Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The present study compares the diagnostic value of periodontal bone defect images using conventional two-dimensional single-tooth radiographs and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods

Classified periodontal bone defects were prepared on pig mandibles and presented radiographically. Fifteen dentists were instructed to make a diagnosis based on these x-rays, regarding the type and the extent of the bone defects. Subsequently, the results were evaluated and compared to the morphology of the surgically prepared defects as the gold standard.

Results

On average, the diagnosis of infrabony defects were 21 %, dehiscence 25 %, and fenestration 33 % more accurate using the three-dimensional projection than with the single-tooth radiograph. Furthermore, the CBCT allows grade II furcation to be captured more accurately.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that a considerably more precise analysis of periodontal defects is possible due to the third dimension. Particularly, in the oro-vestibular orientation, defects could be detected significantly more accurate.

Clinical relevance

CBCT images offer an advantageous alternative to the conventional single-tooth radiograph while taking the higher exposure of radiation into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Listgarten MA (1980) Periodontal probing: what does it mean? J Clin Periodontol 7:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tyndall D, Rathore S (2008) Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am 52:825–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN (2000) The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent 28:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mol A (2004) Imaging methods in periodontology. Periodontology 2000 2004(34):34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeffcoat MK, Wang IC, Reddy MS (1995) Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics. Periodontology 2000 7:54–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pihlstrom BL (2001) Periodontal risk assessment, diagnosis and treatment planning. Periodontology 2000 25:37–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Özmeric N, Kostioutchenko I, Hägler G, Frentzen M, Jervøe-Storm PM (2008) Cone-beam computed tomography in assessment of periodontal ligament space: in vitro study on artificial tooth model. Clin Oral Investig 12:233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jervøe-Storm PM, Hagner M, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zöller JE, Jepsen S, Frentzen M (2010) Comparison of cone-beam computerized tomography and intraoral radiographs for determination of the periodontal ligament in a variable phantom. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Nackaerts O; SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium, Willems G (2011) Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mol A, Balasundaram A (2008) In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:319–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noujeim M, Prihoda T, Langlais R, Nummikoski P (2009) Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38:156–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L (2005) Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol 76:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP (2006) Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 77:1261–1266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J (2007) Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J (2008) Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:252–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimard BA, Hoidal MJ, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV, Mealey BL (2009) Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 80:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walter C, Kaner D, Berndt DC, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU (2009) Three-dimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol 36:250–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walter C, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU (2010) Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. J Clin Periodontol 37:436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walter C, Weiger R, Dietrich T, Lang N, Zitzmann NU (2012) Does three-dimensional imaging offer a financial benefit for treating maxillary molars with furcation involvement? A pilot clinical case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Faria Vasconcelos K, Evangelista KM, Rodrigues CD, Estrela C, de Sousa TO, Silva MAG (2012) Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:64–69

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleiner J, Hanning C, Schulze D, Stricker A, Jacobs R (2012) Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT. Clin Oral Investig 17:389–396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Frentzen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braun, X., Ritter, L., Jervøe-Storm, PM. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions. Clin Oral Invest 18, 1229–1236 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0

Keywords

Navigation