Skip to main content
Log in

Hip structure analysis of bisphosphonate-treated Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of a 1-year treatment with either alendronate or risedronate on the proximal femoral geometry among Japanese women with osteoporosis by hip structure analysis. Postmenopausal women who had taken at least 90% of their prescription for alendronate (35 mg/week, 94 patients) or risedronate (17.5 mg/week, 181 patients) for 1 year were retrospectively analyzed. In the alendronate treatment group, bone mineral density (BMD), cross-sectional area (CSA), section modulus and average cortex significantly increased by 0.81, 1.35, 2.23 and 0.97% at the narrow neck and increased by 2.19, 2.28, 2.85 and 1.11% at the intertrochanteric, respectively. Buckling ratio at the intertrochanteric significantly decreased by 2.50%. The CSA, section modulus and average cortex at the shaft significantly increased at 1 year. In the risedronate treatment group, the CSA, section modulus and average cortex at the narrow neck significantly increased by 0.80, 0.95 and 0.89%, respectively. BMD, CSA, section modulus, and average cortex at the intertrochanteric significantly increased by 1.61, 0.88, 2.05 and 0.79%, respectively, and buckling ratio significantly decreased by 1.53%. BMD, CSA, section modulus, and average cortex at the shaft significantly increased. The percent change of section modulus was significantly correlated with that of BMD, CSA and average cortex and negatively correlated with that of buckling ratio at all regions in both treatment groups. Statistically significant differences between the alendronate and risedronate groups were seen for section modulus in the narrow neck and CSA in the intertrochanteric. In conclusion, Japanese osteoporotic women treated by either alendronate or risedronate showed significant improvements of geometry in proximal femur within 1 year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359:1929–1936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller PD (2003) Bone mass measurements. Clin Geriatr Med 19:281–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schott AM, Cormier C, Hans D, Favier F, Hausherr E, Dargent-Molina P, Delmas PD, Ribot C, Sebert JL, Breart G, Meunier PJ, for EPIDOS Group (1998) How hip and whole-body bone mineral density predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS Prospective Study. Osteoporos Int 8:247–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Z, Meredith MP, Hoseyni MS (2001) A method to assess the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate endpoint. Stat Med 20:3175–3188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Harris F, Genant HK, Ensrud K, LaCroix AZ, Dennis M, Black DM (2002) Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs. Am J Med 112:281–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarkar S, Mitlak BH, Wong M, Stock JL, Black DM, Harper KD (2002) Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy. J Bone Miner Res 17:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW Jr, Rao GU (1990) Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: a structural approach. Invest Rad 25:6–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Scott WW Jr, Plato CC, Tobin JD, Quan CA (1992) Sex differences in geometry of the femoral neck with aging: a structural analysis of bone mineral data. Calcif Tissue Int 50:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Bissessur K (1993) Age-related changes in female femoral neck geometry: implications for bone strength. Calcif Tissue Int 53(Suppl 1):S41–S46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang XF, Duan Y, Beck TJ, Seeman E (2005) Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age. Bone 36:978–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Uusi-Rasi K, Beck TJ, Semanick LM, Daphtary MM, Crans GG, Desaiah D, Harper KD (2006) Structural effects of raloxifene on the proximal femur: results from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation trial. Osteoporos Int 17:575–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenspan SL, Beck TJ, Resnick NM, Bhattacharya R, Parker RA (2005) Effect of hormone replacement, alendronate, or combination therapy on hip structure geometry: a 3-year, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 20:1525–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Uusi-Rasi K, Semanick LM, Zanchetta JR, Bogado CE, Eriksen EF, Sato M, Beck TJ (2005) Effects of teriparatide [rh PTH (1–34)] treatment on structural geometry of the proximal femur in elderly osteoporotic women. Bone 36:948–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnick SL, Beck TJ, Cosman F, Hochberg MC, Wang H, de Papp AE (2009) DXA-based hip structural analysis of once-weekly bisphosphonate-treated postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Osteoporos Int 20:911–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beck TJ, Lewiecki EM, Miller PD, Felsenberg D, Liu Y, Ding B, Libanati C (2008) Effects of denosumab on the geometry of the proximal femur in postmenopausal women in comparison with alendronate. J Clin Densitom 11:351–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takada J, Beck TJ, Iba K, Yamashita T (2007) Structural trends in the aging proximal femur in Japanese postmenopausal women. Bone 41:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Takada J, Miki T, Imanishi Y, Nakatsuka K, Wada H, Naka H, Yoshizaki T, Iba K, Beck TJ, Yamashita T (2010) Effects of raloxifene treatment on structural geometry of the proximal femur in Japanese women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 28:561–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito M, Sone T, Fukunaga M (2010) Effect of minodronic acid hydrate on hip geometry in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 28:334–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uchida S, Taniguchi T, Shimizu T, Kakikawa T, Okuyama K, Okaniwa M, Arizono H, Nagata K, Santora AC, Shiraki M, Fukunaga M, Tomomitsu T, Ohashi Y, Nakamura T (2005) Therapeutic effects of alendronate 35 mg once weekly and 5 mg once daily in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a double-blind, randomized study. J Bone Miner Metab 23:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kishimoto H, Fukunaga M, Kushida K, Shiraki M, Itabashi A, Nawata H, Nakamura T, Ohta H, Takaoka K, Ohashi Y, for the Risedronate Phase III Research Group (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly administration of 17.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with 2.5-mg once-daily dosage regimen. J Bone Miner Metab 24:405–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Osteoporosis diagnostic criteria review committee: Japanese society for bone, mineral research (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hans D, Duboeuf F, Schott AM, Horn S, Avioli LV, Drezner MK, Meunier PJ (1997) Effects of a new positioner on the precision of hip bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res 12:1289–1294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1983) Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae––a biomechanical investigation. I. Method and general patterns of variation. Am J Phys Anthropol 60:359–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Melton LJ III, Beck TJ, Amin S, Khosla S, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Riggs BL (2005) Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women. Osteoporos Int 16:460–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson DA, Barondess DA, Hendrix SL, Beck TJ (2000) Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 15:1992–1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Thomas J. Beck for his assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichi Takada.

About this article

Cite this article

Takada, J., Katahira, G., Iba, K. et al. Hip structure analysis of bisphosphonate-treated Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 29, 458–465 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-010-0242-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-010-0242-8

Keywords

Navigation