Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chirurgische und interventionelle Behandlung der chronisch-kritischen Beinischämie

Surgical and interventional treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia

  • CME Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
Gefässchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die chronisch-kritische Beinischämie (CLI) ist die schwerste Form der peripher-arteriellen Verschlusskrankheit und geht mit einem erhöhten Risiko für letale kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse einher. Die meisten Patienten überleben aber die ersten Jahre nach Diagnosestellung und sind für den Erhalt ihrer Selbständigkeit auf eine nachhaltige Verbesserung der Beindurchblutung angewiesen. Dieser CME-Artikel fasst die chirurgischen und endovaskulären Optionen zur Revaskularisierung zusammen und geht auf deren Nachhaltigkeit bei CLI ein. Grenzen der verfügbaren Evidenz werden aufgezeigt. Sie beruhen vor allem auf dem Fehlen einer einheitlichen Definition des Behandlungserfolges. Ein klinisch orientierter Lösungsvorschlag wird diskutiert, der helfen könnte, die verschiedenen Behandlungsindikationen zu schärfen. Da sich aber nur die wenigsten Patienten gleich gut für verschiedene Verfahren eignen, werden CLI-Patienten auch in Zukunft am besten in einem interdisziplinär arbeitenden Team betreut sein.

Abstract

Chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the most severe form of peripheral arterial occlusive disease and is associated with an increased risk for fatal cardiovascular events. However, most patients survive the first years after diagnosis and, to remain independent, depend on durable improvement of limb perfusion. This CME article summarizes the various surgical and endovascular options of revascularization in the context of CLI and discusses their durability. Available evidence is limited which is mainly due to a lack of a generally accepted outcome definition of clinical treatment success. A recently proposed clinically driven measure of success is discussed and how its use could improve definition of specific indications. As only few patients are clinically equally suitable for various treatment options, CLI patients will certainly remain to be managed best within interdisciplinary teams with close collaboration between surgeons and interventionalists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2007) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45 (Suppl) S:S5–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR et al (2004) High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis 172:95–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schanzer A, Conte MS (2010) Critical limb ischemia. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 12:214–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diehm N, Silvestro A, Baumgartner I et al (2009) Chronic critical limb ischemia: European experiences. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 50:647–653

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dick F, Diehm N, Galimanis A et al (2007) Surgical or endovascular revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia: influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome. J Vasc Surg 45:751–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T et al (2005) Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9501):1925–1934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeRubertis BG, Faries PL, McKinsey JF et al (2007) Shifting paradigms in the treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: a report of 1000 percutaneous interventions. Ann Surg 246:415–422; discussion 422–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J et al (2010) Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: an intention-to-treat analysis of amputation-free and overall survival in patients randomized to a bypass surgery-first or a balloon angioplasty-first revascularization strategy. J Vasc Surg 51 (5 Suppl):5S–17S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lepantalo M, Matzke S (1996) Outcome of unreconstructed chronic critical leg ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11:153–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conte MS, Bandyk DF, Clowes AW et al (2006) Results of PREVENT III: a multicenter, randomized trial of edifoligide for the prevention of vein graft failure in lower extremity bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg 43:742–751; discussion 751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowkes F, Leng GC (2008) Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD002000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Albers M, Romiti M, Brochado-Neto FC et al (2006) Meta-analysis of popliteal-to-distal vein bypass grafts for critical ischemia. J Vasc Surg 43:498–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klinkert P, Post PN, Breslau PJ, Bockel JH van (2004) Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27:357–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Twine CP, McLain AD (o J) Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD001487

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arvela E, Soderstrom M, Alback A et al (2010) Arm vein conduit vs prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia. J Vasc Surg 52:616–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J et al (2010) Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg 51 (5 Suppl):18S–31S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brosi P, Dick F, Do DD et al (2007) Revascularization for chronic critical lower limb ischemia in octogenarians is worthwhile. J Vasc Surg 46:1198–1207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diehm N, Baumgartner I, Jaff M et al (2007) A call for uniform reporting standards in studies assessing endovascular treatment for chronic ischaemia of lower limb arteries. Eur Heart J 28:798–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dick F, Katzen BT (2009) Superficial femoral artery stents are an expensive luxury and have no advantage over angioplasty – against the motion. In: Greenhalgh RM (Hrsg) Vascular and endovascular controversies update. BIBA, London, S 257–263

  20. Krankenberg H, Schluter M, Steinkamp HJ et al (2007) Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: the femoral artery stenting trial (FAST). Circulation 116:285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P et al (2007) Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation 115:2745–2749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J et al (2006) Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial. J Endovasc Ther 13:701–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T et al (2008) Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med 358:689–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Siablis D, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K et al (2007) Sirolimus-eluting versus bare stents after suboptimal infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: enduring 1-year angiographic and clinical benefit. J Endovasc Ther 14:241–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Romiti M, Albers M, Brochado-Neto FC et al (2008) Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 47:975–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferraresi R, Centola M, Ferlini M et al (2009) Long-term outcomes after angioplasty of isolated, below-the-knee arteries in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37:336–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Faglia E, Dalla Paola L, Clerici G et al (2005) Peripheral angioplasty as the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of 993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between 1999 and 2003. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29:620–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Diehm N, Diehm C, Kalka C, Dick F (2008) Peripheral endovascular revascularization trials: high noon for uniform reporting standards. Acta Chir Belg 108:382–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Dick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dick, F., von Allmen, R. & Diehm, N. Chirurgische und interventionelle Behandlung der chronisch-kritischen Beinischämie. Gefässchirurgie 16, 55–70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-010-0863-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00772-010-0863-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation