Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of the Ipsilateral Superficial Femoral Artery on Iliac Angioplasty

  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery (SFA) on percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the iliac arteries. From 1993 to 2005, 183 iliac lesions (179 stenoses, 4 occlusions; 37 common, 35 external, and 111 both iliac arteries) in 127 patients with disabling claudication [94 (52%)], rest pain [43 (23%)], and ulcer/gangrene [46 (25%)] were treated by PTA. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) iliac lesion types were A in 48 limbs (26%), B in 92 (50%), C in 38 (21%), and D in 5 (3%). Stents were placed selectively for primary angioplasty failure [residual stenosis (>30%) or pressure gradient (>5 mm Hg)]. Seventy-seven limbs (42%) had patent SFAs (66 intact/<50% stenosis and 11 previously bypassed, pSFA group), 28 (15%) had stenotic SFAs (50-99%, sSFA group), 51 (28%) had occluded SFAs (oSFA group), and 27 (15%) had concomitant SFA angioplasty (aSFA group). The Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting standards were followed to define outcomes. There were no perioperative deaths. Total complication rate was 1.1% (2/183, groin hematomas). The mean follow-up was 20 months (range 1-115). One hundred twenty-five limbs (68%) had PTA alone for iliac lesions, and 58 (32%) had iliac stenting (a total of 91 stents). TASC iliac lesion types and the status of the ipsilateral profunda femoris artery were not significantly different among the four groups. Seventeen limbs (9%) had subsequent infrainguinal bypass: three in the pSFA, seven in the oSFA, four in the sSFA, and three in the aSFA groups (p = 0.19). The primary patency rate was significantly decreased in the sSFA group (29% at 3 years, Kaplan-Meier log-rank, p < 0.0001) compared with the other three groups; however, there were no significant differences among the pSFA, oSFA, and aSFA groups (67%, 67%, and 86% at 3 years, respectively; p = 0.92). The continued clinical improvement rates were significantly decreased in the sSFA group (36% at 3 years, p = 0.0043) compared with the other three groups; however, there was no significant difference between the pSFA, oSFA, and aSFA groups (81%, 84%, and 75% at 3 years, respectively; p = 0.088). The assisted primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates were not significantly different among the four groups (p > 0.40). Stratified analysis in patients with TASC type B/type C, critical limb ischemia, or claudicants revealed similar results. The primary patency and continued clinical improvement were significantly decreased in patients with stenotic SFAs, suggesting that concomitant SFA angioplasty might improve iliac patency after iliac PTA for patients with stenotic SFAs. The presence of an occluded SFA did not adversely affect the outcomes of iliac PTA. During iliac PTA, a stenotic SFA should be considered for revascularization via endovascular means but an occluded SFA can be observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palmaz JC, Laborde JC, Rivera FJ, Encarnacion CE, Lutz JD, Moss JG. Stenting of the iliac arteries with the Palmaz stent: experience from a multicenter trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1992;15:291–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston KW. Iliac arteries: reanalysis of results of balloon angioplasty. Radiology 1993;186:207–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Timaran CH, Prault TL, Stevens SL, Freeman MB, Goldman MH. Iliac artery stenting versus surgical reconstruction for TASC (Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type B and type C iliac lesions. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan MT, Childs MB, Bacharach JM, Gray BH, Piedmonte MR. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and primary stenting of the iliac arteries in 288 patients. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:829–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballard JL, Bergan JJ, Singh P, Yonemoto H, Killeen JD. Aortoiliac stent deployment versus surgical reconstruction: analysis of outcome and cost. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:94–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Funovics MA, Lackner B, Cejna M, et al. Predictors of long-term results after treatment of iliac artery obliteration by transluminal angioplasty and stent deployment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2002;25:397–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Treiman GS, Schneider PA, Lawrence PF, Pevec WC, Bush RL, Ichikawa L. Dose stent placement improve the results of ineffective or complicated iliac artery angioplasty? J Vasc Surg 1998;28:104–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Demasi RJ, Snyder SO, Wheeler JR, et al. Intraoperative iliac artery stents: combination with infra-inguinal revascularization procedures. Am Surg 1994;60:854–859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marin ML, Veith FJ, Sanchez LA, et al. Endovascular aortoiliac grafts in combination with standard infrainguinal arterial bypasses in the management of limb-threatening ischemia: preliminary report. J Vasc Surg 1995;22:316–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Siskin G, Darling RC 3rd, Stainken B, et al. Combined use of iliac artery angioplasty and infrainguinal revascularization for treatment of multilevel atherosclerotic disease. Ann Vasc Surg 1999;13:45–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Faries PL, Brophy D, LoGerfo FW, et al. Combined iliac angioplasty and infrainguinal revascularization surgery are effective in diabetic patients with multilevel arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2001;15:67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brewster DC, Perler BA, Robison JG, Darling RC. Aortofemoral graft for multilevel occlusive disease. Predictors of success and need for distal bypass. Arch Surg 1982;117:1593–1600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Timaran CH, Ohki T, Gargiulo NJ 3rd, et al. Iliac artery stenting in patients with poor distal runoff: influence of concomitant infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:479–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarkar R, Ro KM, Obrand DI, Ahn SS. Lower extremity vascular reconstruction and endovascular surgery without preoperative angiography. Am J Surg 1998;176:203–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dormandy JA. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000;31(Suppl):S1-S296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:517–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn SS, Rutherford RB, Becker GJ, et al. Reporting standards for lower extremity arterial endovascular procedures. Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:1103–1107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS. Long-term outcomes and predictors of iliac angioplasty with selective stenting. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:466–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prendiville EJ, Burke PE, Colgan MP, Wee BL, Moore DJ, Shanik DG. The profunda femoris: a durable outflow vessel in aortofemoral surgery. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:23–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearce WH, Kempczinski RF. Extended autogenous profundaplasty and aortofemoral grafting: an alternative to synchronous distal bypass. J Vasc Surg 1984;1:455–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ouriel K, DeWeese JA, Ricotta JJ, Green RM. Revascularization of the distal profunda femoris artery in the reconstructive treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1987;6:217–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waibel PP, Wolff G. The collateral circulation in occlusions of the femoral artery: an experimental study. Surgery 1966;60:912–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin P, Jamieson C. The rationale for and measurement after profundaplasty. Surg Clin North Am 1974;54:95–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lofberg AM, Karacagil S, Ljungman C, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries in limbs with chronic critical lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:114–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jamsen TS, Manninen HI, Jaakkola PA, Matsi PJ. Long-term outcome of patients with claudication after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries. Radiology 2002;225:345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Surowiec SM, Davies MG, Eberly SW, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:269–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel S. Ahn MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Kudo, T., Rigberg, D.A., Reil, T.D. et al. The Influence of the Ipsilateral Superficial Femoral Artery on Iliac Angioplasty. Ann Vasc Surg 20, 502–511 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-006-9053-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-006-9053-8

Keywords

Navigation