Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-generated four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses made with digital and conventional impressions.
Materials and method
A titanium master model was used. For group conventional impression (CI), 12 polyether impressions of the master model with ImpregumTM were made. For group digital impression (DI), 12 digital impressions of the master model using LavaTM C.O.S. system were made. The replica technique was applied. The Mann–Whitney U statistical test was applied to detect statistical differences between the groups, in terms of marginal and internal fit. Face-by-face comparisons between groups were also carried out.
Results
Groups DI and CI presented mean marginal fit of 63.96 and 65.33 μm, respectively, and showed no statistically significant difference. Groups DI and CI presented significantly different internal fit with mean values of 58.46 and 65.94 μm, respectively. Group DI showed statistically significantly lower values for marginal and internal fit on premolar mesial face, and on molar distal and palatal faces.
Conclusions
Frameworks fabricated from digital and conventional impressions showed clinically acceptable marginal fit. Frameworks fabricated from digital impression demonstrated better internal fit than ones fabricated from conventional impression. Reviewing each retainer face, digital impression showed better marginal and internal fit at the premolar mesial and molar distal faces.
Clinical relevance
The results of this in vitro study show that digital impressions made with the LavaTM C.O.S. system and its digital workflow are suitable for fabricating four-unit zirconia frameworks, with regard to marginal and internal fit requirements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139(6):761–763
Cancy JM, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL (1983) Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil 10(4):325–333
Endo T, Finger WJ (2006) Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int 37(1):47–51
Shetty P, Rodrigues S (2006) Accuracy of elastomeric impression materials on repeated pours. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 6(2):68–71
Hondrum SO (2001) Changes in properties of non-aqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. J Prosthet Dent 85(1):73–81
Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ (2002) Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 11(2):98–108
State of the industry (2000) Lab Management Today; 2000; 9–15
Christensen GJ (2005) The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions. Room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136:343–346
Christensen GJ (2007) Laboratories want better impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 138(4):527–529
Christensen GJ (2008) The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 139(3):347–349
Touchstone A, Nieting T, Ulmer N (2010) Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 141(6 suppl):15S–19S
Mehl A, Hickel R (1999) Current state of development and perspectives of machine based production methods for dental restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2(1):9–35
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204(9):505–511
Al-Bakri IA, Hussey D, Al-Omari WM (2007) The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent 18(2):29–33
Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W (2009) Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Invest 13:343–349
Jablonski S (1993) Illustrated dictionary of dentistry, 1982. J Dent 21:265–273
Fransson B, Oilo G, Gjeitanger R (1985) The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1:197–199
Karlsson S (1993) The fit of Procera titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:129–134
McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111
Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA (1985) Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 53:24–29
Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT (1997) A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10:478–484
Beschinidt SM, Strub JR (1999) Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehab 26:582–593
Janenko C, Smales RJ (1979) Anterior crowns and gingival health. Australi Dent J 24:225–230
Bader JD, Rozier RG, McFall WT Jr, Ramsey DL (1991) Effect of crowns margins on periodontal conditions in regularly attending patients. J Prosthet Dent 65:75–79
Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult Von Steyern O, Fukushima S (2005) Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera All-Ceram crowns. J Oral Rehab 32:526–530
Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179
Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schimitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579–584
Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M (2009) Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 117:319–325
Rekow D, Thompson VP (2005) Near-surface damage—a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng 219:233–243
Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S (2009) 3M ESPE Technical Datasheet. http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId=66666UuZjcFSLXTtnXMVMXfXEVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666. Accessed 10 May 2011
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559
Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Myasaki T, Fujiwara T (2007) Effect of shrinkage on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 26(6):820–826
Mehl A, Ender A, Mörman W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12(1):11–28
Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions—an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14(1):11–21
Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2007) Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 35(12):903–908
Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera all-ceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–124
Molin M, Karlsson S (1993) The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:201–206
Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408
Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR (1995) The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J 40:17–21
Rekow ED, Harsono M, Janal M, Thompsin VP, Zhang G (2006) Factorial analysis of variables influencing stress in all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 22:125–132
Abduo J, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review. J Oral Rehab 47:866–876
Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, Monaco C (2011) Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.005
Suttor D, Bunke K, Hoescheller S, Hauptmann H, Hertlein G (2001) LAVA—the system for all-ceramic ZrO2 crown and bridge frameworks. Int Comput Dent 4:195–206
Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H (2011) Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings. Dent Mater 27(12):1273–1278
Acknowledgments
The first author was supported by the Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (grant no. BEX 2354101). The authors thank Mrs. Vindi Jurinovic (IBE, LMU Munich) for statistical support.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Almeida e Silva, J.S., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D. et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest 18, 515–523 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2