Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the positioning performances for DP vessels considering thruster failure modes by a novel synthesized criterion

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For safety critical offshore operations, the dynamically positioned (DP) vessel should maintain reasonable positioning performance even under the circumstance of thruster failure. In this case, thruster failure mode analysis is often taken into account when designing a new DP vessel. In this paper, the positioning performances of the vessels with thruster failure modes are investigated by time domain simulations. A novel synthesized positioning performance criterion is proposed to quantify the positioning performance including the aspects of positioning accuracy and power consumption. The synthesized criterion concerns how well the vessel is positioned rather than how large the environmental conditions that the vessel can counteract. A semi-submersible employed with eight azimuth thrusters is adopted to perform the simulation. It can be concluded from the obtained results that, if the thruster system is well designed, thruster failure may not affect the thrust system in supplying sufficient thrust force with two or less than two thrusters failure for the semi-submersible. With four thrusters failure, the thrust system tries its best to counteract the environmental yaw moment in order to keep its heading, however, it cannot supply sufficient forces to assist the semi-submersible going back to its desired position, which is very dangerous in practical operation. Therefore, the failed thrusters should be timely maintained to guarantee safe operation and to save power. The performance of the thrust re-allocation logic dealing with thruster failure during the simulation is also approved. Finally, several design guideline regarding improvement of the positioning performance of the vessel after thruster failure have been summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brink A, Chung JS (1981) Automatic position control of a 300,000 tons ship during ocean mining operations. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore Technology Conference

  2. Chen H, Moan T, Verhoeven H (2008) Safety of dynamic positioning operations on mobile offshore drilling units. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(7):1072–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faltinsen OM (1990) Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge University Press

  4. Faÿ H (1990) Dynamic positioning systems: principles. Design and Applications, Technip

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fossen TI (2011) Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Fossen TI, Strand JP (1999) Passive nonlinear observer design for ships using lyapunov methods: full-scale experiments with a supply vessel. Automatica 35(1):3–16

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu M, Ning J, Wei Y (2011) Fault-tolerant control of dynamic positioning vessel by means of a virtual thruster. In: Mechatronics and automation (ICMA), 2011 international conference on IEEE, pp 1706–1710

  8. Johansen TA, Fossen TI, Berge SP (2004) Constrained nonlinear control allocation with singularity avoidance using sequential quadratic programming. Control Syst Techn IEEE Trans 12(1):211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan MJ (1978) Dynamic positioning of offshore vessels. Petroage Publishing Co

  10. Serraris J-J (2009) Time domain analysis for dp simulations. In: ASME 2009 28th international conference on Ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 595–605

  11. Skjetne R, Egeland O (2006) Hardware-in-the-loop testing of marine control systems. Model Identif Control 27(4):239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sørensen AJ (2011) A survey of dynamic positioning control systems. Annu Rev Control 35(1):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sørensen AJ, Ronxss M (2002) Mathematical modeling of dynamically positioned and thruster-assisted anchored marine vessels. Ocean Eng Handb 1:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sørensen AJ, Strand JP (2000) Positioning of small-waterplane-area marine constructions with roll and pitch damping. Control Eng Pract 8(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spjtvold J, Johansen TA (2009) Fault tolerant control allocation for a thruster-controlled floating platform using parametric programming. In: Decision and control, 2009 held jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese control conference. CDC/CCC 2009. Proceedings of the 48th IEEE conference on IEEE, pp 3311–3317

  16. Tannuri E, Pesce C, Alves G, Masetti I, Ribas Ferreira P, Umeda C (2002) Dynamic positioning of a pipeline launching barge. In: The twelfth international offshore and polar engineering conference. International society of offshore and polar engineers

  17. Wichers JEW (1988) A simulation model for a single point moored tanker. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft

  18. Xu S, Li B, Wang X, Wang L (2016a) A novel real-time estimate method of wave drift force for wave feed-forward in dynamic positioning system. Ships Offshore Struct 11(7):747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu S, Wang L, Wang X (2015a) Local optimization of thruster configuration based on a synthesized positioning capability criterion. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng 7(6):1044–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu S, Wang L, Wang X, Li B (2016b) Experimental evaluation on a newly developed dynamic positioning time domain simulation program. J Ship Mech 20(03):265–276

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu S, Wang X, Wang L, Li B et al (2016c) A dynamic forbidden sector skipping strategy in thrust allocation for marine vessels. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 26(2):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu S, Wang X, Wang L, Meng S, Li B (2015b) A thrust sensitivity analysis based on a synthesized positioning capability criterion in DPCap/DynCap analysis for marine vessels. Ocean Eng 108:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu X, Yang J, Li X, Xu L (2015c) Time-domain simulation for coupled motions of three barges moored side-by-side in floatover operation. China Ocean Eng 29:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto I (2001) Robust and non-linear control of marine system. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 11(13):1285–1341

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto I (2016) Practical robotics and mechatronics: marine, space and medical applications. The Institution of Engineering and Technology

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51709170), the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (Mooring position technology: floating support platform engineering(II)), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0303405) and the Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 17YF1409700).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuefeng Wang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, S., Wang, X., Wang, L. et al. Investigation of the positioning performances for DP vessels considering thruster failure modes by a novel synthesized criterion. J Mar Sci Technol 23, 605–619 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0496-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0496-0

Keywords

Navigation