Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Residential preferences for stable electricity supply and a reduction in air pollution risk: a benefit transfer study using choice modeling in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses choice modeling surveys from the Chinese cities of Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, and Changsha, Hunan Province, to identify residential preferences for simultaneously increasing the stability of the electricity supply and decreasing the health risks from air pollution. Air pollution in China is mainly attributable to externalities associated with the electricity supply. We employ a contingent ranking approach as our choice modeling method and test for the transfer of benefits for these preferences between the two sites. The original benefit estimates indicate that the implicit price for reducing the number of power breakdowns is about RMB 83 per times × year × household in Jiujiang and RMB 78 per times × year × household in Changsha, while the implicit price for reducing the duration of power breakdowns is statistically zero in Jiujiang and RMB 71 per times × year × household in Changsha. From the alternative perspective, we estimate that the annualized value of the statistical lifetime risk of cancer caused by air pollution over a 70-year period is RMB 50,844 per year in Jiujiang and RMB 67,146 per year in Changsha. This suggests that we do not reject benefit transferability based on the implicit price of the number of power breakdowns, but do reject it based on the number of deaths from cancer caused by air pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Matsukawa and Fujii (1994) examined the choice of backup equipment by large-scale computer users. In terms of household preferences in China, it is reasonable to view this choice as unrealistic given the relatively small scale of household electricity usage.

  2. The Japanese Bank for International Cooperation has supported a number of official development assistance (ODA) loan projects in China, including the construction of the coal-fired thermal power plant in Jiujiang and a hydropower plant in the western region of Hunan Province. The former included funding for special equipment aimed at reducing the emissions of certain pollutants (including NOx, SOx, and PM10) associated with the power plant, and the latter funding was used to construct a cleaner alternative to a coal-fired power plant. Both projects thus aimed to provide more stable, cleaner, and more efficient energy to these areas, and to avert any health risks related to local air pollution.

  3. In 2007, the populations of Jiujiang and Changsha were 4.69 million and 6.28 million, respectively.

  4. Indeed, similar studies have frequently omitted a status quo option because of the difficulty in setting such an option. For example, Carlsson and Martinsson (2008) omitted a status quo option because “…both the historical levels of outages as well as future levels vary a lot, and in most cases are related to random events, it is difficult to include a realistic status-quo alternative in a postal questionnaire” (Carlsson and Martinsson 2008, p 1236).

  5. Other forms of local air pollution, such as NOx or SOx, remain outside the scope of the analysis. As we could not find any epidemiological data on their association with health risk, we decided in this study to concentrate on the mortality and cancer risk related to PM10. Elsewhere, Ito and Thurston (1996) examined the association between cancer risk and PM10 concentration, and Lee et al. (2002) examined the link between cancer risk and SO2 concentration.

  6. According to the World Development Indicators, life expectancy in China was about 72.835 years in 2008 (World Develop Indicator in World Bank website, URL: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators).

  7. Although we could have defined the annual cost of the electricity supply, we chose to define it on a monthly basis because we expected that respondents at each site typically perceive the cost of electricity on a monthly, not annual, basis.

  8. We also employed a linear form of the utility function with regard to attributes in the choice set.

  9. Assuming a strictly increasing, continuous, and strictly quasi-concave utility function.

  10. We appreciate comments from the editors and two anonymous referees that indicated that this assumption may have needed to be tested. We tested it with respect to four attributes in the choice set using the Hausman test, and obtained the following test statistics: 870.476 in Jiujiang, and 4.563 in Changsha, respectively. Thus, the homogeneity in ranking is rejected in Jiujiang, while it is not rejected in Changsha at the 5% significance level (\( {{\upchi}}_{0.05} \left( 4 \right) = 9.488 \)). For simplicity, and in order to fully utilize information from the ranking of responses, we assumed homogeneity in ranking with regard to the data in both sites. As it may be a rather strict assumption, there are certain limitations on the parameter estimates for Jiujiang.

  11. We removed tied values in the ranking prior to estimation. There were two respondents in Jiujiang, and four respondents in Changsha, whom we removed prior to the estimation.

  12. For any two alternatives \( i \) and \( k \), the IIA property of CL in Eq. 2 is equivalent to the ratio of the probabilities being not dependent on any alternatives other than \( i \) and \( k \) \( P_{i} /P_{k} = \exp \left( {V_{i} } \right)/\exp \left( {V_{k} } \right). \)

    (see e.g. Train (2009): p. 45). With respect to RPL, the ratio of the probabilities becomes: \( P_{nit} /P_{nkt} = {\int \nolimits \mathop \smallint \nolimits \mathop \prod \nolimits_{t} \exp \left( {V_{nit} } \right)}/\mathop \sum \nolimits_{j} \exp \left( {V_{njt} } \right)f\left( {\beta |\Upomega } \right)d\beta /{\int \nolimits \mathop \smallint \nolimits \mathop \prod \nolimits_{t} \exp \left( {V_{nkt} } \right)}/\mathop \sum \nolimits_{j} \exp \left( {V_{njt} } \right)f\left( {\beta |\Upomega } \right)d\beta \). Then, the ratio depends on all alternatives other than \( i \) and \( k \), and IIA is totally relaxed by RPL.

  13. We could have employed the two one-sided convolutions test in Johnston and Duke (2008), but chose not to given the restrictions placed on the preference heterogeneities (see also Baskaran et al. 2010, p 1020).

  14. With regard to Changsha data, we obtain only one cross-term model.

  15. Although we could compare our results with those in Hammitt and Zhou (2006), their results concerning fatality risk suffer from scope insensitivity concerning the magnitude of the risk reduction. We thus omit the comparison.

  16. According to the Statistical Bureau of Jiangxi Province (2007), Jiujiang had a population of around 4.69 million and about 1.46 million households in 2006. The Statistical Bureau of Hunan Province (2007) reported that in 2006 Changsha had a population of about 6.28 million and some 1.87 million households.

References

  • Andrews-Speed P, Dow S, Wang A, Mao J, Wei B (1999) Do the power sector reforms in China reflect the interest of consumers? China Quart 158:430–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aunan K, Pátzay G, Aaheim HA, Seip HM (1998) Health and environmental benefits from air pollution reductions in Hungary. Sci Total Environ 212(2–3):245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran R, Cullen R, Colombo S (2010) Testing different types of benefit transfer in valuation of ecosystem services: New Zealand winegrowing case studies. Ecol Econ 69:1010–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J Econom 16:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, van der Zwaan B, Brink C, Eerens H (2009) Local air pollution and global climate change: a combined cost-benefit analysis. Res Energy Econ 31:161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Environmental Protection Agency (1998) The report on diesel exhaust URL: http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/de-fnds.htm (retrieved on June 5, 2010)

  • Carlsson F, Martinsson P (2007) Willingness to pay among Swedish households to avoid power outages: a random parameter Tobit model approach. Energy J 28(1):75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson F, Martinsson P (2008) Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay. Energy Econ 30(3):1232–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ (2007) Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. Eur Rev Agric Econ 34(3):321–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman RG, Staelin R (1982) Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. J Mark Res 19:288–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrzan K (1994) Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Mark Lett 5(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo S, Calatrava–Requena J, Hanley N (2007) Testing choice experiment for benefit transfer with preference heterogeneity. Am J Agric Econ 89(1):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Blaeij AT, Nunes PALD, van den Bergh JCJM (2007) ‘No-choice’ options within a nested logit model: one model is insufficient. Appl Econ 39(10):1245–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges W, Naughton M, Parsons G (1992) Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resour Res 28(3):675–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziegielewska DAP, Mendelshon R (2005) Valuing air quality in Poland. Environ Resour Econ 30:131–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel EP, Lupi F, Hoehn JP, Kaplowitz MD (2009) Split-sample tests of “no-opinion” responses in an attribute-based choice model. Land Econ 85(2):348–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH, Hensher DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp Res Part B 37:681–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt JK, Zhou Y (2006) The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study. Environ Resour Econ 33:399–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horii N (2008) Air pollution issues and the installation of desulphurization facilities. In: Horii N (ed) Sustainable development of Chinese economy: can the environmental and resource constraint be controlled? Institute of developing economies, JETRO, Chiba, pp 127–148 (In Japanese)

  • Ito K, Thurston GD (1996) Daily PM10/Mortality associations: an investigations of at-risk subpopulations. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 6(1):79–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwai K, Uchiyama I (2000) Diesel Sha Haishutsu Ryushi niyoru Hito Haigan Risk Shisan (Yosoku) (In Japanese), Risk Estimation for Human Lung Cancer Due to Diesel Exhaust Particles (Prediction). Taiki Kankyo Gakkaishi (J Jpn Soc Atmos Environ) 35(4):229–241

  • Japan Electric Power Information Center Inc. (2006) Power industry in China: the power situation of emerging great power country, Ohmsha Ltd (in Japanese)

  • Johnston RJ, Duke JM (2008) Benefit transfer equivalence tests with non-normal distributions. Environ Resour Econ 41:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RJ, Duke JM (2010) Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: evaluating the common wisdom. Resour Energy Econ 32(3):421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky I, Robb AL (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Statist 68:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WJ, Teschke K, Kauppinen T, Andersen A, Jäppinen P, Szadkowska-Stanczyk I, Pearce N, Persson B, Bergeret A, Augusto Facchini L, Kishi R, Kielkowski D, Rix BA, Henneberger P, Sunyer J, Colin D, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (2002) Mortality from lung cancer in workers exposed to sulfur dioxide in the pulp and paper industry. Environ Health Perspect 110(10):991–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Wang Y, Zhou A, Zhang S (1997) Cost-benefit analysis on IRP/DSM application: a case study in Shanghai. Energy Pol 25(10):837–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matsukawa I, Fujii Y (1994) Customer preferences for reliable power supply: using data on actual choices of back-up equipment. Rev Econ Statist 76(3):434–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1978) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison M, Bergland O (2006) Prospects for the use of choice modelling for benefit transfer. Ecol Econ 60:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison M, Bennett JW, Blamey R, Louviere JJ (2002) Choice modeling and tests of benefit transfer. Am J Agric Econ 84(1):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navrud S, Ready R (2007) Environmental value transfer: issues and methods. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poe GL, Giraud KL, Loomis JB (2005) Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. Am J Agric Econ 87(2):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaj P, Kypreos S (2007) Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: analysis with global multi-regional MARKAL model. Energy Pol 35:828–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelt D, Train K (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choice: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev Econ Statist 80(4):647–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe JC, Bennett JW (2006) Choice modelling and the transfer of environmental values. Edward Elgar, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan M, Skåtun D (2004) Modelling non-demanders in choice experiment. Health Econ 13:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg M (2008) A choice modelling analysis on the similarity between distribution utilities’ and industrial customers’ price and quality preferences. Energy Econ 30(3):1246–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Environmental Protection Agency (2006) China environmental year book 2006. China Statistical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Bureau of Hunan Province (2007) Hunan statistical yearbook. China Statistical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Bureau of Jiangxi Province (2007) Jiangxi statistical yearbook. China Statistical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenhof PA, Fulton F (2007) Factors affecting electricity generation in China: current situation and prospects. Technol Forecast Soc 74(5):663–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su CL, Teng JH (2007) Outage costs quantification for benefit-cost analysis of distribution automation systems. Elect Power Energy Sys 29:767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun T, Wang X, Ma X (2009) Relationship between the economic cost and the reliability of the electric power supply system in City: a case in Shanghai of China. Appl Energy 86:2262–2267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train KE (2009) Discrete choice methods with simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Tuan T, Seenprachawong U, Navrud S (2009) Comparing cultural heritage values in South East Asia: possibilities and difficulties in cross-country transfers of economic values. J Cult Herit 10:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassanadumrongdee S, Matsuoka S (2005) Risk perceptions and value of a statistical life for air pollution and traffic accidents: evidence from Bangkok, Thailand. J Risk Uncertain 30(3):261–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B (2007) An imbalanced development of coal and electricity industries in China. Energy Pol 35(10):4959–4986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Mauzerall DL (2006) Evaluating impacts of air pollution in china on public health: implications for future air pollution and energy policies. Atmos Environ 40:1706–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Mullahy J (2006) Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China. Sci Total Environ 367(1):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Z, Hao J, Chai F, Duan N, Chen Y, Li J, Chen F, Liu S, Pu W (2005) Air quality impact of the coal–fired power plants in the northern passageway of the China west–east power transmission project. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55:1816–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang M, Yu X (1996) China’s power management. Energy Pol 24(8):735–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Zhao C, Yu S, Hu Z (2007) Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Econ 29:1179–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai G, Suzuki T (2008) Public willingness to pay for environmental management, risk reduction and economic development: evidence from Tianjin, China. China Econ Rev 19:551–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai G, Suzuki T (2009) International benefit transfer related to coastal zones: evidence from Northeast Asia. Marine Resour Econ 24(2):171–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu F, Zheng Y, Guo X, Wang S (2005) Environmental impacts and benefits of regional power grid interconnections for China. Energy Pol 33:1797–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of an ex post evaluation of the 2007 ODA yen loan projects granted by the Japanese Bank for International Cooperation. This research was supported by a Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 22310030 and 23710057). The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments of Dr. Yohei Mitani as a discussant at the 2008 meeting of the Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, along with those of a number of other participants, including Dr. Kenji Takeuchi of the Graduate School of Economics at Kobe University and Dr. Takahiro Tsuge of the Faculty of Economics at Konan University. The authors also greatly appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewers and the cooperation of the survey respondents in Jiujiang and Changsha.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taro Ohdoko.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Description of the status quo in the questionnaire

Suppose you select the location of your residence by considering the electricity conditions in each location.

This questionnaire provides three alternative scenarios: Plan 1, Plan 2, and Plan 3. Each plan offers a different combination of the number of power breakdowns (frequency, times/year), duration of power breakdowns (the aggregate duration of power breakdowns, including regular maintenance, minutes/year), the number of deaths from cancer caused by air pollution (number of people per 10,000 citizens over a 70-year period who die from cancer caused by air pollution), and the cost of electricity supply (RMB/month).

Currently air pollution is severe in Jiujiang/Changsha, and causes cancer deaths at a rate of ____ (220.8 for Jiujiang and 292.2 for Changsha) people per 10,000 citizens over a 70-year period. This means that, out of 1,000 people who live in Jiujiang/Changsha for 70 years, about ____ (22 for Jiujiang and 29 for Changsha) will die from cancer caused by air pollution. Power stations also have a harmful influence on air quality.

Appendix 2: Example of a choice set

About this article

Cite this article

Ohdoko, T., Komatsu, S. & Kaneko, S. Residential preferences for stable electricity supply and a reduction in air pollution risk: a benefit transfer study using choice modeling in China. Environ Econ Policy Stud 15, 309–328 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-013-0061-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-013-0061-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation