Skip to main content
Log in

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Tentorial Meningiomas

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Radical microsurgical resection is the procedure of choice for tentorial meningiomas. Despite advances in microsurgery, tentorial meningiomas continue to challenge surgeons and patients. To evaluate the response of tentorial meningiomas, we evaluated 41 patients who had Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery during a 9 year period. Patient age varied from 32 to 79 years. Headache, trigeminal neuralgia, or facial paraesthesia were the most common presenting symptoms. Sensory deficits in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve were the most common finding. Eighteen patients (44%) had undergone between 1 and 5 (mean, 1.9) resections prior to radiosurgery; 23 had tumors diagnosed by neuroimaging. The average tumor diameter in this series was 20 mm. The maximum tumor dose varied from 24 to 40 Gy (mean, 30.5 Gy), and the tumor margin dose varied from 12 to 20 Gy (mean, 15.3 Gy). During the average follow-up interval of 3 years (range, 1–8 years), 19 patients had clinical improvement, 20 remained stable, and 2 patients deteriorated. Follow-up imaging showed a reduction in tumor size in 18 patients, no further tumor growth in 22, and an increase in tumor size in one (overall tumor control rate of 98%). Stereotactic radiosurgery using the Gamma Knife was a safe and effective primary or adjuvant treatment for patients with tentorial meningiomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muthukumar, N., Kondziolka, D., Dade Lunsford, L. et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Tentorial Meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140, 315–321 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050104

Navigation