Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical insight into different energetic groups on the performance of energetic materials 2,5,7,9-tetranitro-2,5,7,9-tetraazabicyclo[4,3,0]nonane-8-one

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Energetic materials are a class of materials containing explosive groups or containing oxidants and combustibles. The optimization of energetic materials has a significant impact on the development of industry and national defense. For high-energy density compounds (HEDC) that have not been synthesized or are dangerous to experimental operation, it is of guiding significance to predict its energy level, physicochemical properties, and safety through molecular design and theoretical calculation. Cyclic urea nitramine series compounds are a type of energetic compounds with high density and excellent detonation performance. In this study, 2,5,7,9-tetranitro-2,5,7,9-tetraazabicyclo[4,3,0]nonane-8-one (K-56) was used as the parent structure, and 36 energetic derivatives were designed. The effects of introducing single and multiple substituents on the electronic structure, energy gap, heat of formation, detonation performance, thermal stability, thermodynamic parameters, and surface electrostatic potential of K-56 and its derivatives were discussed in detail. The results exhibit the following: (1) the single substitution of -C(NO2)3 (A6) can reduce the detonation velocity of K-56 by 11.9 % and the detonation pressure by 19.8 %, while the double substitution of -C(NO2)3 (B6) can increase the density of K-56 by 11.6 %, the detonation velocity by 10.9 %, and the detonation pressure by 31 %. (2) The heat of formation of K-56 (−110.0 kJ mol−1) increased by 324.18 % and 628.81 %, respectively, proving that -N3 is an extremely effective group to improve HOF. (3) The thermal stability of the derivatives generated by the monosubstitution of the target group on the six-membered ring is better than that of the parent compound.

Methods

Gaussian16 and Multiwfn 3.8 packages are the software for calculation. In this study, the parent structure K-56 and its derivatives were optimized at the B3LYP/6-311G (d,p) level to obtain the zero point energy and thermal correction data of all compounds. Then the vibration analysis of the optimized structure is carried out to confirm that its configuration is stable. Then the M06-2X-D3/def2-TZVPP basis set is used to calculate the single point energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We confirm the availability of all the data and materials in this manuscript. The manuscript has full control of all primary data, and the authors agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Code availability

N/A.

References

  1. Madhukar AB, Mahadev T, Zarko VE, Pramod M (2019) Recent advances in safe synthesis of energetic materials: an overview. Combust Explos Shock Waves 55:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508219030018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Venugopal T, Haixiang G, Jean’ne MS (2011) Trinitromethyl-substituted 5-nitro- or 3-azo-1,2,4-triazoles: synthesis, characterization, and energetic properties. J Am Chem Soc 133:6464–6471. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2013455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Renfa Z,Xiaosong X, Peng M, Congming M, Diandian Z, Yong P, Juncheng J (2022) High-energy materials based on 1H-tetrazole and furoxan: molecular design and screening. J Mol Struct 1250: 131900. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2021.131900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lina H, Xuqin L, Congming M, Peng M, Yong P, Juncheng J (2022) Thermodynamic properties, decomposition kinetics of 2-(5-amino-2H-tetrazol-1-yl)-4-amine-3,5-dinitropyridine. J Mol Model 28:79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-022-05066-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wenxin X, Renfa Z, Xiaosong X, Congming M, Peng M, Yong P, Juncheng J (2021) Theoretical studies of novel high energy density materials based on oxadiazoles. J Mol Model 27:204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04805-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Qiong W, Linghua T, Zusheng H (2015) A new design strategy on cage insensitive high explosives: symmetrically replacing carbon atoms by nitrogen atoms followed by the introduction of N-oxides. RSC Adv 5:93607–93614. https://doi.org/10.1039/2046-2069/2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiong W, Weihua Z, Heming X (2014) A new design strategy for high-energy low-sensitivity explosives: combining oxygen balance equal to zero, a combination of nitro and amino groups, and N-oxide in one molecule of 1-amino-5-nitrotetrazole-3N-oxide. J Mater Chem A 2:13006–13015. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA01879F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sikder AK, Sikder N (2004) A review of advanced high performance, insensitive and thermally stable energetic materials emerging for military and space applications. J Hazard Mater 112:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.04.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goede P, Wingborg N, Bergman H (2001) Syntheses and analyses of N,N′-dinitrourea. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 26:17–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4087(200101)26:13.3.CO;2-R

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Il'Yasov SG, Lobanova AA, Popov NI, Sataev RR (2002) Chemistry of urea nitro derivatives: IV. Reaction of N,N′-dinitrourea with formaldehyde. Russ J Org Chem 38:1739–1743. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022555327527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pagoria PF, Lee GS, Mitchell AR, Schmidt RD (2002) A review of energetic materials synthesis. Thermochim Acta 384:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00805-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peng M, Yong P, Juncheng J, Shunguan Z (2018) Molecular dynamic simulation and density functional theory insight into the nitrogen rich explosive 1,5-diaminotetrazole(DAT). Procedia Eng 211:546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boileau J, Emeury J, Kehren J (1974) Tetranitroglycoluril, its manufacture and use as an explosive:DE2435651C3 https://patents.google.com/patent/DE2435651C3/en#patentCitations

  14. Yuye X, Zhengqian C, Naiyan W (1991) Relationships between properties and electronic structure of cyclourea nitro-amine compounds-IV. Study of Thermodecomposition. Chinese. J Anal Chem 19(12):1387–1391

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graindorge HR, Lescrop PA (1995) Synthesis of 2,5,7,9-tetranitro-tetraazabicyclo(4,3,0)nonanone (K56) and derivatives. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sikder AK, Bhokare GM, Sarwade DB (2001) Synthesis, characterization and thermal behaviour of 2,4,6,8-tetranitro-2,4,6,8-tetraazabicyclo [3.3.1] nonane-3,7-dione (TNPDU) and one of its methylene analogues. Propellants, Explos Pyrotech 26(2):63–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilardi R, Flippen-Anderson JL, George C (1990) Structures of 1,3,5-trinitro-2-oxo-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (I) and 1,4-dinitro-2,5-dioxo-1,4-diazacyclohexane (II). Acta Crystallogr C Cryst Struct Commun 46:706–708. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270189012114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lina H, Xuqin L, Diandian Z, Lie Q, Congming M, Peng M, Juncheng J (2020) Theoretical studies on the performance of HMX with different energetic groups. ACS Omega 5:29922–29934. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Politzer P, Jane SM (1996) Relationships between dissociation energies and electrostatic potentials of CNO2 bonds: applications to impact sensitivities. J Mol Struct 376:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2860(95)09066-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Byrd EFC, Rice BM (2006) Improved prediction of heats of formation of energetic materials using quantum mechanical calculations. J Phys Chem A 110:1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0536192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tian L, Feiwu C (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33:580–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Politzer P, Jorge M, Jane SM, Monica CC, Alejandro T (2009) An electrostatic interaction correction for improved crystal density prediction. Mol Phys 107:2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970903156306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortimer JK, Mortimer JK (1968) Chemistry of detonations. IV. Evaluation of a simple predictional method for detonation velocities of C–H–N–O explosives. J Chem Phys 48:3685–3692. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1669671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Betsy MR, Samir S, Owens FJ (2002) Density functional calculations of bond dissociation energies for NO2 scission in some nitroaromatic molecules. J Mol Struct Theochem 583:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(01)00782-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xinghui J, Jianhua Z, Bingcheng H (2018) Exploration of high-energy-density materials: computational insight into energetic derivatives based on 1,2,4,5-tetrahydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazine. Chemistryopen 7:780–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/open.201800161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fangpei Z, Xinlu C, Zijiang L, Qihong L, Jun Z, Zhijiang W (2005) Calculations of bond dissociation energies and dipole moments in energetic materials using density-functional methods. Chinese J Phys 147:658–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stephen JB, Barney EG (2003) Bond dissociation energies of organic molecules. Acc Chem Res 36:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar020230d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich AV, Bloino J, Janesko BG, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian HP, Ortiz JV, Izmaylov AF, Sonnenberg JL, Williams-Young D, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski VG, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery JA Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark MJ, Heyd JJ, Brothers EN, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith TA, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell AP, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam JM, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Fox DJ (2016) Gaussian 16 Revision A.03. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT

  29. Badgujar DM, Talawar MB, Zarko VE, Mahulikar PP (2019) Recent advances in safe synthesis of energetic materials: an overview. Combust Explos Shock Waves 55:245–257. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010508219030018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haixiang G, Qinghua Z, Jean'ne MS (2020) Fused heterocycle-based energetic materials (2012–2019). J Mater Chem A 8:4193–4216. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA12704F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tao W, Weihua Z, Xiaowen Z, Yufang L, Heming X (2009) Molecular design of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine-based high-energy density materials. J Phys Chem A 113:9404–9412. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp902295v

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huynh MH, Hiskey MA, Pollard CJ, Montoya DP, Hartline EL, Gilardi R (2004) 4,4′,6,6′-Tetra-substituted hydrazo- and azo-1,3,5-triazines. J Energ Mater 22:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370650490893054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Politzer P, Murray JS (2011) Some perspectives on estimating detonation properties of C-H-N-O compounds. Cent Eur J Energ Mat 8(3):209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-015-2748-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian L, Chen F (2013) Bond order analysis based on the Laplacian of electron density in fuzzy overlap space. J Phys Chem A 117(14):3100–3108. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4010345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guixiang W, Xuedong G, Yan L, Hongchen D, Xiaojuan X, Heming X (2010) A theoretical investigation on the structures, densities, detonation properties, and pyrolysis mechanism of the nitro derivatives of phenols. Int J Quantum Chem 110(9):1691–1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cornelia CU, Marcel H, Burkhard K, Thomas MK (2020) Oxygen-rich bis(trinitroethyl esters): suitable oxidizers as potential ammonium perchlorate replacements. Energy Fuels 34:16469–16475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kamlet MJ, Adolph HG (1979) The relationship of impact sensitivity with structure of organic high explosives II. Polynitroaromatic explosives. Propell Explos 4(2):30–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.19790040204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kohno Y, Maekawa K, Tsuchioka T, Hashizume T (1994) A relationship between the impact sensitivity and the electronic structures for the unique N-N bond in the HMX polymorphs. Combust Flame 96(4):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)90103-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Murray Jane S, Lane P, Politzer P (1998) Effects of strongly electron-attracting components on molecular surface electrostatic potentials: applications to predicting impact sensitivities of energetic molecules. Mol Phys 93(2):187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/002689798169203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Anders G, Borges Jr I (2011) Topological analysis of the molecular charge density and impact sensitivity: models of energetic materials. J Phys Chem A 115(32):9055–9068. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204562d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shuji Y, Koshi M (2006) Theoretical studies of energy transfer rates of secondary explosives. J Phys Chem B 110(37):18515–18520. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp062815l

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Politzer P, Murray Jane S (2021) Are HOMO–LUMO gaps reliable indicators of explosive impact sensitivity? J Mol Model 27:327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04956-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhaobian X, Shuangqi H, Xiong C (2016) Theoretical insight into the influence of molecular ratio on the binding energy and mechanical property of HMX/2-picoline- N -oxide cocrystal, cooperativity effect and surface electrostatic potential. Mol Phys 114:2164–2176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2016.1190038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Betsy MR, Jennifer JH (2002) A quantum mechanical investigation of the relation between impact sensitivity and the charge distribution in energetic molecules. J Phys Chem A 106:1770–1783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Murray Jane S, Lane P, Politzer P (1995) Relationships between impact sensitivities and molecular surface electrostatic potentials of nitroaromatic and nitroheterocyclic molecules. Mol Phys 85:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979500100891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Politzer P, Murray JS (2015) High performance, low sensitivity: conflicting or compatible? Full Paper 41(3):414–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201500349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20220352). We are so grateful to the High-Performance Computing Center of Nanjing Tech University for doing the numerical calculations in this paper on its x-Flex enterprise blade cluster system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. Tingting Xiao is responsible for the design, calculated data collation, and wrote the original draft. Jun Chen and Jiani Xu tested the feasibility and is assigned to research support information. Peng Ma is responsible for the resources and project administration. Congming Ma is assigned to conceptualization and methodology.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Peng Ma or Congming Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

We allow the journal to review all the data, and we confirm the validity of theresults. There are no financial relationships. This work was not published previously, and it is not submitted to more than one journal. It is also not split up into several parts to submit. No data have been fabricated or manipulated.

Consent to participate

All the authors agree to participate in this investigation.

Consent for publication

All the authors agree to publish the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, T., Chen, J., Xu, J. et al. Theoretical insight into different energetic groups on the performance of energetic materials 2,5,7,9-tetranitro-2,5,7,9-tetraazabicyclo[4,3,0]nonane-8-one. J Mol Model 29, 231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-023-05628-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-023-05628-y

Keywords

Navigation