Skip to main content
Log in

Performative technologies for heritage site regeneration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heritage sites are an important part of understanding our role in history. They have the potential to teach us important lessons, such as where we came from and subsequently, the people it has made us today. As members of a large, heritage-led, regeneration project, we are working with the Hafod–Morfa Copperworks, a heritage site in the Lower Swansea Valley where there is not much to see or hear. The few ruins at the site make it difficult to imagine what the site would have been like back in its heyday. Our goal at the site is to draw people together, not to view a finished piece of curated heritage, but rather, to start conversations about their memories and the significance of the site to them and to discover what they would like to see at the site in the future. The technology we are producing is about engaging with the local community and stakeholders as groups to provoke discussion. This contrasts with previous uses of mobile guides which only attempt to be tourist aids. In this article, we report on two prototype technologies we have developed to help accomplish this task. Throughout the article, we discuss how and why designing performative technologies could help encourage people to visit, socialise and communicate within the area. Our early results suggest that expressive performative technologies are good at gaining spectators’ attention and encouraging an active engagement between performer and spectator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.welshcopper.org.uk/en/Cu@Swansea.htm.

References

  1. Ardito C, Costabile M, De Angeli A, Lanzilotti R (2012) Enriching archaeological parks with contextual sounds and mobile technology. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 19(4):29–12930. doi:10.1145/2395131.2395136

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benford S, Crabtree A, Flintham M, Greenhalgh C, Koleva B, Adams M, Tandavanitj N, Farr JR, Giannachi G, Lindt I (2011) Creating the spectacle: designing interactional trajectories through spectator interfaces. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 18(3):11:1–11:28. doi:10.1145/1993060.1993061

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Betsworth L, Robinson S, Jones M (2013) Pico projection for performative place based services. EIPS Workshop at CHI ’13

  5. Bongers B (2012) The projector as instrument. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 16(1):65–75. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0378-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardiff J Her long black hair. http://www.cardiffmiller.com/artworks/walks/longhair.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2013

  7. Dalsgaard P, Hansen LK (2008) Performing perception–staging aesthetics of interaction. ACM Trans Comput–Hum Interact 15(3):13:1–13:33. doi:10.1145/1453152.1453156

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgerald E, Taylor C, Craven M (2013) To the castle! A comparison of two audio guides to enable public discovery of historical events. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(4):749–760. doi:10.1007/s00779-012-0624-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fosh L, Benford S, Reeves S, Koleva B, Brundell P (2013) See me, feel me, touch me, hear me: trajectories and interpretation in a sculpture garden. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’13. ACM, pp 149–158. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470675

  10. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday anchor books. Doubleday

  11. Goffman E (1966) Behavior in public places; notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  12. GoogleMaps: Google maps street view: National botanic garden of wales. http://goo.gl/maps/exaFC. Accessed 15 May 2013

  13. Hansen LK, Rico J, Jacucci G, Brewster S, Ashbrook D (2011) Performative interaction in public space. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’11. ACM, pp 49–52. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979595

  14. Heller F, Knott T, Weiss M, Borchers J (2009) Multi-user interaction in virtual audio spaces. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’09. ACM, pp 4489–4494

  15. Jacquemin C, Chan WK, Courgeon M (2010) Bateau ivre: an artistic markerless outdoor mobile augmented reality installation on a riverboat. In: Proceedings of the MM ’10. ACM, pp 1353–1362. doi:10.1145/1873951.1874218

  16. Jacucci C, Jacucci G, Wagner I, Psik T (2005) A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In: Proceedings of the CC ’05. ACM, pp 19–28. doi:10.1145/1094562.1094566

  17. Jacucci G, Peltonen P, Morrison A, Salovaara A, Kurvinen E, Oulasvirta A (2010) Ubiquitous media for collocated interaction. In: Shared encounters, CSCW. Springer, London, pp 23–45. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-727-1_2

  18. Jones M (2011) Journeying toward extravagant, expressive, place-based computing. Interactions 18(1):26–31. doi:10.1145/1897239.1897247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawsar F, Rukzio E, Kortuem G (2010) An explorative comparison of magic lens and personal projection for interacting with smart objects. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’10, pp 157–160. doi:10.1145/1851600.1851627

  20. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2011) Electronic mobile guides: a survey. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 15(1):97–111. doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0295-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. KewGardens: Kew gardens mobile application. http://www.kew.org/visit-kew-gardens/visit-information/garden-guides/mobile-app/. Accessed 15 May 2013

  22. Lab GR L.A.S.E.R. tag. http://www.graffitiresearchlab.com/blog/projects/laser-tag/. Accessed 15 Aug 2013

  23. Lozano-Hemmer R Projection artworks. http://www.lozano-hemmer.com/projects.php?keyword=projection. Accessed 15 Aug 2013

  24. Lucero A, Jones M, Jokela T, Robinson S (2013) Mobile collocated interactions: taking an offline break together. Interactions 20(2):26–32. doi:10.1145/2427076.2427083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marentakis GN, Brewster SA (2006) Effects of feedback, mobility and index of difficulty on deictic spatial audio target acquisition in the horizontal plane. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’06. ACM, pp 359–368. doi:10.1145/1124772.1124826

  26. McGookin D, Vazquez-Alvarez Y, Brewster S, Bergstrom-Lehtovirta J (2012) Shaking the dead: multimodal location based experiences for un-stewarded archaeological sites. In: Proceedings of the NordiCHI ’12. ACM, pp 199–208. doi:10.1145/2399016.2399048

  27. Morrison A, Oulasvirta A, Peltonen P, Lemmela S, Jacucci G, Reitmayr G, Näsänen J, Juustila A (2009) Like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’09. ACM, pp 1889–1898. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518991

  28. Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’05. ACM, pp 741–750. doi:10.1145/1054972.1055074

  29. Reid J, Geelhoed E, Hull R, Cater K, Clayton B (2005) Parallel worlds: immersion in location-based experiences. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’05. ACM, pp 1733–1736. doi:10.1145/1056808.1057009

  30. Reid J, Hull R, Cater K, Clayton B (2004) Riot! 1831: the design of a location based audio drama. In: Proceedings of the UK-UbiNet ’04, pp 1–2

  31. Rico J, Brewster S (2010) Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’10. ACM, pp 887–896. doi:10.1145/1753326.1753458

  32. Rico J, Jacucci G, Reeves S, Hansen LK, Brewster S (2010) Designing for performative interactions in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the UbiComp ’10 Adjunct. ACM, pp 519–522. doi:10.1145/1864431.1864503

  33. Rogers Y, Price S, Fitzpatrick G, Fleck R, Harris E, Smith H, Randell C, Muller H, O’Malley C, Stanton D, Thompson M, Weal M (2004) Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In: Proceedings of the IDC ’04. ACM, pp 3–10. doi:10.1145/1017833.1017834

  34. Rouillard J, Laroussi M (2008) PerZoovasive: contextual pervasive qr codes as tool to provide an adaptive learning support. In: Proceedings of the CSTST ’08, pp 542–548

  35. Rueb T Core sample. http://www.terirueb.net/core_sample/index.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2013

  36. Sauter D (2006) Light attack. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Art gallery. ACM. doi:10.1145/1178977.1179087

  37. Scheible J, Ojala T (2009) Mobispray: mobile phone as virtual spray can for painting big anytime anywhere on anything. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Art Gallery. ACM, pp 5:1–5:10. doi:10.1145/1667265.1667271

  38. Stahl C (2007) The roaring navigator: a group guide for the zoo with shared auditory landmark display. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’07. ACM, pp 383–386. doi:10.1145/1377999.1378042

  39. Taylor R, Schofield G, Shearer J, Wallace J, Wright P, Boulanger P, Olivier P (2011) Designing from within: humanaquarium. In: Proceedings of the CHI ’11. ACM, pp 1855–1864. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979211

  40. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K, Häkkilä J, Cassinelli A, Müller J, Rukzio E, Schmidt A (2013) Experiencing interactivity in public spaces (eips). In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’13. ACM, pp 3275–3278. doi:10.1145/2468356.2479665

  41. Vlahakis V, Karigiannis J, Tsotros M, Gounaris M, Almeida L, Stricker D, Gleue T, Christou IT, Carlucci R, Ioannidis N (2001) Archeoguide: first results of an augmented reality, mobile computing system in cultural heritage sites. In: Proceedings of the VAST ’01. ACM, pp 131–140. doi:10.1145/584993.585015

  42. Wecker AJ, Lanir J, Kuflik T, Stock O (2011) Pathlight: supporting navigation of small groups in the museum context. In: Proceedings of the MobileHCI ’11. ACM, pp 569–574. doi:10.1145/2037373.2037462

  43. Williamson JR (2011) Send me bubbles: multimodal performance and social acceptability. In: Proceedings of the CHI EA ’11. ACM, pp 899–904. doi:10.1145/1979742.1979513

  44. Williamson JR, Hansen LK (2012) Designing performative interactions in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the DIS ’12. ACM, pp 791–792. doi:10.1145/2317956.2318076

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Emma and Jen of the Future Interaction Technology Lab at Swansea University and also our reviewers for their invaluable comments and feedback on this article. We would also like to thank the National Botanic Garden of Wales for allowing us to work closely alongside them and conduct an experiment there. Additionally, we thank all of the participants who took part in the experiments mentioned in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Betsworth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betsworth, L., Bowen, H., Robinson, S. et al. Performative technologies for heritage site regeneration. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18, 1631–1650 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0766-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0766-3

Keywords

Navigation