Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum invasive posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA), characterized by amyotrophy and muscular weakness of the upper limbs, is caused by damage to anterior spinal root or anterior horn of the spinal cord. Formerly, anterior decompression and fusion were performed for treatment of CSA, but it has recently been reported that posterior decompression is also effective. However, a consensus on the choice of procedure has not yet been reached. Selective laminoplasty as minimally invasive surgery is a posterior decompression procedure that alleviates axial neck pain. Because, for CSA patients, the responsible lesion level is localized, this procedure combined with foraminotomy enables simultaneous spinal cord and root decompression. Therefore, we report the results of this treatment for CSA.

Methods

Subjects were 28 patients (25 males, 3 females), average age 50.6 years and average follow-up 43.5 months. The muscles involved were deltoid for 14 patients, biceps for 11, and extensor digitorum communis and/or intrinsic muscles of the hand for 9. MMT scores were grade 2 for 23 cases and grade 3 for 5 cases. To evaluate the results of minimally invasive surgery, cervical ROM (C2–7) and postoperative neck pain (VAS) on the first postoperative day and 1 week after surgery were evaluated.

Results

Muscle strength improvement was rated as “excellent” for 18 patients, “good“ for 9, and “fair” for 1, with none rated “poor”. Four of 10 patients whose muscle strength did not fully improve had distal type CSA and/or had preoperative MMT scores of 2. Average %ROM was 91.2 % and almost complete cervical ROM was maintained. The average postoperative VAS score was 2.6 on the first postoperative day and 1.2 1 week after surgery.

Conclusions

Selective laminoplasty with segmental decompression is advantageous for minimizing postoperative neck pain and for simultaneous decompression of the affected spinal cord segment and nerve root.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sobue I, Kato H, Yanagi T. Clinical characteristics of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Rinsho Seikeigeka. 1975;10:999–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shinomiya K, Komori H, Matsuoka T, Mutoh N, Furuya K. Neuroradiologic and electrophysiologic assessment of cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Spine. 1994;19:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Imamura T, Morimoto N. Dissociated motor loss in the upper extremities; clinical features and pathophysiology. Spine. 1993;18:1964–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Fujimori Y, Nakanishi K, Kamei N, Ochi M. Surgical outcome of posterior decompression for cervical spondylosis with unilateral upper extremity amyotrophy. Spine. 2006;31:E728–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T. Results of skip laminectomy—minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 2003;28:2667–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, Harada T, Ikeda T, Kubo T. Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine. 2005;30:2414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keegan JJ. The cause of dissociated motor loss in the upper extremity with cervical spondylosis. A case report. J Neurosurg. 1965;23:528–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Toyoda K, Kato Y, Azuma Y, Kawai S. Distal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. Assessment of pathophysiology from radiological findings on magnetic resonance imaging and epidurally recorded spinal cord responses. Spine. 2004;29:E185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV. Complication following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury. 2011;42:S3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujiwara K. Cervical spondylotic amyotrophy with intramedullary cavity formation. Spine. 2001;26:E220–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iizuka H, Shimizu T, Tateno K, Toda N, Edakuni H, Shimada H, Takagishi K. Extensor musculature of the cervical spine after laminoplasty. Morphological evaluation by coronal view of the magnetic resonance image. Spine. 2001;26:2220–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Yoshikawa H. C3–6 laminoplasty takes over C3–7 laminoplasty with significantly lower incidence of axial neck pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:1375–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsuneo Takebayashi.

About this article

Cite this article

Takebayashi, T., Yoshimoto, M., Ida, K. et al. Minimum invasive posterior decompression for cervical spondylotic amyotrophy. J Orthop Sci 18, 205–207 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0330-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0330-9

Keywords

Navigation