Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dealing with hierarchical data in periodontal research

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Site-specific clinical periodontal data are usually plentiful, typically hierarchical, and generally valuable information. Summarizing these data on a subject level for easy application of standard statistical tests leads to loss of most of the information. In addition, well-known fallacies may make interpretation difficult if not impossible. In this study, an attempt is made to apply, in a non-technical way and as a tutorial, a rather complex multilevel model of gingival thickness, which provides unbiased estimates of fixed effects and a variance/covariance matrix with considerable information as regards data structure. When applying multilevel modeling, random effects should generally be reported in a proper way, since they might reveal new insights into subject and tooth variation, correlations between covariates, and even problems with the chosen model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albandar J, Goldstein H (1992) Multi-level statistical models in studies of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 63:690–695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Axtelius B, Söderfeldt B, Attström R (1999) A multilevel analysis of factors affecting pocket probing depth in patients responding differently to periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 26:67–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Leeuw J, Kreft I (2001) Software for multilevel analysis. In: Leyland AH, Goldstein H (eds) Multilevel modeling of health statistics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 187–204

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (2002) Analysis of longitudinal data, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A (1996) Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. J Clin Periodontol 23:839–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilthorpe MS, Griffiths GS, Maddick IH, Zamzuri AT (2000) The application of multilevel modelling to periodontal research data. Community Dent Health 17:227–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilthorpe MS, Griffiths GS, Maddick IH, Zamzuri AT (2001) An application of multilevel modelling to longitudinal periodontal research data. Community Dent Health 18:79–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilthorpe MS, Zamzuri AT, Griffiths GS, Maddick IH, Eaton KA, Johnson NW (2003) Unification of the “burst” and “linear” theories of periodontal disease progression: a multilevel manifestation of the same phenomenon. J Dent Res 82:200–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J (2002) Multilevel modeling of medical data. Stat Med 21:3291–3315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraemer HC, Blasey CM (2004) Centring in regression analyses: a strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 13:141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leyland AH, Goldstein H (2001) Multilevel modeling of health statistics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller HP, Eger T (1997) Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 24:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Müller HP, Könönen E (2005) Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodont Res 40:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller HP, Stadermann S (2006) Multivariate multilevel models for repeated measures in the study of smoking effects on the association between plaque and gingival bleeding. Clin Oral Investig 10:311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T (2000) Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 27:621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A (2000) Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 27:431–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Könönen E, Yang M (2006) Effect of triclosan/copolymer-containing toothpaste on the association between plaque and gingival bleeding: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 33:811–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Könönen E (2007) Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Clin Oral Investig 11:439–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schroeder HE (1986) The periodontium. Springer, Berlin, pp 238–247

    Google Scholar 

  20. Snijders TAB (2001) Sampling. In: Leyland AH, Goldstein H (eds) Multilevel modeling of health statistics. Wiley, London, pp 159–174

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterne JA, Johnson NW, Wilton JM, Joyston-Bechal S, Smales FC (1988) Variance components analysis of data from periodontal research. J Periodont Res 23:148–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by Kuwait University Research Administration, Grant # DS02/02.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Peter Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, HP. Dealing with hierarchical data in periodontal research. Clin Oral Invest 13, 273–278 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0237-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0237-1

Keywords

Navigation