Skip to main content
Log in

The price impacts of linking the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme to the Clean Development Mechanism

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many countries have begun to look increasingly toward the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as one of the key tools to increase the cost effectiveness of fulfilling their compliance requirements with the Kyoto Protocol. It is believed, from a theoretical point of view, that linking emissions trading schemes to the Kyoto Protocol’s flexible mechanisms can lead to a decrease in carbon prices and so a reduction of the overall compliance costs. This study provides an analysis of the relationship between the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and the CDM. The study considers the dynamic interactions between European allowance (EUA) prices and certified emission reduction (CER) prices, and uses time-series econometric techniques to test for the existence of long-term links and causal relations between the prices. Furthermore, the generalized impulse response analysis has been used to investigate temporal interactions among the variables. The results show that CER prices do not have a statistically significant effect on EUA prices; rather, it is the EUA prices that have driven CER prices during the period investigated. The constraint on the availability of CERs emanating from supplementarity and additionality criteria, as stipulated by the Kyoto Protocol, is one of the major factors that can be hypothesized to account for this finding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahman M, Burtraw D, Kruger JA, Zetterberg L (2007) The ten-year rule-allocation of emissions allowances in the EU emissions trading system. Energy Policy 35:1718–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberola E, Chevallier J, Cheze B (2008) Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005–07. Energy Policy 36:787–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anger N (2008) Emissions trading beyond Europe: linking schemes in a post-Kyoto world. Energy Economics 30:2028–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anger N, Bohringer C, Moslener U (2007) Macroeconomic impacts of the CDM: the role of investment barriers and regulations. ZEW discussion paper No. 07-026, Mannheim

  • Benz E, Trück S (2009) Modelling the price dynamic of CO2 emission allowances. Energy Economics 31:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz R, Rogge K, Schleich J (2006) EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012. Climate Policy 6:361–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Hoffmann T, Manrique-De-Lara-Penate C (2006) The efficiency costs of separating carbon markets under the EU emissions trading scheme: a quantitative assessment for Germany. Energy Economics 28:44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen AC, Wettestad J (2003) The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed. Climate Policy 3:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Convery FJ (2009) Reflections—the emerging literature on emissions trading in Europe. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 3:121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criqui P, Kitous A (2003) Impacts of linking JI and CDM credits to the EU ETS. Kyoto Protocol Implementation, KPI. Technical Report, B4-3040/2001/330760/MAR/E1

  • De Sepibus J (2008) Linking the EU emissions trading scheme to JI, CDM and post-2012 international offsets. NCCR Trade Regulation, Working paper no. 2008/18

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Estimation for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolado JJ, Lütkepohl H (1996) Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems. Econometric Reviews 15:369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council amending the directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms, COM (2003) 403

  • European Commission (2006) Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament on the assessment of national plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allow ances in the second period of the EU ETS accompanying commission decisions of 29 November 2006 on the national allocation plans of Germany etc., COM (2006) 725

  • European Union (EU) (2003) Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for trading in greenhouse gas emission allowances within the community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC.

  • European Commission, Brussels EU (2004) Directive 2004/101/EC, amending directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community, in respect to Kyoto Protocol’s project mechanisms. European Commission, Brussels. http://eur-Lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/1_338/1_33820041113en00180023.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cited EU (2008) Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008.

  • Official Journal of the European Union EU (2009) Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009.

  • Official Journal of the European Union Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vector. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jotzo F, Michaelowa A (2002) Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech accords. Climate Policy 2:179–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper G, Peterson S (2006) Emissions trading, CDM, JI, and more: the climate strategy of the EU. Energy Journal 27:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski D, Philips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null of stationary against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that the economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langrock T, Sterk W (2004) The supplementarity challenge: CDM, JI and EU emissions trading. Policy Paper 1/2004. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevere J (2005) Linking emission trading scheme: the EU ETS and the linking directive. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H, Kratzig M (2004) Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A, Stronzik M, Eckermann F, Hunt A (2003) Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. Climate Policy 3:261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran H, Shin Y (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economic Letters 58:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Point Carbon (2009a) Carbon shrugs off gas shortage concern. Point Carbon News. Carbon Market Europe. 8(1), 9 January

    Google Scholar 

  • Point Carbon (2009b) European commission unveils post-2012 vision. Point Carbon News. Carbon Market Europe. 8(4), 30 January

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw D (2007) How projects from beyond the EU will affect carbon trading. Kyoto Energy. http://www.kyotoenergy.net. Accessed 28 Aug 2008

  • TFS Green (2008) Clean Development Mechanism. TFS Green part of tradition. http://www.tfsgreen.com/global-markets/clean-development-mechanism/. Accessed 11 Aug 2008

  • Toda HY, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressive with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 66:225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2004) CDM information and guidebook (2nd edn). United Nations Environment Programme, Roskilde, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/CP/L.7/Add1, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2002) Report of the conference of the parties on its seventh session. 29 Oct–10 Nov, 2001, Marrakesh. http://unfcc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2008

  • UNFCCC (2009) CDM statistics. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://ghg.unfccc.int. Cited

  • Weitzman M (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Review of Economic Studies 61:477–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant JP, Hill JN (1999) Introduction and overview. Energy Journal, special issue on the costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A multi-model evaluation, pp 7–44

  • World Bank (2007) State and trends of the carbon market 2007. World Bank Report, Washington DC

  • World Bank (2008) State and trends of the carbon market 2008.

  • World Bank Report, Washington DC World Bank (2009) State and trends of the carbon market 2009. World Bank Report, Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Nazifi, F. The price impacts of linking the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme to the Clean Development Mechanism. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 12, 164–186 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0168-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0168-3

Key words

Navigation