Skip to main content
Log in

Normal and threshold values of radiographic parameters for knee osteoarthritis using a computer-assisted measuring system (KOACAD): the ROAD study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Background

Although radiographic severity of the knee is commonly determined by the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scale, it does not separately assess joint space narrowing or osteophyte formation. The present study aimed to establish normal and threshold values of radiographic parameters for knee osteoarthritis (OA) using the knee osteoarthritis computer-aided diagnosis (KOACAD) measuring system on a large-scale population-based cohort of the Research on Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) population.

Methods

From a total of 3040 participants in the ROAD study, standing anteroposterior radiographs of the knee were obtained from 2975 subjects (1041 men, 1934 women) in the ROAD cohort, and 5950 knees were evaluated using the KOACAD system to obtain the medial and lateral minimum joint space width (mJSW), medial and lateral joint space area (JSA), osteophyte area (OPA), and femorotibial angle (FTA). These indices were compared with the KL scores, and cutoff values for radiographic knee OA were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The mean KOACAD parameters for KL = 0 were as follows: medial mJSW 3.70 mm; lateral mJSW 4.77 mm, medial JSA 125.0 mm2, lateral JSA 140.0 mm2, OPA 0, and FTA 176.1° in men; for women they were medial mJSW 3.26 mm, lateral mJSW 4.22 mm, medial JSA 100.9 mm2, lateral JSA 111.0 mm2, OPA 0, and FTA 174.9°. Threshold values for KL ≥ 2 provided by ROC curve analysis with area under the curve (AUC) > 0.7 were medial mJSW 2.8 mm and medial JSA 107.3 mm2 in men and medial mJSW 2.7 mm in women. Those for KL ≥ 3 were medial mJSW 2.1 mm, medial JSA 81.1 mm2, OPA 2.4 mm2, and FTA 179.6° in men; and medial mJSW 2.1 mm, medial JSA 66.6 mm2, OPA 2.5 mm2, and FTA 178.1° in women. We then determined the cutoff values for medial knee OA and lateral knee OA.

Conclusions

The present study established normal and threshold values of parameters for knee OA using an automated computer-assisted program on plain radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2007) The outline of the results of National Livelihood Survey 2007 available at http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/20-19-1.html.

  2. Du H, Chen SL, Bao CD, Wang XD, Lu Y, Gu YY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in Huang-Pu District, Shanghai, China. Rheumatol Int 2005;25:585–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart DJ, Spector TD. The relationship of obesity, fat distribution and osteoarthritis in women in the general population: the Chingford Study. J Rheumatol 1993;20:331–335.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JJ, Felson DT. Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in the first national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES I): evidence for an association with overweight, race, and physical demands of work. Am J Epidemiol 1988;128:179–189.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellgren JH, Lawrence LS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamada T, Kawano H, Koshizuka Y, Fukuda T, Yoshimura K, Kamekura S, et al. Carminerin contributes to chondrocyte calcification during endochondral ossification. Nat Med 2006;12:665–670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamekura S, Kawasaki Y, Hoshi K, Shimoaka T, Chikuda H, Maruyama Z, et al. Contribution of runt-related transcription factor 2 to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis in mice after induction of knee joint instability. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:2462–2470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones G, Ding C, Scott F, Glisson M, Cicuttini F. Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004;12:169–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oka H, Muraki S, Akune T, Mabuchi A, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, et al. Fully automatic quantification of knee osteoarthritis severity on standard radiographs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:1300–1306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Mabuchi A, En-yo Y, Yoshida M, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis and osteoporosis in Japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab 2009;27:620–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T. Cohort profile: Research on Osteoarthritis/Osteoporosis Against Disability (ROAD) study. Int J Epidemiol (in press, 2010).

  12. Altman R, Brandt K, Hochberg M, Moskowitz R, Bellamy N, Bloch DA, et al. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society: results from a workshop. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996;4:217–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gensburger D, Arlot M, Sornay-Rendu E, Roux JP, Delmas P. Radiologic assessment of age-related knee joint space changes in women: a 4-year longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:336–343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coventry MB. Upper tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:1136–1140.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cerejo R, Dunlop DD, Cahue S, Channin D, Song J, Sharma L. The influence of alignment on risk of knee osteoarthritis progression according to baseline stage of disease. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2632–2636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koshino T. Surgical treatment of arthrosis deformans of the knee: high tibial osteotomy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1971;45:1121–1133.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Assessing the fit of the model. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, editors. Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley; 2000. p. 143–202.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15(suppl A):A1–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neogi T, Felson D, Niu J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P, et al. Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies. BMJ 2009;339:b2844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Oka, H., Muraki, S., Akune, T. et al. Normal and threshold values of radiographic parameters for knee osteoarthritis using a computer-assisted measuring system (KOACAD): the ROAD study. J Orthop Sci 15, 781–789 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1545-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1545-2

Keywords

Navigation