Skip to main content
Log in

Chronische myeloische Leukämie

Heilung durch medikamentöse Therapie?

Chronic myeloid leukemia

Cure by drug therapy?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Onkologe Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Aufklärung der molekularen Pathogenese der chronischen myeloischen Leukämie (CML) und die Einführung von Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren (TKI) haben die Prognose dieser Krankheit erheblich verbessert. Aufgrund der Therapieerfolge der CML nimmt die Prävalenz stetig zu. Blastenkrisen treten mit einer Inzidenz von 1–2% pro Jahr auf; ihre Behandlungsmöglichkeiten sind begrenzt. Zur optimalen Therapie der CML gehört neben der Anwendung moderner Therapien die Nutzung standardisierter molekularzytogenetischer Überwachungsmethoden. Die Anwendung der Zweitgenerations-TKI als Erstlinientherapie erbringt rasche und tiefe molekulare Remissionen mit der besten Chance, die Therapie nach einigen Jahren im Rahmen von Studien beenden zu können. Die CML tritt in allen Altersgruppen auf. Bei einem medianen Alter von 55–60 Jahren sind die Therapien von Kindern und jungen Erwachsenen sowie von älteren Patienten mit Komorbiditäten besondere Herausforderungen. Umfassende Information der Patienten und ihrer Familien über die Art der Erkrankung, die Bedeutung der kontinuierlichen dosisgerechten Medikamenteneinnahme sowie regelmäßige Mitteilung des erreichten zytogenetischen und molekularen Therapieansprechens sind Schlüsselfaktoren für eine optimale Compliance.

Abstract

Elucidation of the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has transformed this disease from being invariably fatal to being the type of leukemia with the best prognosis. However, blast crises occur in 1–2 % of patients per year. Treatment options for blast crises are limited and survival is short. Due to the overall therapeutic success the prevalence of CML is gradually increasing. Optimal management of this disease includes access to modern therapies and standardized surveillance methods for all patients. The first line use of second generation TKIs provides the best chance to achieve fast and deep responses with the potential to eventually discontinue therapy. Standardized laboratory methods are required to provide optimal surveillance according to current recommendations. Comprehensive information on the nature of the disease, the urgent need for day by day drug intake using the appropriate dosages and timely communication of efficacy data are key factors for optimal compliance. All age groups are affected by CML but despite a median age of 55–60 years, particular challenges are the management of the disease in children, young adults and elderly patients with co-morbidities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Apperley JF, Cortes JE, Kim DW et al (2009) Dasatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase after imatinib failure: the START A trial. J Clin Oncol 27:3472–3479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F et al (2009) Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 27:6041–6051

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burchert A, Muller MC, Kostrewa P et al (2010) Sustained molecular response with interferon alfa maintenance after induction therapy with imatinib plus interferon alfa in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 28:1429–1435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortes J, Kim DW, Raffoux E et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of dasatinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase. Leukemia 22:2176–2183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cortes JE, Baccarani M, Guilhot F et al (2010) Phase III, randomized, open-label study of daily imatinib mesylate 400 mg versus 800 mg in patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase using molecular end points: tyrosine kinase inhibitor optimization and selectivity study. J Clin Oncol 28:424–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cortes JE, Kim DW, Kantarjian HM et al (2012) Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the BELA trial. J Clin Oncol. J Clin Oncol 30:3486–3492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cross NC, Melo JV, Feng L, Goldman JM (1994) An optimized multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of BCR-ABL fusion mRNAs in haematological disorders. Leukemia 8:186–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross NC, White HE, Müller MC et al (2012) Standardized definitions of molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia, im Druck/doi:10.1038/leu.2012.104

  9. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O’Brien SG et al (2006) Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 355:2408–2417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fabarius A, Leitner A, Hochhaus A et al (2011) Impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations at diagnosis on prognosis of CML: long-term observation of 1151 patients from the randomized CML Study IV. Blood 118:6760–6768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Giles FJ, Kantarjian HM, le Coutre PD et al (2012) Nilotinib is effective in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic phase. Leukemia 26:959–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Goldman JM et al (1998) Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Chronic leukemia working party of the european group for blood and marrow transplantation. Lancet 352:1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanfstein B, Müller MC, Hehlmann R et al (2012) Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Leukemia 26:2096–2102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V et al (2011) Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood 118:686–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hehlmann R (2012) How I treat CML blast crisis. Blood 120:737–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Baccarani M (2007) Chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet 370:342–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Jung-Munkwitz S et al (2011) Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-alpha in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:1634–1642

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Deininger M et al (2008) Dasatinib induces durable cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib. Leukemia 22:1200–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hochhaus A, Kreil S, Corbin AS et al (2002) Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy. Leukemia 16:2190–2196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hochhaus A, La Rosée P (2004) Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance. Leukemia 18:1321–1331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hochhaus A, La Rosée P, Müller MC et al (2011) Impact of BCR-ABL mutations on patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cell Cycle 10:250–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hochhaus A, O’Brien SG, Guilhot F et al (2009) Six-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 23:1054–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes T, Saglio G, Branford S et al (2009) Impact of baseline BCR-ABL mutations on response to nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. J Clin Oncol 27:4204–4210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabbour E, Deininger M, Hochhaus A (2011) Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 25:201–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kantarjian H, Shah NP, Hochhaus A et al (2010) Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 362:2260–2270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kantarjian HM, Giles FJ, Bhalla KN et al (2011) Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood 117:1141–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Cortes JE et al (2011) Dasatinib or imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: 2-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). Blood 119(5):1123–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Larson RA, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP et al (2012) Nilotinib vs imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 3-year follow-up. Leukemia 26:2197–2203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. le Coutre PD, Giles FJ, Hochhaus A et al (2012) Nilotinib in patients with Ph + chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase following imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Leukemia 26:1189–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J et al (2010) Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 11:1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Milojkovic D, Nicholson E, Apperley JF et al (2010) Early prediction of success or failure of treatment with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 95:224–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Müller MC, Cortes JE, Kim DW et al (2009) Dasatinib treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of responses according to preexisting BCR-ABL mutations. Blood 114:4944–4953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Müller MC, Cross NC, Erben P et al (2009) Harmonization of molecular monitoring of CML therapy in Europe. Leukemia 23:1957–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolini FE, Basak GW, Soverini S et al (2011) Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients harboring T315I BCR-ABL mutated leukemias. Blood 118:5697–5700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA et al (2003) Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 348:994–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Preudhomme C, Guilhot J, Nicolini FE et al (2010) Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 363:2511–2521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rohrbacher M, Hasford J (2009) Epidemiology of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 22:295–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S et al (2010) Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 362:2251–2259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Saussele S, Lauseker M, Gratwohl A et al (2010) Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era: evaluation of its impact within a subgroup of the randomized German CML Study IV. Blood 115:1880–1885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Simonsson B, Gedde-Dahl T, Markevarn B et al (2011) Combination of pegylated IFN-alpha2b with imatinib increases molecular response rates in patients with low- or intermediate-risk chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 118:3228–3235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Soverini S, Hochhaus A, Nicolini FE et al (2011) BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet. Blood 118:1208–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weisberg E, Manley PW, Cowan-Jacob SW et al (2007) Second generation inhibitors of BCR-ABL for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer 7:345–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Andreas Hochhaus: Forschungsunterstützung und Honorare (Novartis, BMS, Ariad, Pfizer, MSD). Thomas Ernst und Janine Ziermann: Keine. Ekkehard Eigendorff: Forschungsunterstützung und Honorare (Novartis). Paul La Rosée: Forschungsunterstützung und Honorare (Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hochhaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochhaus, A., Ernst, T., Ziermann, J. et al. Chronische myeloische Leukämie. Onkologe 18, 1105–1114 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2352-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-012-2352-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation