Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of tooth sectioning technique and various risk factors in reducing the IAN injury following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study on 100 patients presented with a mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar in close proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve canal (IANC) was done to evaluate the efficacy of tooth sectioning in reducing the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during their surgical removal. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, where tooth sectioning was not performed, and group B, where tooth sectioning was performed. Patients were recalled 7 days, 15 days, 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively for evaluation of nerve injury and its recovery. A total of 13 patients suffered from nerve damage out of which 10 patients (10/50 or 20 %) belonged to group A and 3 patients (3/50 or 6 %) belonged to group B. All patients showed complete recovery from nerve damage within 6 months except 1 patient. The result of the study showed that tooth sectioning significantly reduces the incidence of nerve damage by 14 %. Deviation of the IANC, increased depth of the impacted tooth, intraoperative hemorrhage within socket/nerve exposure, and increased duration of procedure were found to be the significant risk factors associated with nerve injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmichael FA, McGowan DA (1992) Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:78–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yadav S, Sachdeva A, Verma A (2011) Inferior alveolar nerve damage following removal of mandibular third molar teeth. Journal of Innovative Dentistry 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Genu PR, Vasconcelos BCE (2008) Influence of tooth section technique in alveolar nerve damage after surgery of impacted lower third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:923–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Libersa P, Savignat M, Tonnel A (2007) Neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve: a retrospective study of complaints in a 10-year period. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1486–1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landi L, Manicone PF, Piccinelli S, Raia A, Raia R (2010) Staged removal of horizontally impacted third molars to reduce risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rood JP, Shehab BAAN (1990) The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, Tennant M (2006) Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Aust Dent J 51(1):64–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tay ABG, Go WS (2004) Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:592–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulicher G (2001) Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30(4):306–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C (2001) Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:377–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blondeau F, Daniel NG (2007) Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. JCDA 73(4):325 e

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed A, Mohamed F, Hattab K (2009) Surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. Jamahiriya medical Journal 9(4):272–275

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leung YY, Cheung LK (2011) Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: a literature review of prospective studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brann CR, Brickley MR, Shepherd JP (1999) Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery. Br Dent J 186:514–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB (2007) Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: a clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sandstedt P, Sorenser S (1995) Neurosensory disturbances of trigeminal nerve. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:498–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wofford DT, Miller RI (1987) Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff RB, Kaban LB, Dodson TB (2003) Panoramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:417–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sedaghatfar M, August MA, Dodson TB (2005) Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell GW (2004) Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:21–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallesio C, Mattia B, Emanuele R, Paolo B (2010) Surgical extraction of impacted inferior third molars at risk for inferior alveolar nerve injury. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 21(6):2003–2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leung YY, Cheung LK (2011) Correlation of radiographic signs, inferior dental nerve exposure, and deficit in third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1873–1879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Drage N, Renton T (2002) Inferior alveolar nerve injury related to mandibular third molar surgery: an unusual case presentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:358–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K et al (2007) Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1303–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N et al (2007) A comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, Silva ED, Caldas Ade F Jr, Pita Neto IC (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:256–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pogrel A, Dorfman D, Fallah H (2009) The anatomic structure of the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in the third molar region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2452–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bataineh AB (2001) Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1012–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miloro M, DaBell J (2005) Radiographic proximity of the mandibular third molar to the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100(5):545–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hillerup S (2008) Iatrogenic injury to inferior alveolar nerve: etiology, signs and symptoms and observation on recovery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:704–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, N., Thomas, S., Prabhu, S. et al. Influence of tooth sectioning technique and various risk factors in reducing the IAN injury following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20, 149–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0540-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0540-3

Keywords

Navigation