Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gene array of primary human osteoblasts exposed to enamel matrix derivative in combination with a natural bone mineral

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The application of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) for regenerative periodontal surgery has been shown to promote formation of new cementum, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone. In intrabony defects with a complicated anatomy, the combination of EMD with various bone grafting materials has resulted in additional clinical improvements, but the initial cellular response of osteoblasts coming in contact with these particles have not yet been fully elucidated. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of EMD combined with a natural bone mineral (NBM) on a wide variety of genes, cytokines, and transcription factors and extracellular matrix proteins on primary human osteoblasts.

Material and methods

Primary human osteoblasts were seeded on NBM particles pre-coated with versus without EMD and analyzed for gene differences using a human osteogenesis gene super-array (Applied Biosystems). Osteoblast-related genes include those transcribed during bone mineralization, ossification, bone metabolism, cell growth and differentiation, as well as gene products representing extracellular matrix molecules, transcription factors, and cell adhesion molecules.

Results

EMD promoted gene expression of various osteoblast differentiation markers including a number of collagen types and isoforms, SMAD intracellular proteins, osteopontin, cadherin, alkaline phosphatase, and bone sialoprotein. EMD also upregulated a variety of growth factors including bone morphogenetic proteins, vascular endothelial growth factors, insulin-like growth factor, transforming growth factor, and their associated receptor proteins.

Conclusion

The results from the present study demonstrate that EMD is capable of activating a wide variety of genes, growth factors, and cytokines when pre-coated onto NBM particles.

Clinical relevance

The described in vitro effects of EMD on human primary osteoblasts provide further biologic support for the clinical application of a combination of EMD with NBM particles in periodontal and oral regenerative surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sculean A, Alessandri R, Miron RJ, Salvi G, Bosshard DD (2011) Enamel matrix proteins and periodontal wound healing and regeneration. Clin Adv Periodontics 1:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gkranias ND, Graziani F, Sculean A, Donos N (2012) Wound healing following regenerative procedures in furcation degree III defects: histomorphometric outcomes. Clin Oral Investig 16:239–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pietruska M, Pietruski J, Nagy K, Brecx M, Arweiler NB, Sculean A (2011) Four-year results following treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix derivative alone or combined with a biphasic calcium phosphate. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0611-2

  4. Lyngstadaas SP, Wohlfahrt JC, Brookes SJ, Paine ML, Snead ML, Reseland JE (2009) Enamel matrix proteins; old molecules for new applications. Orthod Craniofac Res 12:243–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Margolis HC, Beniash E, Fowler CE (2006) Role of macromolecular assembly of enamel matrix proteins in enamel formation. J Dent Res 85:775–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartlett JD, Ganss B, Goldberg M, Moradian-Oldak J, Paine ML, Snead ML, Wen X, White SN, Zhou YL (2006) Protein–protein interactions of the developing enamel matrix. Curr Top Dev Biol 74:57–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammarström L (1997) Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 24:658–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Polimeni G, Koo KT, Qahash M, Xiropaidis AV, Albandar JM, Wikesjo UM (2004) Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of a space-providing biomaterial on guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 31:725–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siciliano VI, Andreuccetti G, Siciliano AI, Blasi A, Sculean A, Salvi GE (2011) Clinical outcomes after treatment of non-contained intrabony defects with enamel matrix derivative or guided tissue regeneration: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 82:62–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sculean A, Windisch P, Keglevich T, Chiantella GC, Gera I, Donos N (2003) Clinical and histologic evaluation of human intrabony defects treated with an enamel matrix protein derivative combined with a bovine-derived xenograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 23:47–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto S, Masuda H, Shibukawa Y, Yamada S (2007) Combination of bovine-derived xenografts and enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in dogs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 27:471–479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Weinlaender M, Nedic M, Aleksic Z, Kenney EB (2000) A comparison between enamel matrix proteins used alone or in combination with bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodontol 71:1110–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Velasquez-Plata D, Scheyer ET, Mellonig JT (2002) Clinical comparison of an enamel matrix derivative used alone or in combination with a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Periodontol 73:433–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zucchelli G, Amore C, Montebugnoli L, De Sanctis M (2003) Enamel matrix proteins and bovine porous bone mineral in the treatment of intrabony defects: a comparative controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 74:1725–1735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mrozik KM, Gronthos S, Menicanin D, Marino V, Bartold PM (2011) Effect of coating Straumann® Bone Ceramic with Emdogain on mesenchymal stromal cell hard tissue formation. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0558-3

  16. Chambrone D, Pasin IM, Chambrone L, Pannuti CM, Conde MC, Lima LA (2010) Treatment of infrabony defects with or without enamel matrix proteins: a 24-month follow-up randomized pilot study. Quintessence Int 41:125–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miron RJ, Bosshardt D, Hedbom E, Zhang Y, Haenni B, Buser D, Sculean A (2012) Adsorption of Enamel Matrix Proteins to a Bovine Derived Bone Grafting Material and its Regulation of Cell Adhesion, Proliferation and Differentiation. J Periodontol. doi:10.1902/jop.2011.110480

  18. Grandin HM, Gemperli AC, Dard M (2012) Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Review of Cellular Effects In Vitro and a Model of Molecular Arrangement and Functioning. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. doi:10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0365

  19. Bennett JH, Carter DH, Alavi AL, Beresford JN, Walsh S (2001) Patterns of integrin expression in a human mandibular explant model of osteoblast differentiation. Arch Oral Biol 46:229–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miron RJ, Hedbom E, Ruggiero S, Bosshardt DD, Zhang Y, Mauth C, Gemperli AC, Iizuka T, Buser D, Sculean A (2011) Premature osteoblast clustering by enamel matrix proteins induces osteoblast differentiation through up-regulation of connexin 43 and N-cadherin. PLoS One 6:e23375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miron RJ, Oates CJ, Molenberg A, Dard M, Hamilton DW (2010) The effect of enamel matrix proteins on the spreading, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 31:449–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosshardt DD (2008) Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels. J Clin Periodontol 35:87–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carinci F, Piattelli A, Guida L, Perrotti V, Laino G, Oliva A, Annunziata M, Palmieri A, Pezzetti F (2006) Effects of Emdogain on osteoblast gene expression. Oral Dis 12:329–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapferer I, Schmidt S, Gstir R, Durstberger G, Huber LA, Vietor I (2011) Gene-expression profiles of epithelial cells treated with EMD in vitro: analysis using complementary DNA arrays. J Periodontal Res 46:118–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heldin CH, Miyazono K, ten Dijke P (1997) TGF-beta signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature 390:465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawase T, Okuda K, Momose M, Kato Y, Yoshie H, Burns DM (2001) Enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) rapidly stimulates phosphorylation of the MAP kinase family and nuclear accumulation of smad2 in both oral epithelial and fibroblastic human cells. J Periodontal Res 36:367–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawase T, Okuda K, Yoshie H, Burns DM (2002) Anti-TGF-beta antibody blocks enamel matrix derivative-induced upregulation of p21WAF1/cip1 and prevents its inhibition of human oral epithelial cell proliferation. J Periodontal Res 37:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suzuki N, Ohyama M, Maeno M, Ito K, Otsuka K (2001) Attachment of human periodontal ligament cells to enamel matrix-derived protein is mediated via interaction between BSP-like molecules and integrin alpha(v)beta3. J Periodontol 72:1520–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lyngstadaas SP, Lundberg E, Ekdahl H, Andersson C, Gestrelius S (2001) Autocrine growth factors in human periodontal ligament cells cultured on enamel matrix derivative. J Clin Periodontol 28:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kémoun P, Gronthos S, Snead ML, Rue J, Courtois B, Vaysse F, Salles JP, Brunel G (2011) The role of cell surface markers and enamel matrix derivatives on human periodontal ligament mesenchymal progenitor responses in vitro. Biomaterials 32:7375–7388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nokhbehsaim M, Deschner B, Winter J, Bourauel C, Rath B, Jäger A, Jepsen S, Deschner J (2011) Interactions of regenerative, inflammatory and biomechanical signals on bone morphogenetic protein-2 in periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontal Res 46:374–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parkar MH, Tonetti M (2004) Gene expression profiles of periodontal ligament cells treated with enamel matrix proteins in vitro: analysis using cDNA arrays. J Periodontol 75:1539–1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

This work was funded by the Department of Periodontology at the University of Bern, Geistlich Pharma AG (Wolhusen, Switzerland) and Institut Straumann AG (Basel, Switzerland). No other conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Sculean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miron, R.J., Bosshardt, D.D., Zhang, Y. et al. Gene array of primary human osteoblasts exposed to enamel matrix derivative in combination with a natural bone mineral. Clin Oral Invest 17, 405–410 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0742-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0742-0

Keywords

Navigation