Abstract
Current duplex ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (1%–15%, 16%–49%, 50%–69%, 70%–99%) may not be applicable to threshold stenoses used in symptomatic (North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET], Veterans’ Administration [VA]) and asymptomatic (Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study, VA) carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trials. This, along with increasing reports advocating CEA based on duplex results alone, prompted us to identify (1) new velocity criteria consistent with threshold stenoses used by these trials, and (2) velocity criteria with a high positive predictive value (PPV) (> 95%) and accuracy for detecting ⩾ 60% and ⩾ 70% ICA stenoses. This is the first study to propose criteria which can be used for all current CEA trials. The color duplex ultrasound (CDU) and arteriogram results of 462 ICAs were analyzed in blind fashion. Angiographic stenosis was calculated as in NASCET. Three velocity criteria (peak systolic velocity [PSV] of the ICA, end diastolic velocity [EDV] of the ICA, and the ratio of the PSV of the ICA/common carotid artery) were recorded and subjected to receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC) analysis to determine optimum criteria for identifying ICA stenoses of ⩾ 30%, ⩾ 50%, ⩾ 60%, and ⩾= 70%-99%. For ⩾ 30% stenosis (st): PSV ⩾ 120 cm/sec had an overall accuracy (OA) of 87%, sensitivity (sen.) of 93%, specificity (spec.) of 67%, PPV of 90%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 77%; for ⩾ 50% st: PSV ⩾ 140 cm/sec had an OA of 93%, sen. of 92%, spec, of 95%, PPV of 97%, and NPV of 89%; for ⩾ 60% st: PSV ⩾ 150 cm/sec and an EDV of ⩾ 65 had an OA of 90%, sen. of 82%, spec, of 97%, PPV of 96%, and NPV of 86%; for ⩾ 70%–99% st: PSV ⩾ 150 cm/sec and an EDV of ⩾ 90 had an OA of 92%, sen. of 85%, spec, of 95%, PPV of 91%, and NPV of 92%. An ICA-PSV and EDV of 150, 65, and 150,110 had the best PPV (⩾ 95%) in detecting ⩾ 60% and ⩾ 70% st, respectively. When these new criteria are used, CDU can accurately detect threshold stenoses used by various CEA trials. Selected velocities with a high PPV (> 95%) may be used as the sole preoperative imaging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Polak JF, Dobkin GR, O’Leary DH, et al. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy and reproducibility of color Doppler assisted duplex imaging. Radiology 1989;173:793–798.
Spadone DP, Barkmeier LD, Hodgson KJ, et al. Contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion: pitfall of correct ipsilateral classification — a study performed with color-flow imaging. J Vasc Surg 1990;11:642–649.
Londrey GL, Spadone DP, Hodgson KJ, et al. Does color-flow imaging improve the accuracy of duplex carotid evaluation? J Vasc Surg 1991;13:359–363.
Mattos MA, Hodgson KJ, Ramsey DE, et al. Identifying total carotid occlusion with color-flow duplex scanning. Eur J Vasc Surg 1992;6:204–210.
Zierler RE, Strandness DE, Jr. Noninvasive dynamic and real-time assessment of extracranial cerebrovasculature. In Wood JH, ed. Cerebral Blood Flow: Physiologic and Clinical Aspects. New York: McGraw Hill, 1987, pp 311–323.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453.
The Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Group. Study design for randomized prospective trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic atherosclerosis. Stroke 1989;20:844–849.
Veteran’s Administration Cooperative Study. Role of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 1986;17:534–539.
Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographie definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:152–159.
Faught WE, Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS, et al. Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: New velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:818–828.
Neale ML, Chambers JL, Kelly AT, et al. Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:642–649.
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421–1428.
Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, et al. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: Duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:989–994.
Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT. Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:697–705.
Burnham CB, Liguish J, Jr., Burnham SJ. Velocity criteria redefined for the 60% carotid stenosis. J Vasc Technology 1996;20(l):5–11.
Marshall WG, Jr., Kouchoukos NT, Murphy SF, Pelate C. Carotid endarterectomy based on duplex scanning without preoperative arteriography. Circulation 1988;78(Suppl I):I-1-1-5.
Geuder JW, Lamparello PJ, Riles TS, et al. Is duplex scanning sufficient evaluation before carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:193–201.
AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Boland JP, et al. Complications of arteriography in a recent series of 707 cases: Factors affecting outcome. Ann Vasc Surg 1993;7:122–129.
Haynes B, Thorpe K, Taylor W, et al. Poor performance of ultrasound in detecting high grade carotid stenosis (Abstract). Can J Surg 1992;35:446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
AbuRahma, A.F., Robinson, P.A., Strickler, D.L. et al. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Annals of Vascular Surgery 12, 349–358 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100169900166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100169900166