biol 17:358–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD. 2002a. “Forest dynamics in the southeastern United States: managing multiple stable states.” In: Gunderson LH. Pritchard L Jr, Eds. Resilience and behavior of large scale ecosystems. Washington (DC) Island Press. p 227–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD. 2002b. Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6(1):17. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17

    Google Scholar 

  • Petschel-Held G, Block A, Cassel-Gintz M, Kropp J, Lüdeke MKB, Moldenhauer O, Reusswig F, Schellnhuber HJ. 1999. Syndromes of global change: a qualitative modeling approach to support global environmental management. Environ Model Assess 4(4):295–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebertus AJ, Williamson GB, Moser EB. 1989. Longleaf pine pyrogenicity and turkey oak mortality in Florida xeric sandhills. Ecology 70:60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer M-L, Moss B, Jeppesen E. 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol Evol 8:275–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591-596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DW. 1977. Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195:260–2

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM. 1990. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York (NY): Currency Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B. 2002. Cause and correlation in biology: a user’s guide to path analysis, structural equations and causal inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p 317

    Google Scholar 

  • Soranno PA, Carpenter SR, Lathrop RC. 1997. Internal phosphorus loading in Lake Mendota: response to external loads and weather. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1883–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starfield AM, Cumming DHM, Taylor RD, Quadling MS. 1993. A frame-based paradigm for dynamic ecosystem models. AI Appl 7:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ. 1999. Consequences of the Allee effect for behavior, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 14:401–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden K. 1996. Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. New York (NY): Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R. 2002. Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters C, Kitchell JF. 2001. Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. CJFAS 58:39–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We dedicate this paper to the memory of Gerhard Petschel-Held, a colleague and friend whose work on syndromes of global change greatly influenced our thinking about resilience surrogates. His adventurous spirit, clarity of thought, and humor are deeply missed. Additionally, we thank three anonymous reviewers whose comments improved this manuscript. We also thank our colleagues in the Resilience Alliance for the many conversations that stimulated our thinking about resilience and its surrogates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. M. Bennett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bennett, E., Cumming, G. & Peterson, G. A Systems Model Approach to Determining Resilience Surrogates for Case Studies. Ecosystems 8, 945–957 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0141-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0141-3

Key words:

Navigation