Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative Entfernung von Weisheitszähnen

  • Leitlinie
  • Published:
Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 December 2006

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Absi EG, Shepherd JP (1993) A comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methods. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:149–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berge TI (1996) Incidence of infections requiring hospitalization associated with partially erupted third molars. Acta Odontol Scand 54:309–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berge TI (1996) Incidence of large third-molar-associated cystic lesions requiring hospitalization. Acta Odontol Scand 54:327–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berge TI (1996) Complications requiring hospitalization after third-molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand 54:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunstan SP, Sugar AW (1997) Fractures after removal of wisdom teeth. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 396–397

  6. Eklund SA, Pittmann JL (2001) Third-molar removal patterns in an insured population. J Am Dent Assoc 132(4):469–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eliav E, Gracely RH (1998) Sensory changes in the territory of the inferior alveolar nerves following lower third molar extraction. Pain 77:191–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Filippi A, Irnich G, Kirschner H, Pohl Y (2000) Lokale Beeinflussbarkeit der Wundheilung nach Osteotomie dritter Molaren. Quintessenz 51:337–344

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fuselier JC, Ellis EE, Dodson B (2002) Do mandibular third molars alter the risk of angle fracture. J Oral maxillofac Surg 60:514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gülicher D, Gerlach KL (2000) Inzidenz, Risikofaktoren und Verlauf von Sensibilitätsstörungen nach operativer Weisheitszahnentfernung. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 4:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hägler G, Reich RH (2002) Risiko und Vermeidung von Läsionen des N. lingualis bei der Weisheitszahnosteotomie. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harradine NWT, Pearson MH, Toth B (1998) The Effect of Extraction of Third Molars on Late Lower Incisor Crowding: A Randomized Controlled Trial. B J Orthod 25:117–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugoson A, Kugelberg CF (1988) The prevalence of third molars in a swedish population. Community Dent Health 5:121–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knutsson K, Brehmer B, Lysell L, Rohlin M (1996) Pathoses associated with mandibular third molars subjected to removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P (2001) Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: Findings from a population-based New-Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:150–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kugelberg CF (1990) Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:341–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGrath C, Comfort MB, Lo ECM, Luo Y (2003) Changes in life quality following third molar surgery – the immediate postoperative period. British Dent J 194:265–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA (1998) Unicystic ameloblastoma. A review of 193 cases from the literature. Oral Oncology 317–325

  19. Pratt CA, Hekmar M, Barnard JDW, Zaki GA (1998) Indications for third molar surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:105–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Punwutikorn J, Waikakul A, Ochareon P (1999) Symptoms of unerupted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 87:305–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rakprasitkul S (2001) Pathologic changes in the pericoronal tissues of unerupted third molars. Quintessence Int 32:633–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Renton T, McGurk M (2001) Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:423–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruta DA, Bissias E, Ogston S, Ogden GR (2000) Assessing health outcomes after extraction of third molars: the postoperative symptom severity (PoSSe) scale. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 480–487

  24. SIGN, Management of unerupted and impacted third molar teeth. SIGN Publication 43:(2000)

  25. Smith AC, Barry SE, Chiong AY, Hadzakis D, Kha SL, Mok SC, Sable DL (1997) Inferior alveolar nerve damage following removal of mandibular third molar teeth. A prospective study using panoramic radiography. Aust Dent J 42:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Song F, O'Meara S, Wilson P, Golder S, Kleijnen J (2000) The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth. Health Technol Assess 4:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA (2002) Wundheilung nach operativer Weisheitszahnentfernung. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 74–84

    Google Scholar 

  28. Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C (2001) Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: A prospective study of 1117 sugical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:377–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ventä I, Lindqvist C, Ylipaavalniemi P (1998) Malpractice claims for permanent nerve injuries related to third molar removals. Acta Odontol Scand 56:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Worrall SF, Riden K, Haskell R, Corrigan AM (1998) UK National Third Molar project: the initial report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:14–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Ikeda M, Hasegawa T (1999) Root resorption of mandibular second molar teeth associated with the presence of the third molars. Aust Dent J 44:112–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yamaoka M, Tambo A, Furusawa K (1997) Incidence of inflammation in completely lower third molars. Aust Dent J 42:153–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshii T, Hamamoto Y, Muraoka S, Kohjitani A, Teranobu O, Furudoi S, Komori T (2001) Incidence of deep fascial space infection after surgical removal of the mandibular third molars. J Infect Chemother 55–57

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany

    M. Kunkel, J. Becker, P. Boehme, P. Engel, G. Göz, D. Haessler (†), D. Heidemann, E. Hellwig, I. Kopp, B. Kreusser, H.-Ch. Lauer, H. Luckey, E. Reinhard, P. Schopf, R. Singer, H. Terheyden, J. C. Türp, M. Weber, D. Weingart, R. Werkmeister & W. Wagner

Authors
  1. M. Kunkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Boehme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Engel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Göz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Haessler (†)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. Heidemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Hellwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. I. Kopp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. B. Kreusser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. H.-Ch. Lauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. H. Luckey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. E. Reinhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. P. Schopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. R. Singer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. H. Terheyden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. J. C. Türp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. M. Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. D. Weingart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. R. Werkmeister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. W. Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kunkel.

Additional information

Zu dieser Leitlinie existiert ein Vorwort unter http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10.1007/s10006-006-0010-z

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-006-0040-6

Appendices

Appendix 1: Informationen zum Text

Erläuterungen zur Evidenzbewertung

Ia:

Systematische Übersicht randomisierter kontrollierter Studien

Ib:

Mindestens eine randomisierte kontrollierte Studie

IIa:

Mindestens eine gut geplante kontrollierte Studie ohne Randomisierung

IIb:

Mindestens eine gut geplante quasi experimentelle Studie

III:

Gut geplante, nicht experimentelle deskriptive Studien

IV:

Expertenmeinung

Empfehlungsgrad

A:

Starker Empfehlungscharakter

B:

Mäßiger Empfehlungscharakter

O:

Güterabwägung im Einzelfall

Angaben zur Erstellung der Leitlinie

Die Erstellung der Leitlinie erfolgte im Auftrag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie und der Zahnärztlichen Zentralstelle Qualitätssicherung. Das Konsensusverfahren wurde durch die Zahnärztliche Zentralstelle Qualitätssicherung koordiniert.

Verfahren der Konsensusbildung: Nominaler Gruppenprozess, Moderation: Fr. Priv. Doz. Dr. Ina Kopp (AWMF).

Autoren der Leitlinien und Teilnehmer am Konsensusprozess: siehe Tabelle 2.

Tabelle 2 Autoren der Leitlinien und Teilnehmer am Konsensusprozess
Full size table

Appendix 2: Weiterführende Informationen

Links

Im Zusammenhang relevante wissenschaftliche Stellungnahmen der DGZMK:

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunkel, M., Becker, J., Boehme, P. et al. Operative Entfernung von Weisheitszähnen. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 10, 205–211 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-006-0007-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-006-0007-7

Search

Navigation