Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive value of diffusion-weighted MRI for tumor consistency and resection rate of nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas

  • Clinical Article - Brain Tumors
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Backgrounds

Firm tumor consistency is one of the most important factors that impede sufficient removal of pituitary macroademoas via a transsphenoidal approach. The utility of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the tumor consistency and successfulness of transsphenoidal resection was evaluated in this study.

Methods

Thirty consecutive primary cases of nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas were prospectively enrolled. Conventional and DW MRI were done for all the patients and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and the signal intensity of the solid tumor were determined. Intraoperative report of tumor consistency, the degree of fibrosis and percentage of collagen content were documented. The 8 weeks postoperative MRI was used for calculation of the tumor resection rate.

Results

The tumor consistency was soft in 10 patients (33.3 %), intermediate in 14 patients (46.7 %) and hard in 6 patients (20 %). The mean collagen content percentage was 10, 23.5 and 66 % (p = 0.009) and the average resection rate was 75, 43 39 % in the three groups respectively (p = 0.001). The mean ADC value was not significantly correlated with the tumor consistency and resection rate. Tumors with isointense to hyperintense signal on DW MRI were more commonly removable by suction and had higher resection rates than those with hypointense signals (p = 0.019). For ADC values within the range of 600–740 × 10-3 mm2/s, a residual volume larger than 20 % of the tumor was more likely.

Conclusions

DW MRI was useful to predict the tumor consistency, collagen content and the chance of removal of pituitary macroadenomas through endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, and is recommended in the preoperative patient evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kontogeorgos G (2005) Classification and pathology of pituitary tumors. Endocrine 28:27–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boxerman JL, Rogg JM, Donahue JE, Machan JT, Goldman MA, Doberstein CE (2010) Preoperative MRI evaluation of pituitary macroadenoma: imaging features predictive of successful transsphenoidal surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(3):720–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pierallini A, Caramia F, Falcone C, Tinelli E, Paonessa A, Ciddio AB, Fiorelli M, Bianco F, Natalizi S, Ferrante L, Bozzao L (2006) Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—initial experience 1. Radiology 239(1):223–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson CB (1979) Neurosurgical management of large and invasive pituitary tumors. In: Tindall GT, Collins WF (eds) Clinical management of pituitary disorders. Raven, New York, pp 335–342

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirofumi N, Satoh E, Nukui H (2002) Technical considerations of transsphenoidal removal of fibrous pituitary adenomas and evaluation of collagen content and subtype in the adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 42(5):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Snow RB, Lavyne MH, Lee BC, Morgello S, Patterson RH Jr (1986) Craniotomy versus transsphenoidal excision of large pituitary tumors: the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in guiding the operative approach. Neurosurgery 19(1):59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki C, Maeda M, Hori K, Kozuka Y, Sakuma H, Taki W, Takeda K (2007) Apparent diffusion coefficient of pituitary macroadenoma evaluated with line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neuroradiol 34(4):228–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmoud OM, Tominaga A, Amatya VJ, Ohtaki M, Sugiyama K, Sakoguchi T, Kinoshita Y, Takeshima Y, Abe N, Akiyama Y, El-Ghoriany AI, Abd Alla AK, El-Sharkawy MA, Arita K, Kurisu K, Yamasaki F (2011) Role of PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the evaluation of pituitary adenomas. Eur J Radiol 80(2):412–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stadnik TW, Chaskis C, Michotte A, Shabana WM, van Rompaey K, Luypaert R, Budinsky L, Jellus V, Osteaux M (2001) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of intracerebral masses: comparison with conventional MR imaging and histologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(5):969–976

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rennert J, Doerfler A (2007) Imaging of sellar and parasellar lesions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109(2):111–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bammer R (2003) Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 45(3):169–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagar VA, Ye JR, Ng WH, Chan YH, Hui F, Lee CK, Lim CC (2008) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnosing atypical or malignant meningiomas and detecting tumor dedifferentiation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(6):1147–1152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamed F, Abouhashem S (2013) Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessment of pituitary macroadenoma consistency. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 44(3):617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ciric I, Mikhael M, Stafford T, Lawson L, Garces R (1983) Transsphenoidal microsurgery of pituitary macroadenomas with long-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 59(3):395–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iuchi T, Saeki N, Tanaka M, Sunami K, Yamaura A (1998) MRI prediction of fibrous pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140(8):779–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zada G, Du R, Laws ER Jr (2011) Defining the “edge of the envelope”: patient selection in treating complex sellar-based neoplasms via transsphenoidal versus open craniotomy. J Neurosurg 114(2):286–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bahuleyan B, Raghuram L, Rajshekhar V, Chacko AG (2006) To assess the ability of MRI to predict consistency of pituitary macroadenomas. Br J Neurosurg 20(5):324–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchfelder M, Nistor R, Fahlbusch R, Huk WJ (1993) The accuracy of CT and MR evaluation of the sella turcica for detection of adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas in Cushing disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14(5):1183–1190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakrabortty S, Oi S, Yamaguchi M, Tamaki N, Matsumoto S (1993) Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: MR characteristics and pre- and postoperative evaluation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 33(2):81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yrjänä SK, Tuominen H, Karttunen A, Lähdesluoma N, Heikkinen E, Koivukangas J (2006) Low-field MR imaging of meningiomas including dynamic contrast enhancement study: evaluation of surgical and histopathologic characteristics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(10):2128–2134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Calvar JA, Meli FJ, Romero C, Calcagno ML, Yánez P, Martinez AR, Lambre H, Taratuto AL, Sevlever G (2005) Characterization of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index. J Neurooncol 72(3):273–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo AC, Cummings TJ, Dash RC, Provenzale JM (2002) Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. Radiology 224(1):177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagiwara A, Inoue Y, Wakasa K, Haba T, Tashiro T, Miyamoto T (2003) Comparison of growth hormone–producing and non–growth hormone–producing pituitary adenomas: imaging characteristics and pathologic correlation. Radiology 228(2):533–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maysam Alimohamadi.

Additional information

Comment

This paper presents data which show that MRI ADC levels can predict the resectability of pituitary adenomas, the premise being that firm tumors are harder to remove entirely. Whether this is helpful will depend on the skill of the surgeon, as a firm tumor can be easier to remove using the extra capsular approach, which has been shown to have long term advantages.

Mike Powell,

London, UK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alimohamadi, M., Sanjari, R., Mortazavi, A. et al. Predictive value of diffusion-weighted MRI for tumor consistency and resection rate of nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas. Acta Neurochir 156, 2245–2252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2259-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2259-6

Keywords

Navigation