Skip to main content
Log in

High-impact exercise frequency per week or day for osteogenic response in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency per week or day of high-impact, low-repetition jump exercise for osteogenic response was assessed by two experiments. In the first experiment, 48 11-week-old rats were randomly divided into five groups: a sedentary control (W0: n = 8), one exercise session per week (W1: n = 10), three exercise sessions per week (W3: n = 10), five exercise sessions per week (W5: n = 10), and seven exercise sessions per week (W7: n = 10). In the second experiment, 30 11-week-old rats were randomly divided into three groups: a sedentary control (D0: n = 10), one exercise session per day (D1: n = 10), and two exercise sessions per day (D2: n = 10). One exercise session consisted of 10 continuous jumps. After 8 weeks of the exercise period, the jump exercise increased the fat-free dry weight of the tibia in the W1 (7.5%, n.s.), W3 (12.6%, P < 0.01), W5 (12.0%, P < 0.01), and W7 (19.8%, P < 0.001) groups compared with the W0 group. The jump exercise also increased the fat-free dry weight in the D1 (12.0%, P < 0.001) and D2 (13.0%, P < 0.001) groups compared with the D0 group. These increases were accompanied by increased bone strength and cortical area at the mid-shaft. The results in the present study suggest that for bone gain, it is not always necessary to do high-impact exercise every day, although exercising every day does have the greatest effect. The results in this study also suggest that there is little additional benefit if bones are loaded by two separate exercise sessions daily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berard A, Bravo G, Gauthier P (1997) Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of physical activity for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 7:331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace BA, Cumming RG (2000) Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre-and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 67:10–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static vs. dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 17:897–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Perren SM, Huggler A, Russenberger M, Allgower M, Mathys R, Schenk R, Willenegger H, Muller ME (1969) The reaction of cortical bone to compression. Acta Orthop Scand 125(suppl):19–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37:411–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner CH, Owan I, Takano Y (1995) Mechanotransduction in bone: role of strain rate. Am J Physiol 269(3 pt 1):E438–E442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mosley JR, March BM, Lynch J, Lanyon LE (1997) Strain magnitude related changes in whole bone architecture in growing rats. Bone (NY) 20:191–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mosley JR, Lanyon LE (1998) Strain rate as a controlling influence on adaptive modeling in response to dynamic loading of the ulna in growing male rats. Bone (NY) 23:313–318

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Yamauchi T, Kurono M, Mashiko S (1997) Five jumps per day increase bone mass and breaking force in rats. J Bone Miner Res 12:1480–1485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Umemura, Y, Sogo N, Honda A (2002) Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading. J Appl Physiol 93:1345–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Umemura Y, Baylink DJ, Wergedal JE, Mohan S, Srivastava AK (2002) A time course of bone response to jump exercise in C57BL/6J mice. J Bone Miner Metab 20:209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McKay HA, MacLean L, Petit M, MacKelvie-O’Brien K, Janssen P, Beck T, Khan KM (2005) “Bounce at the Bell”: a novel program of short bouts of exercise improves proximal femur bone mass in early pubertal children. Br J Sports Med 39:521–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kato T, Terashima T, Yamashita T, Hatanaka Y, Honda A, Umemura Y (2006) Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women. J Appl Physiol 100:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Macdonald HM, Kontulainen SA, Khan KM, McKay HA (2007) Is a school-based physical activity intervention effective for increasing tibial bone strength in boys and girls? J Bone Miner Res 22:434–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Umemura Y, Ishiko T, Tsujimoto H, Miura H, Mokushi N, Suzuki H (1995) Effects of jump training on bone hypertrophy in young and old rats. Int J Sports Med 16:364–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66:397–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner CH (1998) Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone (NY) 23:399–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Frost HM (1987) Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: a proposal. Anat Rec 219:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frost HM (1997) On our age-related bone loss: insights from a new paradigm. J Bone Miner Res 12:1539–1546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH (2000) Partitioning a daily mechanical stimulus into discrete loading bouts improves the osteogenic response to loading. J Bone Miner Res 15:1596–1602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH (2001) Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone. J Exp Biol 204:3389–3399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Shorter, more frequent mechanical loading sessions enhance bone mass. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Welch JM, Weaver CM, Turner CH (2004) Adaptations to free-fall impact are different in the shafts and bone ends of rat forelimbs. J Appl Physiol 97:1859–1865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagihara Y, Fukuda S, Goto S, Iida H, Yamazaki M, Moriya H (2005) How many days per week should rats undergo running exercise to increase BMD? J Bone Miner Metab 23:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pead MJ, Skerry TM, Lanyon LE (1988) Direct transformation from quiescence to bone formation in the adult periosteum following a single brief period of bone loading. J Bone Miner Res 3:647–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Forwood MR, Turner CH (1994) The response of rat tibiae to incremental bouts of mechanical loading: a quantum concept for bone formation. Bone (NY) 15:603–609

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chow JW, Jagger CJ, Chambers TJ (1993) Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae. Am J Physiol 265(2 pt 1):E340–E347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihisa Umemura.

About this article

Cite this article

Umemura, Y., Nagasawa, S., Honda, A. et al. High-impact exercise frequency per week or day for osteogenic response in rats. J Bone Miner Metab 26, 456–460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0848-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-007-0848-7

Key words

Navigation