Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fiber posts inside the root canal?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim was to investigate the effects of chlorhexidine and ethanol pretreatment of the root canal on push-out bond strengths and durability of adhesion of fiber posts luted with two different adhesive strategies.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty human anterior teeth were endodontically treated. After post space preparation, the root canals were irrigated using 1 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) applied with passive ultrasonic irrigation followed by distilled water (control). In pretreatment (PT) group, chlorhexidine (CHX) root canals were irrigated using 2 % chlorhexidine; and in the PT group, 99 % ethanol was used prior application of the luting agent. Two different post-and-luting systems with an etch-and-rinse (CX) adhesive approach (n = 60) and a self-adhesive resin cement (RX; n = 60) were inserted into the root canals. Bond strengths were evaluated initially and after thermocycling and storage for 6 months using push-out tests.

Results

Bond strength was significantly affected by the adhesive strategy (p < 0.0005), the pretreatment (p < 0.0005) and the location inside the root canal (p < 0.0005; repeated measurement ANOVA). Ethanol significantly increased bond strengths irrespective of the luting agent used compared to the control and CHX group (p < 0.05; Tukey's B).

Conclusion

Ethanol significantly increased bond strength of the CX and the RX system inside the root canal and could be recommended as a final rinse for luting fiber posts using an ethanol-based etch-and-rinse adhesive system or self-adhesive resin cement.

Clinical relevance

PT of the root canal using ethanol seems to facilitate adhesive luting of fiber posts with the tested adhesive system and luting cements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bitter K, Noetzel J, Stamm O, Vaudt J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2009) Randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of post placement on failure rate of postendodontic restorations: preliminary results of a mean period of 32 months. J Endod 35(11):1477–1482. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M (2008) Clinical studies of fiber posts: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 21(4):328–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sterzenbach G, Franke A, Naumann M (2012) Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts-clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss. J Endod 38(12):1557–1563. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, Cagidiaco MC, Tay FR, Breschi L, Polimeni A, Goracci C (2012) A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res 91(7 Suppl):72S–78S. doi:10.1177/0022034512447949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naumann M, Koelpin M, Beuer F, Meyer-Lueckel H (2012) 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study. J Endod 38(4):432–435. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS (2010) A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont 19(8):639–646. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00647.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH (2005) Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 31(8):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mjör IA, Smith MR, Ferrari M, Mannocci F (2001) The structure of dentine in the apical region of human teeth. Int Endod J 34(5):346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bitter K, Perdigao J, Exner M, Neumann K, Kielbassa A, Sterzenbach G (2012) Reliability of fiber post bonding to root canal dentin after simulated clinical function in vitro. Oper Dent 37(4):397–405. doi:10.2341/11-066-L

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bitter K, Perdigao J, Hartwig C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2011) Nanoleakage of luting agents for bonding fiber posts after thermomechanical fatigue. J Adhes Dent 13(1):61–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2011) Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res 90(8):953–968. doi:10.1177/0022034510391799

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, Carrilho MR (2006) Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater 22(10):973–980. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim YK, Gu LS, Bryan TE, Kim JR, Chen L, Liu Y, Yoon JC, Breschi L, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2010) Mineralisation of reconstituted collagen using polyvinylphosphonic acid/polyacrylic acid templating matrix protein analogues in the presence of calcium, phosphate and hydroxyl ions. Biomaterials 31(25):6618–6627. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.060

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Munck J, Van den Steen PE, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, Van Meerbeek B (2009) Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of adhesive–dentin interfaces. J Dent Res 88(12):1101–1106. doi:10.1177/0022034509346952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang SC, Kern M (2009) The role of host-derived dentinal matrix metalloproteinases in reducing dentin bonding of resin adhesives. Int J Oral Sci 1(4):163–176. doi:10.4248/IJOS.09044

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, Ito S (2004) Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res 83(3):216–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, de Souza Costa CA, Pashley DH, Hebling J (2010) Chlorhexidine increases the longevity of in vivo resin–dentin bonds. Eur J Oral Sci 118(4):411–416. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00754.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cecchin D, de Almeida JF, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC (2011) Influence of chlorhexidine and ethanol on the bond strength and durability of the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin using a total etching adhesive system. J Endod 37(9):1310–1315. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindblad RM, Lassila LV, Salo V, Vallittu PK, Tjaderhane L (2010) Effect of chlorhexidine on initial adhesion of fiber-reinforced post to root canal. J Dent 38(10):796–801. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindblad RM, Lassila LV, Salo V, Vallittu PK, Tjaderhane L (2012) One year effect of chlorhexidine on bonding of fibre-reinforced composite root canal post to dentine. J Dent 40(9):718–722. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32(5):389–398. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sauro S, Watson TF, Mannocci F, Miyake K, Huffman BP, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2009) Two-photon laser confocal microscopy of micropermeability of resin–dentin bonds made with water or ethanol wet bonding. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90(1):327–337. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31290

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carvalho CA, Cantoro A, Mazzoni A, Goracci C, Breschi L, Ferrari M (2009) Effect of ethanol application on post-luting to intraradicular dentine. Int Endod J 42(2):129–135. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01491.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2006) Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 39(10):809–818. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2009) Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 117:326–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sterzenbach G, Karajouli G, Naumann M, Peroz I, Bitter K (2012) Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements—an evaluation of different adhesive approaches. Acta Odontol Scand 70(5):368–376. doi:10.3109/00016357.2011.603702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soares CJ, Santana FR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PC, Soares PV, Qian F, Armstrong SR (2008) Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests. Dent Mater 24(10):1405–1411. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M (2008) Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 116(6):557–563. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00577.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazzoni A, Marchesi G, Cadenaro M, Mazzotti G, Di Lenarda R, Ferrari M, Breschi L (2009) Push-out stress for fibre posts luted using different adhesive strategies. Eur J Oral Sci 117(4):447–453. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00656.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M (2007) Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 35(11):827–835. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Prati C, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2005) In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 84(3):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Ferrari M, Osorio R (2012) Effect of thermal cycling on the bond strength of self-adhesive cements to fiber posts. Clin Oral Investig 16(3):909–915. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0576-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kallio TT, Lastumaki TM, Vallittu PK (2001) Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent Mater 17(1):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zicari F, De Munck J, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B (2012) Factors affecting the cement–post interface. Dent Mater 28(3):287–297. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B (2008) Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber–post bonding. Dent Mater 24(7):967–977. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bitter K, Hambarayan A, Neumann K, Blunck U, Sterzenbach G (2013) Various irrigation protocols for final rinse after post space preparation to improve bond strengths of fiber posts inside the root canal. Eur J Oral Sci. doi:10.1111/eos.12057

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2009) Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 35(6):791–804. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2005) The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper. Int Endod J 38(10):764–768. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01018.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Toledano M, Perdigao J, Osorio E, Osorio R (2002) Influence of NaOCl deproteinization on shear bond strength in function of dentin depth. Am J Dent 15(4):252–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shafiei F, Memarpour M (2010) Effect of chlorhexidine application on long-term shear bond strength of resin cements to dentin. J Prosthodont Res 54(4):153–158. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2010.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnamurthy S, Sudhakaran S (2010) Evaluation and prevention of the precipitate formed on interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. J Endod 36(7):1154–1157. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Sterzenbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitter, K., Aschendorff, L., Neumann, K. et al. Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fiber posts inside the root canal?. Clin Oral Invest 18, 927–934 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1040-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1040-1

Keywords

Navigation