Abstract
Isolated spontaneous renal artery dissection is a rare condition that can result in renal parenchymal loss and severe hypertension. Although several risk factors have been identified in association with renal artery dissection, the natural history is not well defined. The rarity and nonspecific presentation of the disease often lead to diagnostic delay. That, coupled with the anatomic limitations imposed by dissection into small branch arteries, frequently precludes successful revascularization. Over a 12-month period, four cases of spontaneous renal artery dissection (SRAD) were treated at a single institution. The patients (ages 44–58 years) presented with acute onset of abdominal/flank pain, fever, and hematuria. Diagnostic work-up included an abdominal CT scan revealing segmental renal infarction. Angiographic evaluation was diagnostic for renal artery dissection in all cases. In one case there was evidence of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), and in a second there was acute dissection superimposed upon atherosclerotic disease. Diagnosis was made within 12–72 hr of the onset of symptoms. All patients were managed expectanly with anticoagulation. Two patients were known to have a history of hypertension pior to admission. All four patients have required antihypertensive treatment following dissection, but the condition has been easily controlled. Renal function has remained stable in all cases. None of the four cases required exploration. Two of the four patients underwent repeat angiographic evaluation for recurrent symptoms of pain. In the case of the patient with FMD, a new dissection was seen in the contraiateral renal artery, and in the second, repeat angiogram revealed proximal remodeling of the dissected artery. Management strategies for SRAD include surgical revascularization, endovascular intervention, and observation with or without anticoagulation. The available literature does not demonstrate a clear benefit of treatment with any of these modalities. In the short term, the combination of antico-agulation and expectant management appears to produce satisfactory outcomes for this difficult problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gewertz BL, Stanley JC, Fry WJ. Renal artery dissection. Arch Surg 1977;112:409–414.
Foord AG, Lewis RD. Primary dissecting aneurysms of peripheral and pulmonary arteries: dissection hemorrhage of media. Arch Pathol 1959;68:553–577.
Lok SY, Chalvardjian A, Common AA. Primary renal artery dissection. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995;1:54–56.
Reilly LM, Cunningham CG, Maggisano R, Erhenfeld WK, Stoney RJ. The role of arterial reconstruction in spontaneous renal artery dissection. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:468–479.
Lacombe M. Isolated spontaneous dissection of the renal artery. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:385–391.
Beroniade V, Roy P, Froment D, Pison C. Primary renal artery dissection. Am J Nephrol 1987;7:382–389.
Alamir A, Middendorf DF, Baker P, Nahman NS Jr, Fontaine AB, Hebert LA. Renal artery dissection causing renal infraction in otherwise healthy men. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30:851–855.
Acconcia A, Manganelli A. Dissecting aneurysm of renal artery owing to subadventitial angioma. J Urol 1978:119: 268–270.
Edwards SS, Stanson AW, Holley KE, Sheps SG. Isolated renal artery dissection. Presentation, evaluation, management and pathology. Mayo Clin Proc 1982;57:564–571.
Slavis S, Hodge EE, Novick AC. Surgical treatment for isolated dissection of the renal artery. J Urol 1990;144:233–237.
Mori H, Hayashi K, Tasaki T, Hori T, Yamasaki T, Amamoto Y. Spontaneous resolution of bilateral renal artery dissection: a case report. J Urol 1986;135:114–116.
Smith BM, Holcomb GW III, Richie RE, Dean RH. Renal artery dissection. Ann Surg 1984;200:134–146.
Goldafarb R, Pool JL, Wheeler T. Isolated renal artery dissection secondary to medial degeneration. J Urol 1988;139:346–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Ramamoorthy, S.L., Vasquez, J.C., Taft, P.M. et al. Nonoperative management of acute spontaneous renal artery dissection. Annals of Vascular Surgery 16, 157–162 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0154-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-001-0154-0