Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques for unstable sacral fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the study was to assess the stability provided by an ilio-iliac dorsal plate fixation technique using an AO narrow DCP on the pelvic brim in vertically and rotationally unstable type-C pelvic ring injuries.

Materials and methods

We examined 12 fresh cadaver pelvises in a single limb stance load. A type-C pelvic ring injury (a type I lateral sacral fracture in the classification of Denis with symphysis pubis rupture) was performed on the cadaver specimen and fixed with a four-hole narrow dynamic compression plate to stabilize the symphysis pubis rupture; the sacrum fracture was stabilized either anteriorly with two 3-hole reconstruction plates (“anterior plate osteosynthesis”) or with a posterior fixation using a 12-hole narrow DCP. A cyclic load of between 100 and 250 N was applied to the fifth lumbar vertebra of the specimen. An extensometer was attached to both sides of the sacrum fracture to detect movements at the fracture site.

Results

We were able to achieve usable measurements in nine specimens. Three measurements were performed on each specimen, and the movements recorded at the fracture gap in trans-sacral plate fixation were higher than or similar to those observed for anterior plate synthesis in 23 out of 27 cases.

Conclusion

Dorsal ilio-iliac bridge plate fixation provides somewhat reduced stability compared to anterior plate fixation, but the difference is not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:67–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbons K, Soloniuk D, Razack N. Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures. J Neurosurg. 1990;72:889–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ragnarsson B, Olerud C, Olerud S. Anterior square-plate fixation of sacroiliac disruption 2–8 years follow up of 23 consecutive cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993;64(2):138–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Szita J. Experimental and clinical analysis of pelvic ring injuries (doctoral thesis). Budapest: Semmelweis University; 1992.

  5. van Zwienen CMA, van den Bosch EW, Snijders CJ, Kleinrensink G. Biomechanical comparison of sacroiliac screw techniques for unstable pelvic ring fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schildhauer TA, Ledoux WR, Chapman JR, Henley MB, Tencer AF, Routt ML Jr. Triangular osteosynthesis and iliosacral screw fixation for unstable sacral fractures: a cadaveric and biomechanical evaluation under cyclic loads. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:2–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sagi HC, Ordway NR, DiPasquale T. Biomechanical analysis of fixation for vertically unstable sacroiliac dislocations with iliosacral screws and symphyseal plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:138–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MacAvoy M, McCellan R, Trigg P, Goodman SB, Chien Chi-Ray D, Allen WA, van der Meulen MCH. Stability of open book pelvic fractures using a new biomechanical model of single-limb stance. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:590–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van den Bosch E, van Zwienen C, van den Bosch E, Hoek van Dijke GA, Snijders CJ, van Vugt AB. Sacroiliac screw fixation for tile B fractures. J Trauma. 2003;55:962–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bodzay T, Burján T, Bagdi C, Flóris I, Vendégh Zs, Váradi K. Evaluation of stabilization methods of pelvic ring injuries by finite element modeling. Joint Dis Relat Surg. 2007;18(3):108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Kim J, Davidson J, Etheridge B, Alonso J, Eberhardt A. Biomechanical response of the pubic symphysis in lateral pelvic impacts: a finite element study. J Biomech. 2007;40(12):2758–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hüfner T, Pohlemann T, Tarte S, Gänslen A, Geerling J, Bazak N, Citak M, Nolte LP, Krettek C. Computer-assisted fracture reduction of pelvic ring fractures: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;399:231–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yinger K, Scalise J, Olson S, Bay B, Finkemeyer C. Biomechanical comparison of pelvic ring fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The experiments were completed with the support of the Laboratory of Biomechanics, University of Debrecen. The statistical analysis was done by Jolán Józan. The graphical figures were drawn by Dr. Balázs Deák.

Conflict of interest

I, Dr. Bodzay Tamás, as author of the paper, disclose any financial or personal relationship with other people or organistions as a third party that could inappropriately influence (bias) our work, including employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations and grants or any other funding. All co-authors agree with this statement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Bodzay.

About this article

Cite this article

Bodzay, T., Szita, J., Manó, S. et al. Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques for unstable sacral fractures. J Orthop Sci 17, 574–579 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0246-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0246-4

Keywords

Navigation