Skip to main content
Log in

Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Which imaging technique should be preferred in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw? A prospective clinical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was the aim of the present study to find out which radiological imaging techniques allow assessing the extent of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (BONJ) in an adequate way. Twenty-four patients suffering from BONJ were included in the study. Before surgery, each patient was examined with panoramic radiograph, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and non-enhanced computed tomography. The detectability of BONJ was assessed for the three imaging techniques. The extent of the jaw region affected by BONJ was determined in MRI and CT scans and compared to the intra-operative situation. The detectability of BONJ lesions was 54% for panoramic radiographs, 92% for MRI scans and 96% for computed tomography (CT) scans. The intra-operatively assessed extent of BONJ correlated significantly with the measurements on CT scans (p = 0.0004) but did not correlate significantly with the measurements in MRI scans (p = 0.241). The intra-operatively measured extent of BONJ differed significantly from the CT measurements (p = 0.00003) but not from the MRI data (p = 0.137). Although MRI as well as CT have a high detectability for BONJ lesions that exceeds that of panoramic radiographs by far, both techniques show problems with the exact assessment of the extent of BONJ lesions in the individual patients. Therefore, the relevance of MRI and CT for the preoperative assessment of the extent of BONJ lesions is limited. Future research should focus on the identification of imaging techniques that allow assessing the extent of BONJ lesions with a higher accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AAOMS (2007) American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Id MH, Warnke PH, Gottschalk J, Springer I, Wiltfang J, Acil Y, Russo PA, Kreusch T (2008) “Bis-phossy jaws”—high and low risk factors for bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 36:95–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedogni A, Blandamura S, Lokmic Z, Palumbo C, Ragazzo M, Ferrari F, Tregnaghi A, Pietrogrande F, Procopio O, Saia G, Ferretti M, Bedogni G, Chiarini L, Ferronato G, Ninfo V, Lo Russo L, Lo Muzio L, Nocini PF (2008) Bisphosphonate-associated jawbone osteonecrosis: a correlation between imaging techniques and histopathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endo 105:358–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchi SD, Scoletta M, Cassione FB, Migliaretti G, Mozzati M (2007) Computerized tomographic findings in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with cancer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:249–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisdas S, Chambron Pinho N, Smolarz A, Sader R, Vogl TJ, Mack MG (2008) Biphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaws: CT and MRI spectrum of findings in 32 patients. Clin Radiol 63:71–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiandussi S, Biasotto M, Dore F, Cavalli F, Cova MA, Di Lenarda R (2006) Clinical and diagnostic imaging of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:236–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grotz KA, Walter C, Kuttner C, Al-Nawas B (2007) Relevance of bisphosphonate long-term therapy in radiation therapy of endosteal jaw metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 183:190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hugentobler M, Richter M (2006) A proposed algorithm for medicodental care of patients treated with bisphosphonates. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 107:441–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marx RE (2003) Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:1115–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phal PM, Myall RW, Assael LA, Weissman JL (2007) Imaging findings of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1139–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruggiero SL, Mehrotra B, Rosenberg TJ, Engroff SL (2004) Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates: a review of 63 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkinson GS, Kuo YF, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS (2007) Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy and inflammatory conditions or surgery of the jaw: a population-based analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woo SB, Hellstein JW, Kalmar JR (2006) Narrative [corrected] review: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws. Ann Intern Med 144:753–761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wutzl A, Biedermann E, Wanschitz F, Seemann R, Klug C, Baumann A, Watzinger F, Schicho K, Ewers R, Millesi G (2008) Treatment results of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Head Neck 30:1224–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr. Matthias Fenner, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Erlangen, for his help with the statistical analyses.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Stockmann.

Additional information

P. Stockmann and F. M. Hinkmann contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stockmann, P., Hinkmann, F.M., Lell, M.M. et al. Panoramic radiograph, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Which imaging technique should be preferred in bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw? A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Invest 14, 311–317 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0293-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0293-1

Keywords

Navigation