Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Codon usage bias in herpesvirus

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, I present a comprehensive analysis of codon usage bias in 43 herpesviruses for which the whole genome has been sequenced. The values of the effective number of codons revealed that the majority of the herpesviruses did not have high codon bias, with the exceptions of only simplexviruses and some varicelloviruses. The results of correspondence analysis, a plot of ENC and GC content at the third position of the codon and analysis of preferred codons all revealed that the codon bias was mainly influenced by nucleotide composition. This suggests that mutation pressure is the main factor influencing codon usage bias in herpesviruses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Babiuk LA, Babiuk SL, Baca-Estrada ME (2002) Novel vaccine strategies. Adv Virus Res 58:29–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradel-Tretheway BG, Zhen Z, Dewhurst S (2003) Effects of codon-optimization on protein expression by the human herpesvirus 6 and 7 U51 open reading frame. J Virol Methods 111:145–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fu MH, Deng RQ, Wang JW, Wang XZ (2008) Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis of herpesvirus. Acta Virol 52:31–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gouy M, Gautier C (1982) Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 25:7055–7074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall JD, Gibbs JS, Coen DM, Mount DW (1986) Structural organization and unusual codon usage in the DNA polymerase gene from herpes simplex virus type 1. DNA 5:281–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jia RY, Cheng AC, Wang MS, Xin HY, Guo YF, Zhu DK, Qi XF (2009) Analysis of synonymous codon usage in the UL24 gene of duck enteritis virus. Virus Genes 38:96–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang Y, Deng F, Wang HL, Hu ZH (2008) An extensive analysis on the global codon usage pattern of baculoviruses. Arch Virol 153:2273–2282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlin S, Blaisdell BE, Schachtel GA (1990) Contrasts in codon usage of latent versus productive genes of Epstein-Barr virus: data and hypotheses. J Virol 64:4264–4273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lloyd AT, Sharp PM (1992) Evolution of codon usage patterns: the extent and nature of divergence between Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 20:5289–5295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma XR, Xiao SB, Fang LR, Chen HC (2005) Bias of base composition and codon usage in pseudorabies virus genes. Acta Genet Sin 32:616–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcgeoch DJ, Dolan A, Ralph AC (2000) Toward a comprehensive phylogeny for mammalian and avian herpesviruses. J Virol 74:10401–10406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McInerney JO (1998) GCUA (General Codon Usage Analysis). Bioinformatics 14:372–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mueller S, Papamichail D, Coleman JR, Skiena S, Wimmer E (2006) Reduction of the rate of poliovirus protein synthesis through large-scale codon deoptimization causes attenuation of viral virulence by lowering specific infectivity. J Virol 80:9687–9696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perrie`re G, Thioulouse J (2002) Use and misuse of correspondence analysis in codon usage studies. Nucleic Acids Res 30:4548–4555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Powell JR, Moriyama EN (1997) Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila. J Mol Evol 45:514–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shackelton LA, Parrish CR, Holmes EC (2006) Evolutionary basis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in vertebrate DNA viruses. J Mol Evol 62:551–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharp PM, Li WH (1986) Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. Nucleic Acids Res 14:7737–7749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharp PM, Stenico M, Peden JF, Lloyd AT (1993) Codon usage, mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Biochem Soc Trans 21:835–841

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR (1986) Codon usage in yeast, cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 14:1525–5143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith NGC, Eyre-Walker A (2001) Synonymous codon bias is not caused by mutation bias in G + C-rich genes in humans. Mol Biol Evol 18:982–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright F (1992) The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene 87:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Doctoral Initiation Foundation of Guangdong University of Technology, Grant 083036, a grant from 211 Project of Guangdong University of Technology and the National Science Foundation, Grant 30772739.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghui Fu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, M. Codon usage bias in herpesvirus. Arch Virol 155, 391–396 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0597-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-010-0597-0

Keywords

Navigation