Skip to main content
Log in

Late-onset Type II Endoleaks and the Incidence of Secondary Intervention

  • Papers Presented to the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Type II endoleaks are a recognized complication of endoluminal treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. In order to better understand the natural history of type II endoleaks and their influence on secondary procedures, we examined our experience with patients who developed isolated type II endoleaks 6 months or more after their original procedure. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent endoluminal repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with bifurcated endoluminal devices at a single institution from June 1996 to June 2000. Endoleak surveillance was performed on all patients by using a defined CT angiogram protocol. Patients with definitive and isolated type II endoleaks on CT angiogram were identified. Patients with indeterminate endoleaks or a combination of different types of endoleaks were excluded. Data were analyzed on the basis of early (<6 months) or late occurrence of isolated type II endoleak. Fifty patients were identified with isolated type II endoleaks. Of these patients, 20 (40%) had endoleaks discovered before the 6-month follow-up interval whereas the majority (60%) had new type II leaks discovered at least 6 months after their initial procedure. The timing of endoleak occurrence did not significantly influence the rate of spontaneous endoleak resolution between the early- (<6 months) and late-onset (>6 months) groups, which was nearly identical (40% vs. 43%). Ten patients in the early group and seven of the late-onset group required secondary intervention for treatment of type II endoleak (50% vs. 23%; NS). Three patients in the early group underwent surgical conversion (vs. 0 patients in the late-onset group). The mortality rate was not significantly different between groups (15% vs. 7%). Most isolated type II endoleaks in this patient population occurred 6 months or more after initial endoluminal repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Timing of type II endoleak occurrence did not significantly affect the rates of spontaneous resolution or mortality. Although differences were observed in the number of patients receiving secondary interventions, these findings did not reach statistical difference. All patients who required surgical conversion had early type II endoleaks. There were no observed ruptures in patients with increased aneurysm size treated with secondary intervention or those with stable aneurysm volumes who were followed without intervention. The continued development of type II endoleaks beyond the perioperative period supports the need for continued endoleak surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JC Parodi JC Palmaz HD Barone (1991) ArticleTitleTransfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 5 491–499 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C38nks1E%3D Occurrence Handle1837729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. T Ohki FJ Veith P Shaw et al. (2001) ArticleTitleIncreasing incidence of midterm and long-term complications after endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a note of caution based on a 9-year experience. Ann Surg 234 322–334 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200109000-00006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GW Schurink NJ Aarts JM van Baalen et al. (1991) ArticleTitleLate endoleak after endovascular therapy for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17 448–450 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejvs.1998.0599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. SN Tuerff CB Rockman PJ Lamparello et al. (2002) ArticleTitleAre type II (branch vessel) endoleaks really benign? Ann Vasc Surg 16 50–54 Occurrence Handle11904804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. GH White W Yu J May et al. (1997) ArticleTitleEndoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 4 152–168 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA38fks1E%3D Occurrence Handle9185003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. RA Wain ML Marin T Ohki et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEndoleaks after endovascular graft treatment of aortic aneurysms: classification, risk factors, and outcome. J Vasc Surg 27 69–78 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7jsVemuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9474084

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. TS Maldonado PJ Gagne (2003) ArticleTitleControversies in the management of type II “branch” endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovasc Surg 37 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. CK Zarins RA White KJ Hodgson et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEndoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: Aneurx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 32 90–107 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2000.108278 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czjs1OksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10876210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. PL Harris SR Vallabhaneni P Desgranges et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIncidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the Eurostar experience. J Vasc Surg 32 739–749 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FjtFKruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11013038

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JS Matsumura WS Moore (1998) ArticleTitleClinical consequence of periprosthetic leak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Endovascular Technologies Investigators. J Vasc Surg 27 6006–6013

    Google Scholar 

  11. RJ Hinchliffe R Singh-Ranger JR Davidson et al. (2001) ArticleTitleRupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to type II endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22 563–565

    Google Scholar 

  12. RA White CE Donayre I Walot et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAAA rupture following endoluminal graft deployment: report of a predictable event. J Endovasc Surg 7 257–262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltVCjug%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. FJ Veith RA Baum T Ohki et al. (2002) ArticleTitleNature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg . 1029–1035 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2002.123095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. JT Lee J Lee I Aziz et al. (2002) ArticleTitleStent-graft migration following endovascular repair of aneurysms with large proximal necks: anatomical risk factors and long-term sequelae. J Endovasc Ther 9 652–664 Occurrence Handle12431151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. FN Parent GH Meier V Godziachvili et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5-year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg 35 474–481 Occurrence Handle11877694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. FR Arko KA Filis SA Siedel et al. (2003) ArticleTitleIntrasac flow velocities predict sealing of type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 37 8–15 Occurrence Handle12514572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. S Haulon C Lions EP McFadden et al. (1998) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 28 657–663

    Google Scholar 

  18. S Thurnher M Cejna (2002) ArticleTitleImaging of aortic stent-grafts and endoleaks. Radiol Clin North Am. 40 799–833 Occurrence Handle12171186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. RA White CE Donayre I Walot et al. (2001) ArticleTitleComputed tomography assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology after endograft exclusion. J Vasc Surg 33 S1–10 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mva.2001.111680 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lslynsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11174806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ND Forester D Parry D Kessel et al. (2002) ArticleTitleIschaemic sciatic neuropathy: an important complication of embolisation of type II endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 24 462–463 Occurrence Handle10.1053/ejvs.2002.1718 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nnsFWmug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12435350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. RL Bush PH Lin RS Ronson et al. (2001) ArticleTitleColonic necrosis subsequent to catherter-directed thrombin embolization of inferior mesenteric artery via the superior mesenteric artery: a complication of the management of a type II endoleak. J Vasc Surg 34 1119–1122 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnpsFWltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11743570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney A. White MD.

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, C.J., Kim, B., Aziz, I. et al. Late-onset Type II Endoleaks and the Incidence of Secondary Intervention . Ann Vasc Surg 18, 26–31 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-003-0098-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-003-0098-7

Keywords

Navigation