Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Background

Lumbar surgery and associated complications are increasing as society is aging. However, definitions of complications after lumbar surgery have not been established and previous reports have varied in the definition of, and focus on, intraoperative or major postoperative complications. We analyzed the frequency and severity of perioperative complications and all minor adverse events in lumbar surgery at a single center.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all lumbar surgery, including decompression surgery with or without fusion, at Meijo Hospital over a 10-year period. Perioperative complications and all surgery-related adverse events until 1 month postoperatively were reviewed for 1012 operations on 918 patients (average age 54 years old). The incidence of intraoperative complications was compared between junior (<10 years experience of spine surgery) and senior (≥10 years experience) surgeons.

Results

Perioperative complications and adverse events occurred in 159 operations (15.7%) on 127 patients (13.8%). There were a variety of perioperative adverse events, including digestive problems. Of the 159 complications and events, 24 (2.4%) were intraoperative and 135 (13.3%) were postoperative. Incidence of intraoperative complications was not significantly higher for junior surgeons; however, the operations performed by senior surgeons were significantly more invasive. Complications were more frequent in elderly patients (p < 0.01) and in operations that were longer (p < 0.0001), had greater estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001), and involved use of spinal instrumentation (p < 0.0001). Psychotic symptoms occurred significantly more often in older patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The absence of a relationship between the experience of the surgeon and incidence of intraoperative complications may be because of the greater effect of invasive surgery. Although age and invasiveness were associated with more perioperative adverse events, we do not conclude that major surgery should be avoided for elderly patients. In contrast, careful focus on the surgical indication and procedure is required for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham DJ, Herkowitz HN, Katz JN. Indications for thoracic and lumbar spine fusion and trends in use. Orthop Clin N Am. 1998;29:803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, Chan L. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2006;31:1957–63. (discussion 64).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine. 2006;31:2707–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirza SK, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Lee LA, Goodkin R. Towards standardized measurement of adverse events in spine surgery: conceptual model and pilot evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel N, Bagan B, Vadera S, Maltenfort MG, Deutsch H, Vaccaro AR, Harrop J, Sharan A, Ratliff JK. Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Acosta FL, Cloyd JM, Aryan HE, Ames CP. Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of multilevel circumferential lumbar spinal fusion in the elderly. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16:69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Johnson L. The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures. Spine. 1995;20:1592–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM. Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior–posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:203–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glassman SD, Alegre G, Carreon L, Dimar JR, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of lumbar instrumentation and fusion in patients with diabetes mellitus. Spine J. 2003;3:496–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ, Ciol MA. Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1992;74:536–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine. 1993;18:1463–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:722–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell PG, Malone J, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff JK. Early complications related to approach in thoracic and lumbar spine surgery: a single center prospective study. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yadla S, Malone J, Campbell PG, Nasser R, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff JK. Incidence of early complications in cervical spine surgery and relation to preoperative diagnosis: a single-center prospective study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;24:50–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grob D, Mannion AF. The patient’s perspective on complications after spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(Suppl 3):380–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratliff JK, Lebude B, Albert T, Anene-Maidoh T, Anderson G, Dagostino P, Maltenfort M, Hilibrand A, Sharan A, Vaccaro AR. Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:578–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003;85-A:2089–92.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson RP, McManus AC. The iliac buttress. A computed tomographic study of sacral anatomy. Spine. 1993;18:1318–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kostuik JP, Valdevit A, Chang HG, Kanzaki K. Biomechanical testing of the lumbosacral spine. Spine. 1998;23:1721–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27:97–132. (quiz 3–4; discussion 96).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K, Oha F, Togawa D. Effective prevention of surgical site infection using a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline-based antimicrobial prophylaxis in lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:327–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Andrus ML, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:609–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bono CM, Watters WC 3rd, Heggeness MH, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Baisden J, Ben-Galim P, Easa JE, Fernand R, Lamer T, Matz PG, Mendel RC, Patel RK, Reitman CA, Toton JF. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the use of antithrombotic therapies in spine surgery. Spine J. 2009;9:1046–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms Keiko Ogura for her assistance throughout this study.

Conflict of interest

No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiro Imagama.

About this article

Cite this article

Imagama, S., Kawakami, N., Tsuji, T. et al. Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci 16, 510–515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0123-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-011-0123-6

Keywords

Navigation