Abstract
Background
Typically, vestibular schwannomas (VS) react to Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with a transient increase of tumor volume owed to tumor swelling at about 6 months followed by a reduction of tumor volume owed to tumor shrinkage at about 18 months. It is important to distinguish this transient tumor expansion (TTE) from tumor growth. We undertook this study to see if there is a typical time interval in the follow-up of VS following GKRS, which may indicate tumor growth rather than TTE.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the patient charts of patients who underwent GKRS for unilateral sporadic VS at the Gamma Knife Center Zurich from 1994–2009 and who were treated by J. Siegfried or one of the authors (TM). Tumor progression was defined as an increase of tumor volume of ≥ 20 % as compared to the initial tumor volume at the earliest 2 years following GKRS. This time interval of ≥ 2 years was chosen in order to distinguish TTE from genuine tumor progression. Whenever tumor enlargement was suspected on follow-up MRI at ≥ 2 years following GKRS, tumor volumes were measured using custom software.
Results
From 1994–2009, 235 patients underwent GKRS in Zurich for unilateral sporadic VS. Tumor progression with a volume increase of ≥ 20 % occurred in 21/235 (8.9 %) patients at 3.4 ± 0.9 years following GKRS. Seventeen out of 235 (7 %) patients had a clinically relevant tumor progression requiring microsurgery or repeat radiosurgery.
Conclusions
According to our data, time may be a good parameter distinguishing tumor progression due to tumor growth from TTE due to tumor swelling in VS following GKRS. Tumor growth seems to occur at about 3–4 years following GKRS for VS as opposed to TTE, which seems to be present at about 6–18 months following GKRS for VS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Kato T, Iizuka H, Kuramitsu S, Yamamoto T (2013) Long-term safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: evaluation of 440 patients more than 10 years after treatment with Gamma Knife surgery. J Neurosurg 118:557–565
Lomax NJ, Scheib SG (2003) Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:1409–1419
Meijer OWM, Weijmans EJ, Knol DL, Slotman BJ, Barkhof F, Vandertop WP, Castelijns JA (2008) Tumor-volume changes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: implications for follow-up MR imaging protocol. Am J Neuroradiol 29:906–910
Mindermann T, Schlegel I (2013) Grading of vestibular schwannomas and corresponding tumor volumes: ramifications for radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir 155:71–74
Nagano O, Higuchi Y, Serizawa T, Ono J, Matsuda S, Yamakami I, Saeki N (2008) Transient expansion of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 109:811–816
Pollock B (2006) Management of vestibular schwannomas that enlarge after stereotactic radiosurgery: treatment recommendations based on a 15-year experience. Neurosurgery 58:241–248
Scheib SG, Gianolini S, Haller D, Wellis GN, Siegfried J (2000) VOLUMESERIES: a software tool for target volume follow-up studies with computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):203–207
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mindermann, T., Schlegel, I. How to distinguish tumor growth from transient expansion of vestibular schwannomas following Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir 156, 1121–1123 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2063-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2063-3