Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design of a pragmatic approach to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent treatment for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures

Rationale, aims and organization of a Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT) initiated by the Research Group of Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of osteoporosis treatment is to prevent future fractures. Although concurrent treatment has been used very frequently for osteoporosis in clinical practice, there are no data on accurate and verified effectiveness of concurrent treatment for fracture prevention in patients with osteoporosis. To clarify the clinical usefulness of concurrent treatment, the Japan Osteoporosis Society has authorized the establishment of the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) research group. The objective of this research is to establish a design for a clinical trial to prove whether concurrent treatment using both alfacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol) and alendronate is more effective as compared to treatment using alendronate alone in terms of fracture prevention. The present study was named JOINT (Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial) and is based on a method using national, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, blinded endpoints focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis with a high risk for fracture. The patients were mainly selected by practitioners and allocated randomly by a central registration system into two groups, of which one received 5 mg/day of alendronate alone, and the other received 1 μg/day of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (alfacalcidol) in addition to the alendronate. The endpoints focused primarily on fracture prevention, and the patients’ quality of life (QOL) and change in body height, as well as adherence and the adverse events of the treatments were evaluated secondarily. To obtain sufficient statistical power in the events during a 2-year observation period, the patients who are expected to have higher risk were selected to participate in this study, and it was decided that the final plan would involve 890 patients per group (two-sided alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8). Data collection began in November 2003. Correspondence regarding the registration of the investigator and the progress of the study was conducted through a web system from the Public Health Research Foundation to practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C, Kanis J (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280:2077–2082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, Chesnut CH 3rd, Brown J, Eriksen EF, Hoseyni MS, Axelrod DW, Miller PD (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. JAMA 282:1344–1352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, Glüer CC, Krueger K, Cohen FJ, Eckert S, Ensrud KE, Avioli LV, Lips P, Cummings SR (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 282:637–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiraki M, Kushida K, Fukunaga M, Kishimoto H, Taga M, Nakamura T, Kaneda K, Minaguchi H, Inoue T, Morii H, Tomita A, Yamamoto K, Nagata Y, Nakashima M, Orimo H (1999) A double-masked multicenter comparative study between alendronate and alfacalcidol in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Research Group. Osteoporos Int 10:183–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kushida K, Shiraki M, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Morii H, Yamamoto K, Kaneda K, Fukunaga M, Inoue T, Nakashima M, Orimo H (2002) The efficacy of alendronate in reducing the risk for vertebral fracture in Japanese patients with osteoporosis. Curr Ther Res 63:606–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kushida K, Shiraki M, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Morii H, Yamamoto K, Kaneda K, Fukunaga M, Inoue T, Nakashima M, Orimo H (2004) Alendronate reduced vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis: a 3-year follow-up study. J Bone Miner Metab 22:462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sckett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine; what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J 312:71–72

    Google Scholar 

  11. Japanese Osteoporosis Guideline 2006, Chief editor: Hajime Orimo, Life science Publish corp (article in Japanese)

  12. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. http://www.imcj.go.jp/rinri/main/02.htm (article in Japanese)

  13. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, Kotzin S, Laine C, Marusic A, Overbeke AJ, Schroeder TV, Sox HC, Van Der Weyden MB (2004) International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 292:1363–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiraki M, Ohta H, Hosoi T, Kuroda T, Orimo H (2003) A-TOP study plane (3), survey of bisphosphonate. Osteoporosis Jpn 11:665–669 (article in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fujita T, Orimo H, Inoue T, Kaneda K, Sakurai M, Morita R, Morii H, Yamamoto K, Takaoka K (1993) Double-blind multicenter comparative study with alfacalcidol of etidronate disodium (EHDP) in involutional osteoporosis. Clin Eval 21:261–302

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fukunaga M, Nakamura T, Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Ohta H, Hosoi T, Orimo H (2004) Absolute height reduction and percent height ratio of the vertebral body in incident fracture in Japanese women. J Bone Miner Metab 22:104–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Nakamura T, Fukunaga M, Hosoi T, Orimo H, Makino K, Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group (2006) The sample size required for intervention studies on fracture prevention can be decreased by using a bone resorption marker in the inclusion criteria: prospective study of a subset of the Nagano Cohort, on behalf of the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group. J Bone Miner Metab 24:219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frediani B (1998) Effects of combined treatment with calcitriol plus alendronate on bone mass and bone turnover in postmenopausal osteoporosis two year of continuous treatment. Clin Drug Invest 15:235–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Rosen C (2002) Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23:570–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JOQOL Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee: Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Delmas PD, Seeman E (2004) Changes in bone mineral density explain little of the reduction in vertebral or nonvertebral fracture risk with anti-resorptive therapy. Bone 34:599–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Earstell R, Barton I, Hannon RA, Chines A, Garnero P, Delmas PD (2003) Relationship of early changes in bone resorption to the reduction in fracture risk with risedronate. J Bone Miner Res 18:1051–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Seibel MJ, Naganathan V, Barton I, Grauer A (2004) Relationship between pretreatment bone resorption and vertebral fracture incidence in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with risedronate. J Bone Miner Res 19:323–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E (2003) Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:965–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallagher AM, Rietbrock S, Olson M, van Staa TP (2008) Fracture outcomes related to persistence and compliance with oral bisphosphonates. J Bone Miner Res 23:1569–1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamatari M, Koto S, Ozawa N, Urao C, Suzuki Y, Akasaka E, Yanagimoto K, Sakota K (2007) Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronate. J Bone Miner Metab 25:302–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rabenda V, Hiligsmann M, Reginster JY (2009) Poor adherence to oral bisphosphonate treatment and its consequences: a review of the evidence. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10:2303–2315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express thanks to the chairman (Dr. Rikushi Morita) and the members of the ethics committee: Ms. Mamiko Matsumura, Dr. Tetsuro Inoue, Dr. Isao Yoshimura, Dr. Mitsuyoshi Nakajima, Tooru Ebihara, R.Ph., Mr. Shinya Hattori and Mr. Kousaku Uchida. This JOINT study was sponsored by the Public Health Research Foundation. The authors would like to thank those who participated as clinical investigators in JOINT-02. The authors also thank the Japan Arteriosclerosis Prevention Fund, Teijin Pharma Limited, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, GE Healthcare Japan, Toyo Medic Co., Ltd., Banyu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., for their generous donations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masataka Shiraki.

Additional information

For the A-TOP (Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis) Research Group.

About this article

Cite this article

Shiraki, M., Kuroda, T., Miyakawa, N. et al. Design of a pragmatic approach to evaluate the effectiveness of concurrent treatment for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 29, 37–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-010-0188-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-010-0188-x

Keywords

Navigation