Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of intra-space injection of Twin mix versus intraoral-submucosal, intramuscular, intravenous and per-oral administration of dexamethasone on post-operative sequelae after mandibular impacted third molar surgery: a preliminary clinical comparative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A prospective randomised double-blind study was undertaken to compare the effects of intra-space injection of ‘Twin mix’ versus intraoral-submucosal, intramuscular, intravenous and per-oral administration of dexamethasone on post-operative sequelae after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Material and methods

A randomised double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 60 patients with class II position B impaction of mandibular third molars. Sixty transalveolar extractions were performed prospectively with ten patients randomly allocated to each of the six study groups (group T: intra-space injection of Twin mix; group S: submucosal dexamethasone; group M: intramuscular dexamethasone; group V: intravenous dexamethasone; group O: per-oral dexamethasone; group C: control group, no dexamethasone). A ten-point visual analogue scale was used to assess the overall pain intensity/patient discomfort, and specific facial measurements were recorded to assess the post-operative facial swelling. Maximal mouth opening was compared pre and post-operatively to assess the trismus.

Results

Mean operative visual analogue scale scores did not show statistical variation, and post-operative visual scores indicated better patient comfort in the steroid groups with statistically significant difference between group T and the control group on the first, third and the seventh post-operative day. Mean increase in distances between tragus and soft tissue menton to assess facial swelling showed strong statistically significant difference between the first and the third post-operative day between the control group and group T (p value <0.0001). Association of trismus was found less with the steroid treatment groups when compared to the control group.

Conclusion

Steroid groups had a better clinical outcome with improved quality of life post-operatively when compared to the nonsteroid study group. Intra-space injection of dexamethasone in pterigomandibular space as Twin mix was found to have similar clinical effects as conventional methods of administering steroids via intraoral-submucosal, intramuscular, intravenous and per-oral routes. This, however, is a small study which would now benefit from larger numbers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colorado-Bonnin M, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C (2006) Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35(4):343–347

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markiewicz MR, Brady MF, Ding EL, Dodson TB (2008) Corticosteroids reduce postoperative morbidity after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66(9):1881–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirkman, T.W. (1996) Statistics to Use. http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/ Accessed 26 Dec 2012

  4. Ata-Ali J, Ata-Ali F, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha M (2011) Corticosteroids use in controlling pain, swelling and trismus after lower third molar surgery. J Clin Exp Dent 3(5):e469–e475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhargava D, Sreekumar K, Rastogi S, Deshpande A, Chakravorty N. A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of Twin-mix and 2 % lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 doi:10.1007/s10006-012-0372-3

  6. Sortino F, Cicciù M (2011) Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 8(4):162–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiwana PS, Foy SP, Shugars DA, Marciani RD, Conrad SM, Phillips C et al (2005) The impact of intravenous corticosteroids with third molar surgery in patients at high risk for delayed health-delated quality of life and clinical recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, Borgonovo A, Beretta M, Farronato D, Santoro F (2007) Effect of submucosal injection of dexamethasone on postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(11):2218–2226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Majid OW (2011) Submucosal dexamethasone injection improves quality of life measures after third molar surgery: a comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(9):2289–2297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darpan Bhargava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhargava, D., Sreekumar, K. & Deshpande, A. Effects of intra-space injection of Twin mix versus intraoral-submucosal, intramuscular, intravenous and per-oral administration of dexamethasone on post-operative sequelae after mandibular impacted third molar surgery: a preliminary clinical comparative study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18, 293–296 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0412-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0412-7

Keywords

Navigation