Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular oral surgery in a university outpatient setting—a retrospective analysis of 1,559 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In general, trigeminal nerve injury is known as a potential risk of many surgical procedures in the oral cavity. Recent literature demonstrated that the risk of nerve injury is correlated with the experience of the surgeon. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the incidence of trigeminal nerve injuries in a teaching university setting.

Material and methods

From January 2000 to December 2009, a total of 1,559 patients underwent one intervention in the postcanine region of the mandible. Interventions included extractions, osteotomies, periradicular surgery, and implant surgery. In 2010, all 1,559 patient charts were screened. A record was made if trigeminal nerve injury was documented within the first month following surgery. These patients were re-evaluated.

Results

Documentation in the charts revealed that sensorial disturbance following surgery was seen in 42 patients (2.69 %). Among them, nine patients were clinically re-evaluated by the authors and 12 were interviewed by phone and observed by their dentist without any problems. Persistence of sensory disturbance was found in 5 of the 21 patients (0.32 %), and four of these five lesions were in the lingual nerve (0.25 %). Related to the type of surgery, most sensory disturbances were seen following periradicular surgery.

Discussion

Within the limitations of this study, it may be stated that oral surgery in an outpatient setting of a teaching university hospital resulted in very low rates of trigeminal nerve injuries. It may be concluded that adequately surveyed trainees can perform mandibular surgery without an increased risk of trigeminal sensorial disturbance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abarca M, van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, De Ridder J, Jacobs R (2006) Neurosensory disturbances after immediate loading of implants in the anterior mandible: an initial questionnaire approach followed by a psychophysical assessment. Clin Oral Investig 10:269–277

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, de e Silva OED, da Silva LC (2005) Lingual nerve damage after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jerjes W, Upile T, Nhembe F, Gudka D, Shah P, Abbas S, McCarthy E, Patel S, Mahil J, Hopper C (2010) Experience in third molar surgery: an update. Br Dent J 209:E1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khawaja N, Renton T (2009) Case studies on implant removal influencing the resolution of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br Dent J 206:365–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr (1980) Dysesthesia after mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 100:185–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Queral-Godoy E, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C (2006) Frequency and evolution of lingual nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:402–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schultze-Mosgau S, Reich RH (1993) Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C (2001) Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, Wong MC, Chan EK, Fok YH (2010) Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:320–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Susarla SM, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D (2003) Third molar surgery and associated complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 15:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baqain ZH, Abukaraky A, Hassoneh Y, Sawair F (2010) Lingual nerve morbidity and mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective study. Med Princ Pract 19:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gargallo-Albiol J, Buenechea-Imaz R, Gay-Escoda C (2000) Lingual nerve protection during surgical removal of lower third molars. A prospective randomised study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:268–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott NE, Chuang SK, Woo VV, Dodson TB (2003) Complications of dental implants: identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:848–855

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartling R, Freeman K, Kraut RA (1999) The incidence of altered sensation of the mental nerve after mandibular implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:1408–1412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mason DA (1988) Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:290–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr (1986) Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:855–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hegedus F, Diecidue RJ (2006) Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular implant placement—practical knowledge for clinicians. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:111–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gomes AC, Vasconcelos BC, Silva ED, Caldas Ade F Jr, Pita Neto IC (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:256–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malden NJ, Maidment YG (2002) Lingual nerve injury subsequent to wisdom teeth removal—a 5-year retrospective audit from a high street dental practice. Br Dent J 193:203–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Renton T, McGurk M (2001) Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:423–428. doi:10.1054/bjom.2001.0682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McGeachie JK (2002) Anatomy of the lingual nerve in relation to possible damage during clinical procedures. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 16:109–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, Nhembe F, Gudka D, Kafas P, McCarthy E, Abbas S, Patel S, Hamdoon Z, Abiola J, Vourvachis M, Kalkani M, Al-Khawalde M, Leeson R, Banu B, Rob J, El-Maaytah M, Hopper C (2010) Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery—revisited. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:335–345. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hillerup S (2008) Iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve: etiology, signs and symptoms, and observations on recovery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:704–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pogrel MA, Thamby S (2000) Permanent nerve involvement resulting from inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Am Dent Assoc 131:901–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wesson CM, Gale TM (2003) Molar apicectomy with amalgam root-end filling: results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals. Br Dent J 195:707–714, discussion 698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Szalma J, Lempel E, Jeges S, Szabo G, Olasz L (2010) The prognostic value of panoramic radiography of inferior alveolar nerve damage after mandibular third molar removal: retrospective study of 400 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:294–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roeder F, Wachtlin D, Schulze R (2012) Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT. Clin Oral Investig 16:699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Renton T, Yilmaz Z (2012) Managing iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury: a case series and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Deppe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deppe, H., Mücke, T., Wagenpfeil, S. et al. Trigeminal nerve injuries after mandibular oral surgery in a university outpatient setting—a retrospective analysis of 1,559 cases. Clin Oral Invest 19, 149–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1222-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1222-5

Keywords

Navigation