Introduction

The family Flaviviridae encompasses four genera and 89 species [1]. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) [5] recently made a number of changes to the names of genera and species in the family. This review describes these changes and the reasons for them. As a guide for those working in the flavivirus field, we also provide a comprehensive list of the previous and new nomenclature for each species and their viruses.

New genus name Orthoflavivirus

The genus Flavivirus within the family Flaviviridae was established for a large number of arthropod-borne viruses (e.g., dengue viruses and Zika virus) that are high-consequence human and veterinary pathogens [6]. The genus name Flavivirus contained the word stem “flavi”, which is also used for the family name. Therefore, the vernacular terms “flaviviral”, “flavivirus”, and “flaviviruses” were ambiguous, as these words might have referred to all members of the family (viruses of the genera Flavivirus, Hepacivirus, Pegivirus, and Pestivirus) or only to those of the genus Flavivirus.

To preclude this potential confusion, a taxonomic proposal (TaxoProp 2022.007S.A.Flaviviridae_1genren_sprenamed) was submitted to the ICTV in 2022. It proposed that the genus Flavivirus be renamed Orthoflavivirus, which roughly translates to “true flaviviruses” or “flaviviruses sensu stricto”. This proposal was approved by the ICTV Executive Committee in late 2022 and ratified by the ICTV in April 2023 [2, 9]. Consequently, the terms “flaviviral”, “flavivirus”, and “flaviviruses” should be used to refer to the collective members of the family Flaviviridae, whereas the terms “orthoflaviviral”, “orthoflavivirus”, and “orthoflaviviruses” should be used for viruses of the genus Orthoflavivirus (all orthoflaviviruses are flaviviruses, but not all flaviviruses are orthoflaviviruses).

Change to species names in the family Flaviviridae

In March 2021, the ICTV ratified TaxoProp 2018.001G.R.binomial_species, which requires all species names to follow a new codified rule:

"A species name shall consist of only two distinct word components separated by a space. The first word component shall begin with a capital letter and be identical in spelling to the name of the genus to which the species belongs. The second word component shall not contain any suffixes specific for taxa of higher ranks. The entire species name (both word components) shall be italicized" [3, 7].

The purpose of this rule is to differentiate more clearly the name of a virus from the name of the species (taxon) to which it is assigned by using the standardized genus + species epithet format found elsewhere in biological taxonomy nomenclature [8]. For orthoflaviviruses, this change was particularly relevant because most species names were the same as the virus names, apart from the orthography; e.g., yellow fever virus was a member of the species Yellow fever virus, a situation that created confusion.

The new binomial rule required all names of species previously included in the genus Flavivirus to adhere to the format “Orthoflavivirus xxxxxx”, in which “xxxxxx” represents a single word. At the same time, the opportunity was taken to abandon the single-letter species epithets used for names of species included in the genera Hepacivirus, Pegivirus, and Pestivirus and instead establish a consistent naming format within the family Flaviviridae. New species names were proposed according to guidance outlined by Postler et al. [4] in the same proposal that addressed the genus name issue (TaxoProp 2022.007S.A.Flaviviridae_1genren_sprenamed). Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 list the current taxonomy of the family Flaviviridae, including the prior species names as a reference; Table 5 provides guidance for applying the updated nomenclature in manuscripts.

Table 1 Changes to species names in the genus Hepacivirus
Table 2 Changes to species names in the genus Orthoflavivirus
Table 3 Changes to species names in the genus Pegivirus
Table 4 Changes to species names in the genus Pestivirus
Table 5 Identification of potential nomenclature problems in manuscripts pertaining to the family Flaviviridae and its viruses

As with species-renaming proposals elsewhere in virus taxonomy, it should be stressed that these changes to the names of virus species have no influence on the names of the viruses classified within them. Thus, for instance, the virus name “Zika virus” and its abbreviation “ZIKV” remain unchanged even though the species, Zika virus, was renamed Orthoflavivirus zikaense. Similarly, hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains the same, whereas the species was renamed Hepacivirus hominis.

Conclusion

We hope this description of the modifications and replacements of genus and species names is of value by both explaining the reasons for the nomenclature changes and providing a useful reference list for those working in the field. The ICTV Online Report chapter on the family Flaviviridae has also been updated with the new genus and species names [6].