Skip to main content
Log in

Designing ubiquitous information systems for a community of homeless young people: precaution and a way forward

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing upon and distinguishing themselves from domestic, public, work, and natural settings, homeless communities offer new cultural frontiers into which ubiquitous computing could diffuse. We report on one such frontier, a community of homeless young people, located in Seattle, WA, seeking both to foresee the consequences of pervasive access to digital media and communications and to prepare for its seemingly inevitable uptake. The community consists of hundreds of young people living without stable housing, often in the public, and an alliance of nine service agencies that seek to stabilize youth and equip them to escape homelessness. We examine the opportunities for ubiquitous computing in this community by, in part, developing a precautionary stance on intervention. This stance is then used to critically examine a scenario in which information about the service agencies is made public. From this scenario, and a description of the social and material constraints of this community, we argue that “precaution” offers productive counsel on decisions on whether and how to intervene with ubiquitous computing. A precautionary point of view is especially important as ubiquitous computing diffuses into communities that, by their social and material conditions, are vulnerable. In such communities, the active avoidance of harms and plans for their mitigation is particularly important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abowd GD, Mynatt ED (2000) Chartering past, present and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7:29–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry PJ, Ensign J, Lippek SH (2002) Embracing street culture: fitting health care into the lives of street youth. J Transcult Nurs 13:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell G, Dourish PY (2007) Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 11:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bidwell NJ, Browning D (2010) Pursuing genius loci: interaction design and natural places. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 14:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borning A, Friedman B, Davis J, Lin P (2005) Informing public deliberation: value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation ESCW 2005 (18–22 September 2005), pp 449–468

  6. boyd d (2008) Why youth (heart) social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Youth, identity, and digital media, MIT Press, pp 119–142

  7. Burrell J, Toyama K (2009) What constitutes good ICTD research? Inf Technol Int Dev 5(3):82–94

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carroll JM, Rosson MB (2008) Theorizing mobility in community networks. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66:944–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dvorak P (2009) On the street and on facebook: the homeless stay wired. Wall St J: A1

  10. Ensign J, Bell M (2004) Illness experiences of homeless youth. Qual Health Res 14:1239–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farnham SD, McCarthy JF, Patel Y, Ahuja S, Norman D, Hazlewood WR et al (2009) Measuring the impact of third place attachment on the adoption of a place-based community technology. In: Proceedings of CHI’09, pp 2153–2156

  12. Flanagan M, Howe DC, Nissenbaum H (2005) Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. In: Proceedings of CHI’05, pp 751–760

  13. Friedman B, Kahn PHJ, Borning A (2006) Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Human-computer interaction in management information systems: foundations, M.E. Sharp, pp 348–372

  14. Haraway D (1991) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature, pp 149–181

  15. Heeks R (2002) i-development not e-development: special issue on ICTs and development. J Int Dev 14(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horst HA (2010) Families. In: Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 149–294

  17. Kriebel D, Tichner J, Epstein P, Lemons J, Levins R, Loechler EL et al (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109(9):871–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Krippendorff K (2005) The semantic turn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Nathan LP, Friedman B, Klasjna PV, Kane SK, Miller JK (2008) Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In: Proceedings of DIS ‘08, pp 1–10

  20. Slesnick N, Glassman M, Garren R, Toviesse P, Bantchevska D, Dashora P (2008) How to open and sustain a drop-in center for homeless youth. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(7):727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Readings in distributed artificial intelligence 3, Morgan Kaufmann, pp 37–55

  22. Steinfield C, Ellison N, Lampe C (2008) Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol 29:434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sunstein CR (2005) Laws of fear: beyond the precautionary principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. University District, Seattle, Wikipedia: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_District_Seattle>

  25. Whiteside KH (2006) Precautionary politics: principle and practice in confronting environmental risk. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiener NA (1950/1954) The human use of human beings. Da Capo Paperback

  27. Wingert S, Higgitt N, Ristock J (2005) Voices from the margins: understanding street youth in Winnipeg. Can J Urban Res 14(1):54–80

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woelfer JP, Hendry DG (2009) Stabilizing homeless young people with information and place. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(11):2300–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Woelfer JP, Hendry DG (2010) Homeless young people’s experiences with information systems: life and work in a community technology center. In: Proceedings of CHI’10, pp 1291–1300

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Washington State Community Technology Opportunity Program for funding the purchase of hardware for the community technology center. We thank Mike Crandall for alerting us to this state funding; our collaborators at Street Youth Ministries, especially all of the young people with whom we have learned so much; Batya Friedman, Alan Borning, Lisa Nathan, and members of the Value Sensitive Design Research Laboratory for creating a stimulating intellectual environment; and the Globi-Comp 2009 workshop participants and the reviewers for their insightful feedback on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Palzkill Woelfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woelfer, J.P., Hendry, D.G. Designing ubiquitous information systems for a community of homeless young people: precaution and a way forward. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15, 565–573 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0341-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0341-5

Keywords

Navigation