Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The use of NaOCl in combination with CHX produces cytotoxic product

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The combination of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX) yields a “precipitate potentially toxic” (PPT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the tissue response to implanted polyethylene tubes filled with PPT-soaked fibrin sponge.

Methods

Forty rats received four polyethylene tubes each; each tube was filled with fibrin sponge soaked by 2.5 % NaOCl, 2.0 % CHX, PPT (2.5 % NaOCl plus 2.0 % CHX), or not soaked (control). The observation time points were 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days. At each time point, eight animals were killed, and the tubes and surrounding tissues were removed, fixed, and prepared for light microscopic analysis by performing glycol methacrylate embedding, serial cutting into 3-μm sections, and hematoxylin–eosin staining. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the reactions were performed. Results were statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05).

Results

All chemical solutions caused moderate reactions at 7 days. On day 30, PPT group was more cytotoxic than the control group and the CHX group (p < 0.05). On days 15 and 60, PPT group was more cytotoxic than the control group (p < 0.05). On day 90, there was no statistically significant difference between the different groups.

Conclusion

PPT is more cytotoxic than NaOCl and CHX alone, particularly in the short term.

Clinical significance

Protocols which suggest the use of CHX and NaOCl must be revised because this mixture produces cytotoxic product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rossi-Fedele G, Doğramaci EJ, Guastalli AR, Steier L, de Figueiredo JÁ (2012) Antagonistic interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endod 38:426–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP (1998) Antibacterial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 24:472–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32:389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Banchs F, Trope M (2004) Revascularization of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: new treatment protocol? J Endod 30:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reynolds K, Johnson JD, Cohenca N (2009) Pulp revascularization of necrotic bilateral bicuspids using a modified novel technique to eliminate potential coronal discolouration: a case report. Int Endod J 42:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shin SY, Albert JS, Mortman RE (2009) One step pulp revascularization treatment of an immature permanent tooth with chronic apical abscess: a case report. Int Endod J 42:1118–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrino JA, Boda KK, Shambarger S, Bowles WR, McClanahan SB (2010) Challenges in regenerative endodontics: a case series. J Endod 36:536–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN, Fillery E, Manzur A (2007) Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod 33:966–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Basrani BR, Manek S, Fillery E (2009) Using diazotization to characterize the effect of heat or sodium hypochlorite on 2.0% chlorhexidine. J Endod 35:1296–1299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, Fillery E, Sodhi RN (2010) Determination of 4-chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. J Endod 36:312–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S (2010) Evaluation and prevention of the precipitate formed on interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 36:1154–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giertsen E (2004) Effects of mouthrinses with triclosan, zinc ions, copolymer, and sodium lauryl sulphate combined with fluoride on acid formation by dental plaque in vivo. Caries Res 38:430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gasic J, Popovic J, Zivković S, Petrovic A, Barac R, Nikolic M (2012) Ultrastructural analysis of the root canal walls after simultaneous irrigation of different sodium hypochlorite concentration and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate. Microsc Res Tech 75:1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akisue E, Tomita VS, Gavini G, Poli de Figueiredo JÁ (2010) Effect of the combination of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on dentinal permeability and scanning electron microscopy precipitate observation. J Endod 36:847–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC (2008) Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 34:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mortenson D, Sadilek M, Flake NM, Paranjpe A, Heling I, Johnson JD, Cohenca N (2012) The effect of using an alternative irrigant between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine to prevent the formation of para-chloroaniline within the root canal system. Int Endod J 45:878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes-Filho JE, Silva FO, Watanabe S, Cintra LT, Tendoro KV, Dalto LG, Pacanaro SV, Lodi CS, de Melo FF (2010) Tissue reaction to silver nanoparticles dispersion as an alternative irrigating solution. J Endod 36:1698–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American National Standards Institute/Revised American National Standards Institute American Dental Association (1979) document no. 41: for recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. American National Standards Institute, New York

  19. Federation Dentaire International recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials (1980) Federation Dentaire International Commission on Dental Materials, Equipment, and Theropeutics: part 4.11—subcutaneous implantation test. Int Dental J 30:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gomes Filho JE, Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA, Novaes PD, Souza Filho FJ (2001) Glycol methacrylate: an alternative method for embedding subcutaneous implants. J Endod 27:266–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cintra LT, Ribeiro TA, Gomes-Filho JE, Bernabé PF, Watanabe S, Facundo AC, Samuel RO, Dezan-Junior E (2013) Biocompatibility and biomineralization assessment of a new root canal sealer and root-end filling material. Dent Traumatol 29:145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hand RE, Smith ML, Harrison JW (1978) Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 4:60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifacio KC, Ito IY (1999) In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod 25:167–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeansonne MJ, White RR (1994) A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 20:276–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cervone F, Tronstad L, Hammond B (1990) Antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine in a controlled release delivery system. Endod Dent Traumatol 6:33–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siqueira JF, Batista MM, Fraga RC, de Uzeda M (1998) Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 24:414–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR (1997) Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod 23:229–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, Gul K (2004) Antibacterial Activity of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate and 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite in Infected Root Canal: In Vivo Study. J Endod 30:30–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marchesan MA, Pasternak Junior B, Afonso MM, Sousa-Neto MD, Paschoalato C (2007) Chemical analysis of the flocculate formed by the association of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chhabra RS, Huff JE, Haseman JK, Elwell MR, Peters AC (1991) Carcinogenicity of p-chloroaniline in rats and mice. Food Chem Toxicol 29:119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bodrumlu E, Muglali M, Sumer M, Guvenc T (2008) The response of subcutaneous connective tissue to a new endodontic filling material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 84:463–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olsson B, Sliwkowsky A, Langeland K (1981) Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endod 7:355–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spangberg L, Pascon EA (1988) The importance of material preparation for the expression of cytotoxicity during in vitro evaluation of biomaterials. J Endod 14:247–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH (1985) Cytotoxic effects of sodium hypochlorite on vital tissue. J Endod 11:525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cintra, L.T.A., Watanabe, S., Samuel, R.O. et al. The use of NaOCl in combination with CHX produces cytotoxic product. Clin Oral Invest 18, 935–940 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1049-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1049-5

Keywords

Navigation