Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial Community Responses to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Enrichment in a Warm-Temperate Forest

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forest productivity depends on nutrient supply, and sustained increases in forest productivity under elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) may ultimately depend on the response of microbial communities to changes in the quantity and chemistry of plant-derived substrates, We investigated microbial responses to elevated CO2 in a warm-temperate forest under free-air CO2 enrichment for 5 years (1997–2001). The experiment was conducted on three 30 m diameter plots under ambient CO2 and three plots under elevated CO2 (200 ppm above ambient). To understand how microbial processes changed under elevated CO2, we assayed the activity of nine extracellular enzymes responsible for the decomposition of labile and recalcitrant carbon (C) substrates and the release of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from soil organic matter. Enzyme activities were measured three times per year in a surface organic horizon and in the top 15 cm of mineral soil. Initially, we found significant increases in the decomposition of labile C substrates in the mineral soil horizon under elevated CO2; this overall pattern was present but much weaker in the O horizon. Beginning in the 4th year of this study, enzyme activities in the O horizon declined under elevated CO2, whereas they continued to be stimulated in the mineral soil horizon. By year 5, the degradation of recalcitrant C substrates in mineral soils was significantly higher under elevated CO2. Although there was little direct effect of elevated CO2 on the activity of N- and P-releasing enzymes, the activity of nutrient-releasing enzymes relative to those responsible for C metabolism suggest that nutrient limitation is increasingly regulating microbial activity in the O horizon. Our results show that the metabolism of microbial communities is significantly altered by the response of primary producers to elevated CO2. We hypothesize that ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 are shifting from primary production to decomposition as a result of increasing nutrient limitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen AS, Andrews JA, Finzi AC, Matamala R, Richter DD, Schlesinger WH. 2000. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on belowground processes in a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forest. Ecol Appl 10:437–53

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen AS, Schlesinger WH. 2004. Nutrient limitations to soil microbial biomass and activity in loblolly pine forests. Soil Biol Biochem 36:581–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews JA, Schlesinger WH. 2001. C02 dynamics, acidification, and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO2 enrichment. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15:149–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews JA, Harrison KG, Matamala R, Schlesinger WH. 1999. Separatic of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE). Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1429–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Comins HN, McMurtrie RE. 1993. Long-term response of nutrient limited forests to CO2 enrichment: equilibrium behavior of plant–soil models. Ecol Appls 3:666–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeLucia EH, Hamilton JG, Naidu SL, Thomas RB, Andrews JA, Finzi A, Lavine M, et al. 1999. Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment. Science 284:1177––79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhillion SS, Roy J, Abrams M. 1996. Assessing the impact of elevated CO2 on soil microbial activity in a Mediterranean model ecosystem. Plant Soil 187:333–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH. 2002. Species control variation in litter decomposition in a pine forest exposed to elevated CO2. Global Change Biol 8:1217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH. 2003. Soil-nitrogen cycling in a pine forest exposed to five years of elevated carbon dioxide. Ecosystems 6:444–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Finzi AC, Allen AS, Schlesinger WH, DeLucia EH, Ellsworth DS. 2001. Forest litter production, chemistry, and decomposition following two years of free-air CO2 enrichment. Ecology 82:470–84

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finzi AC, DeLucia EH, Hamilton JG, Richter DD, Schlesinger WH. 2002. The nitrogen budget of a pine forest under free air CO2 enrichment. Oecologia 132:567–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Finzi AC, DeLucia EH, Schlesinger WH. 2004. Canopy N and P dynamics of a southeastern US pine forest under elevated CO2. Biogeochemistry 69:363–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Finzi AC, Moore DJP, DeLucia EH, Lichter J, Hofmockel KS, Jackson RB, Kim HS, Matamala R, McCarthy HR, Oren R, Pippen JS, Schlesinger WH. 2006. Progressive N limitation of ecosystem processes under elevated CO2 in a warm-temperate forest. Ecology 87:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman C, Hojeong K, Ostle N, 2001. An enzymic “latch” on a global carbon store. Nature 409:149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu JS, Cheng W. 2002. Rhizosphere priming effects on the decomposition of soil organic matter in C4 and C3 grassland soils. Plant Soil 238:289–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton JS, DeLucia EH, George K, Naidu SL, Finzi AC, Schlesinger WH. 2002. Forest carbon balance under elevated CO2. Oecologia 131:250–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hendrey GR, Ellsworth DS, Lewin KF, Nagy J. 1999. A free-air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology 5:293–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes WE, Zak DR, Pregitzen KS, King JS. 2003. Soil nitrogen transformations under Populus tremuloides, Betula papyrifera, and Acer saccharum following toee years exposure to elevated CO2 and O3. Global Change Biol 9:1743–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoosbeek MR, Lukac M, van Dam D, Godbold DL, Velthorst EJ, Biondi FA, Peressotti A, Cotrufo MF, de Angelis P, Scarascia-Mugnozza G. 2004. More new carbon in the mineral soil of a poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide emichment (popface): cause of increased priming effect? Global Biogeocliem Cycles 18:1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu SJ, Chapin FS, Firestone MK, Field CB, Chiariello NR. 2001. Nitrogen limitation of microbial decomposition in a grassland under elevated CO2. Nature 409:188–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hungate BA, Holland EA, Jackson RB, Chapin FS, Mooney HA, Field CB. 1997. The fate of carbon in grasslands under carbon dioxide enrichment, Nature 388:576–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson DW, Hungate BA, Djikstra P, Hymus G, Drake B. 2001. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on soils in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. J Environ Qual 30:501–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karnosky DF, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Awmack CS, Bockheim JG, Dickson RE, Hendrey GR, Host GE, King JS, Kopper BJ, Kruger EL, Kubiske ME, Lindroth RL, Mattson WJ, Mcdonald EP, Noormets A, Oksanen E, Parsons WFJ, Percy KE, Podila GK, Riemenschneider DE, Sharma P, Thakur R, Sober A, Sober J, Jones WS, Anttonen S, Vapaavuori E, Mankovska B, Heilman W, Isebrands JG. 2003. Tropospheric O3 noderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2 a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Funct Eco 17:289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  24. King JS, Hanson PJ, Bernhardt E, De Angelis P, Norby RJ, Pregitzer KS. 2004. A multiyear synthesis of soil respiration responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 from four forest FACE experiments. Global Change Biology 10:1027–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Köraer C, Arnone JA. 1992. Responses to elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems. Science 257:1672–75

    Google Scholar 

  26. Larsen JL, Zak DR, Sinsabaugh RL. 2002. Microbial activity beneath temperate trees growing under elevated CO2 and O3. Soil Sco Am J 66:1848–56

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lichter J, Barron S, Finzi AC, Irving KF, Roberts M, Stemmler EA, Schlesinger WH 2005. Soil carbon sequestration and turnover in a pine forest after six years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Ecology 86:1835–1847

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luo Y, Reynolds JF. 1999. Validity of extrapolating field CO2 experiments to predict carbon sequestration in natural ecosystems. Ecology 80:1568–1383

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luo Y, Su B, Curric WS, Dukes JS, Finzi AC, Hartwig U, Hungate B, McMurtric R, Oren R, Parton W, Pataki D, Shaw RM, Zak DR, Field CB. 2004. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2. Bioscience 54:731–739

    Google Scholar 

  30. Matamala R, Schlesinger WH, 2000. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root production and activity in an intact temperate forest ecosystem. Global Change Biology 6:967–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Matamala R, Gonzalez-Meler. MA, Jstro JD, Norby RJ, Sohlesinger WH. 2003. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestraation potential. Science 202:1385–7

    Google Scholar 

  32. Norby RJ, Hanson PJ, O’Neill EG, Tschaplinski TJ, Weltzin JF, Hansen RA, Cheng W, et al. 2002. Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage. Ecol Appl 12:1261–66

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oren R, Ellsworth DS, Johnsen KH, Phillips N, Ewers BE, Maler C, Schafer KVR, et al. 2001. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips RL, Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC. (2002) Microbial community composition and function beneath temperate trees exposed to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and ozone. Oecologia 131:236–44

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pritchard SG, Rogers HH, Davis MA, Van Santen E, Prior SA, Schlesinger WH. 2001. The influence of elevated atmospheric CO2 on fine root dynamics in an intact temperate forest. Global Change Biol 7:829–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rastetter EB, ÅgrenGI, Shaver GR. 1997. Responses of N-limited ecosystems to increased CO2: a balanced-nutrition, coupled-element-cycles model. Ecol Appl 7:444–60

    Google Scholar 

  37. Saiya-Cork K, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. 2002. Effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in Acer saccharum forest soil Soil Biol Biochem 34:1309–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schlesingen WH, Lichten J. 2001. Limited carbon storage in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased atmopheric CO2. Nature 411:466–9

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sinsabaugh RL, Moorehead DL. 1994. Resource-allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sinsabaugk RL, Carreiro MM, Repert DA. 2002. Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry 60:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sinsabaugh R, Saiya-Cork K, Long T, Osgood MP, Nehen DA, Zak DR, Norby RJ. 2003. Soil microbial activity in a Liquidambar plantation unresponsive to CO2-driven increases in primary production. Appl Soil Ecol 24:263–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tank JL, Webster JR, Benfield EF, Sinsabaugh RL. 1998. Effect of leaf litter exclusion on microbial enzyme activity associated with wood biofilms in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 17:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, King JS, Holmes WE 2000. Elevated atmospheric CO2, fine roots, and the response of soil microorganisms: a review and hypothesis. New Phytol 147:201–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zak DR, Holmes WE, Finzi AC, Norby RJ, Schlesinger WH. 2003. Soil nitrogen cycling under elevated CO2: a synthesis of forest FACE experiments. Ecol Appl 13:1508–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Office of Science (BER) Program, US Department of Energy, and through its Southeast Regional Center (SERC) of the National Institute for Global Environmental Change (NIGEC) under Cooperative Agreement. DE-FC03-90ER61010, and its Terrestrial Carbon Processes Program (TCP). Additional funding for R.L.S was provided by the US Department of Agriculture through the Terrestrial Ecosystems and Global Change Program. Additional funding for A.C.F. was provided by the National Science Foundation (DEB-9815350, DEB-0236356). William H. Schlesinger generously provided laboratory space at the Duke University Phytotron.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrien C. Finzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Finzi, A.C., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Long, T.M. et al. Microbial Community Responses to Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Enrichment in a Warm-Temperate Forest. Ecosystems 9, 215–226 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0078-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0078-6

Keywords

Navigation