Abstract
As China’s national carbon emissions trading system (ETS) is counting down to establishment, experience and lessons from pilot ETSs are of great value, which come from assessment of the implementation effectiveness, especially how the covered entities are affected. To understand how well the pilot ETSs have operated and how entities behave, the research conducted two questionnaire surveys among covered entities in the pilot ETSs in 2015 and 2018. The surveys investigate how strictly rules have been enforced for monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) and compliance. Inquiries are also made about the pressure imposed by ETSs and the abatement actions that covered entities have taken in consequence. The results show that (1) while compliance procedures and measures have become routine, further improvement is required regarding enforcement of MRV rules in certain pilots; (2) the free allowance allocation methods tend to be tightened though the allocation results at present are much likely to be “approximately balanced”; (3) almost all of the entities surveyed have developed emission abatement strategies with a significant improvement compared to the survey in 2015, but nearly half of the entities have no explicit emission reduction targets along with limited perception of marginal abatement costs; and (4) compliance remains the dominant driver for entities to participate in emissions trading, while strategies are emerging to gain profits from emissions trading by enhancing carbon asset management capacity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arimura TH, Abe T (2020) The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction? Environ Econ Policy Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00271-w
Bel G, Joseph S (2018) Policy stringency under the European Union emission trading system and its impact on technological change in the energy sector. Energy Policy 117:434–444
Bosello F, Davide M, Alloisio I (2016) Economic implications of eu mitigation policies: domestic and international effects. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2771046
Chang K, Shibao L, Song X (2018) The impacts of liquidity dynamics on emissions allowances price: different evidence from china’s emissions trading pilots. J Clean Prod 183:786–796
Cong R, Lo YA (2017) Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China. Appl Energy 193:414–425
Dai Y, Li N, Rongrong G, Zhu X (2018) Can China’s carbon emissions trading rights mechanism transform its manufacturing industry? Based on the perspective of enterprise behavior. Sustainability 10(7):2421
Deng Z, Li D, Pang T, Duan M (2018) Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China. Clim Policy 18(8):992–1011
Hamamoto M (2020) Impact of the Saitama prefecture target-setting emissions trading program on the adoption of low-carbon technology. Environ Econ Policy Stud
Hu Y-J, Li X-Y, Tang -J (2017) Assessing the operational performance and maturity of the carbon trading pilot program: the case study of Beijing’s carbon market. J Clean Prod 161:1263–1274
Jaraite J, Kažukauskas A (2012) Firm trading behaviour and transaction costs in the European Union’s emission trading system: an empirical assessment
Laing T, Sato M, Grubb M, Comberti C (2014) The effects and side-effects of the EU emissions trading scheme. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 5(4):509–519
Liu Y-P, Guo J-F, Fan Y (2017) A big data study on emitting companies’ performance in the first two phases of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. J Clean Prod 142:1028–1043
Marin G, Marino M, Pellegrin C (2018) The impact of the European Emission trading scheme on multiple measures of economic performance. Environ Resour Econ 71(2):551–582
Ralf M, Mirabelle M, Wagner Ulrich J (2015) Impact of the European union emissions trading scheme on regulated firms: what is the evidence after ten years? Rev Environ Econ Policy 10(1):129–148
Rogge K (2016) Reviewing the evidence on the innovation impact of the EU emission trading system
Suk S (2018) Determinants and characteristics of Korean companies’ carbon management under the carbon pricing scheme 23
Suk S, Lee S, Jeong YS (2018) The Korean emissions trading scheme: business perspectives on the early years of operations. Clim Policy 18(6):715–728
Tang R, Guo W, Oudenes M, Li P, Wang J, Tang J, Wang L, Wang H (2018) Key challenges for the establishment of the monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) system in China’s National Carbon Emissions Trading Market. Clim Policy 18(sup1):106–121
Venmans F (2012) A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(8):5493–5510
Yang Y, Cheng L (2017) Operational efficiency evaluation and system design improvements for carbon emissions trading pilots in China. Carbon Manag 8:399–415
Yu X, Shi G, Wang J (2018) Assessing five pilot carbon trading programs in China from a perspective of efficiency analysis. OP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 121:052075
Zaklan A (2013) Why do emitters trade carbon permits? Firm-level evidence from the european emission trading scheme. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 2239656. Social Science Research Network, Rochester
Zhang H, Fan L-W (2019) Can emission trading help to improve energy efficiency in China? Energ Effi 12(4):979–991
Zhang Y-J, Liu J-Y (2019) Does carbon emissions trading affect the financial performance of high energy-consuming firms in China? Nat Hazards 95(1):91–111
Zhang L, Cao C, Tang F, He J, Li D (2018) Does China’s emissions trading system foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from regulating listed companies. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 31(2):199–212
Zhao XG, Jiang GW, Dan N, Hao C (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: a perspective of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1229–1245
Zhao X-g, Lei W, Li A (2017) Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 79:1–8
Zhou Y, Jiang J, Ye B, Zhang Y, Yan J (2019) Addressing climate change through a market mechanism: a comparative study of the pilot emission trading schemes in China. Environ Geochem Health 42:745–767
Zhu J, Fan Y, Deng X, Xue L (2019) Low-carbon innovation induced by emissions trading in China. Nat Commun 10(1):4088
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge funding from the National Social Science Fund of China (Project 18ZDA107) and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Project 2018YFC1509004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, D., Duan, M., Deng, Z. et al. Assessment of the performance of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China. Environ Econ Policy Stud 23, 593–612 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00283-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00283-6
Keywords
- Emissions trading
- Pilots
- Questionnaire survey
- Effectiveness evaluation
- Corporate behavior and strategies