Skip to main content
Log in

Potentials of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures*

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application and limitation of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures. Eighty-one patients with radiologically proved fractures of the facial skeleton were included in this study. Examinations were performed using a 7.5-MHz small-part applicator. Another ten patients without facial fractures served as controls with normal sonoanatomical findings. The most important deficiency of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures is the difficult detection of non-dislocated fractures. According to our own experiences, the application of ultrasound in midfacial fractures is most useful for visualization of the zygomatic arch and the anterior wall of the frontal sinus, with immediate imaging after closed reduction avoiding radiation exposure. Moreover, it is restricted to fractures of the orbital margin and nasal bone. If ultrasound is performed as the first imaging modality in cases of suspected facial fractures by an experienced investigator, the visualization of fracture lines can avoid conventional imaging, so that only an indicated CT scan can be added. In doubtful cases, an individual combination of conventional radiographs would be the next step. By this, an overall reduction of radiation exposure seems possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akizuki H, Yoshida H, Michi K (1990) Ultrasonographic evaluation during reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 18:263–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleier R, Rochels R (1986) Echographische Diagnostik bei Nasennebenhöhlenverletzungen. Laryngo Rhino Otol 65:423–426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Viesscher JGAM, van der Waal KGH (1988) Medial orbital wall with enophthalmos. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 16:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forrest CR, Lata AC, Marcuzzi DW, Bailey MH (1993) The role of orbital ultrasound in the diagnosis of orbital fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:28–34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrich RE, Volkenstein RJ (1991) Wertigkeit der Sonographie für die Diagnose von Jochbogenfrakturen. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 15:472–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedrich RE, Plambeck K, Bartel-Friedrich S, Giese M, Schmelzle R (2001) Limitations of B-scan ultrasound for diagnosing fractures of the mandibular condyle and ramus. Clin Oral Invest 5:11–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Geyer G, Rochels R (1984) Endoskopische und sonographische Diagnostik bei Orbitabodenfrakturen. Fortschr Ophthalmol 81:119–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guthoff R (1988) Ultraschall in der ophthalmologischen Diagnostik. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart

  9. Hammerschlag SB, Hughes S, O’Reilly GV, Naheedy MH, Rumbaugh CL (1982) Blow-out fractures of the orbit: a comparison of computed tomography and conventional radiography with anatomical correlation. Radiology 143:487–492

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassfeld S, Streib S, Sahl H, Stratmann U, Fehrentz D, Zöller J (1998) Low-dose-Computertomographie des Kieferknochens in der präimplantologischen Diagnostik. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 2:188–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heiland M, Schulze D, Adam G, Schmelzle R (2003) 3D-imaging of the facial skeleton with an isocentric mobile C-arm system (Siremobil Iso-C3D). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:21–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hell B (1990) Atlas der Ultraschalldiagnostik im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

  13. Irnberger T (1985) Diagnostische Möglichkeiten und Wertigkeit der konventionellen Radiographie, Röntgentomographie und hochauflösenden Computertomographie beim komplexen orbitalen Trauma. Fortschr Röntgenstr 142:146–154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manson PN, Markowitz B, Mirvis S, Dunham M, Yaremchuk M (1990) Toward CT-based facial fracture treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:202–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McCann PJ, Brocklebank LM, Ayoub AF (2000) Assessment of zygomatico-orbital complex fractures using ultrasonography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:525–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ord RA, Le May M, Duncan JG, Moos KF (1981) Computerized tomography and B-Scan ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fractures of the medial orbital wall. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:281–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piette E, Lenoir JL, Reychler H (1987) The diagnostic limitations of ultrasonography in maxillofacial surgery. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 15:297–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rochels R (1987) Ultraschalldiagnostik bei Frakturen der knöchernen Orbita. In: Schwenzer N, Pfeifer G (eds) Fortschritte der Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Bd. 32. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 144–147

  19. Tonami H, Nauagawa T, Ohguchi M, Takarada A, Yamamoto JI, Karino K, Sasaki K (1987) Surface coil MR-imaging of orbital blowout fractures: a comparison with reformated CT. AJNR 8:445–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S (2002) Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:126–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. E. Friedrich.

Additional information

*Oral Presentation, 7th Riga-Rostock Symposium on Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Rostock, September 19–20, 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedrich, R.E., Heiland, M. & Bartel-Friedrich, S. Potentials of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures*. Clin Oral Invest 7, 226–229 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0232-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0232-5

Keywords

Navigation