Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate by means of microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), the efficacy of four final irrigation protocols in the removal of hard-tissue debris (HTD) in mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus.

Materials and methods

Forty standardized mesial roots of extracted mandibular molars presenting isthmus were selected. The root canals were prepared and randomly divided into 4 groups (n = 10): EA, EndoActivator (Dentsply Sirona); EC, Easy Clean (Easy Dental Equipment, Belo Horizonte, Brazil); XPF, XP-Endo Finisher (FKG Dentaire, La Chaus-de Fonds, Switzerland); and PUI, passive ultrasonic irrigation using Irrisafe tip (Satelec Acteon, Merignac, France). Each final irrigation protocol was performed in two cycles (60 s), using, respectively, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Micro-CT scans were obtained pre-operatory, post-preparation, and post-irrigation. The percentage of HTD reduction was calculated. Data was analyzed statistically (ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis, significance set at 5%).

Results

The percentage of HTD reduction was greatest for the XPF group (77.92%), followed by EA (62.92%), PUI (47.48%), and EC (32.65%). Statistical differences (p < .05) were found between XPF and EC only. A significant difference (p < .05) was found between XPF and EC in all thirds and between PUI and EC in the middle third.

Conclusions

XPF, EA, and PUI were similarly effective in HTD reduction. However, none of the evaluated protocols was able to completely remove all the debris.

Clinical relevance

Final irrigation protocols aim to clean the canal complexities that are not addressed by the shaping procedures. Micro-CT allowed to assess the removal of hard-tissue debris in the isthmus and canals of mandibular molars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freire LG, Iglecias EF, Cunha RS, Dos Santos M, Gavini G (2015) Micro- computed tomographic evaluation of hard tissue debris removal after different irrigation methods and its influence on the filling of curved canals. J Endod 41:1660–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Paque F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M (2009) Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans. J Endod 35:1044–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tahmasbi M, Jalali P, Nair MK, Barghan S, Nair UP (2017) Prevalence of middle mesial canals and isthmi in the mesial root of mandibular molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod 43:1080–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters OA (2004) Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 30:559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Sluis LW, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) An evaluation of the influence of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the seal of root canal fillings. Int Endod J 40:356–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01227.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2007) Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 40:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez R, Neves AA, Belladonna FG, Silva E, Souza EM, Fidel S, Versiani MA, Lima I, Carvalho C, De-Deus G (2017) Impact of needle insertion depth on the removal of hard-tissue debris. Int Endod J 50:560–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duque JA, Duarte MA, Canali LC, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, Bramante CM (2017) Comparative effectiveness of new mechanical irrigant agitating devices for debris removal from the canal and isthmus of mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 43:326–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L (2013) Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, EndoVac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 39:1456–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE (2017) Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and file agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology 105:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kato AS, Cunha RS, da Silveira Bueno CE, Pelegrine RA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS (2016) Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 42:659–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uygun AD, Gundogdu EC, Arslan H, Ersoy I (2017) Efficacy of XP-endo finisher and TRUShape 3D conforming file compared to conventional and ultrasonic irrigation in removing calcium hydroxide. Aust Endod J 43:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulusoy OI, Savur IG, Alacam T, Celik B (2018) The effectiveness of various irrigation protocols on organic tissue removal from simulated internal resorption defects. Int Endod J. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bao P, Shen Y, Lin J, Haapasalo M (2017) In vitro efficacy of XP-endo finisher with 2 different protocols on biofilm removal from apical root canals. J Endod 43:321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keskin C, Sariyilmaz E, Sariyilmaz O (2017) Efficacy of XP-endo Finisher File in removing calcium hydroxide from simulated internal resorption cavity. J Endod 43:126–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Silva-Sousa YT, Bruniera JF, Pecora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2017) Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars. Int Endod J 50:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Azim AA, Aksel H, Zhuang T, Mashtare T, Babu JP, Huang GT (2016) Efficacy of 4 irrigation protocols in killing bacteria colonized in dentinal tubules examined by a novel confocal laser scanning microscope analysis. J Endod 42:928–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Alves FR, Andrade-Junior CV, Marceliano-Alves MF, Perez AR, Rocas IN, Versiani MA, Sousa-Neto MD, Provenzano JC, Siqueira JF Jr (2016) Adjunctive steps for disinfection of the mandibular molar root canal system: a correlative bacteriologic, micro-computed tomography, and cryopulverization approach. J Endod 42:1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Peix Sanchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N (2010) Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 36:1919–1931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andrade-Junior CV, Batista RM, Marceliano-Alves M, Alves F, Silva EJN (2016) Efficacy of a new activation device in irrigant penetration into simulated lateral canals. European Endodontic Journal 1:1–4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study. The authors extended thanks to Dr. Sérgio Aparecido Ignácio for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucila Piasecki.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Mattos de Araujo, B.M., Cruz, A.T.G., Piasecki, L. et al. Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus. Clin Oral Invest 26, 6121–6128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04561-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04561-3

Keywords

Navigation