Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The use of vancomycin powder reduces surgical reoperation in posterior instrumented and noninstrumented spinal surgery

  • Experimental research - Spine
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infections can complicate posterior spine surgery. Multiple hospital admissions may be required to adequately treat a surgical site infection, which is associated with increased costs and lower patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic intra-wound vancomycin powder in reducing the incidence of repeat surgery for infections after posterior instrumented and noninstrumented spine surgery.

Methods

A series of consecutive patients who underwent instrumented or noninstrumented posterior spine surgery for any indication by two surgeons from July 2010 to July 2012 were reviewed. The preoperative antibiotic regimens of both surgeons were identical, except that one surgeon applied 1 g vancomycin powder directly to the surgical bed before wound closure, while the other did not. Patient demographics, operative details, and rates of reoperation for wound infection in the control and the treatment groups were compared.

Results

Both the control group and treatment group consisted of 150 patients; mean ages were 58.33 and 54.14 years, respectively. Both groups had low rates of deep infection requiring surgical intervention. The treatment group had a significantly lower rate of infection requiring reoperation or surgical debridement (0 %; 95 % CI: 0 %–2.4 %) compared with the control group (4 %; 95 % CI: 1.5 %–8.5 %) (P = 0.0297). The six infections identified in the control group resulted in 12 repeat operative debridement procedures. Gram-positive organisms were identified in 66.7 % of infections. No complications were related to the application of vancomycin powder.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that adjunctive vancomycin powder applied directly to the surgical bed before closure seems effective in preventing deep infections that require operative debridement following posterior spine surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbey DM, Turner DM, Warson JS, Wirt TC, Scalley RD (2008) Treatment of postoperative wound infections following spinal fusion with instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 8:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Patient Safety Committee, Evans RP (2009) Surgical site infection prevention and control: an emerging paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 6):2–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calderone RR, Larsen JM (1996) Overview and classification of spinal infections. Orthop Clin N Am 27:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caroom C, Tullar JM, Benton EG Jr, Jones JR, Chaput CD (2013) Intrawound vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections in posterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1183–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Edin ML, Miclau T, Lester GE, Lindsey RW, Dahners LE (1996) Effect of cefazolin and vancomycin on osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2012) Hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) in acute inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) hospitals. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-forServicePayment/HospitalAcqCond/downloads/hacfactsheet.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2013

  7. Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Johnson JR (1996) Salvage of instrumental lumbar fusions complicated by surgical wound infection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2163–2169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horan TC, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Jarvis WR, Edwards JR, Reid CR (1993) Nosocomial infections in surgical patients in the united states, January 1986-June 1992. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 14:73–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanj WW, Flynn JM, Spiegel DA, Dormans JP, Baldwin KD (2013) Vancomycin prophylaxis of surgical site infection in clean orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 36:138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keller RB, Pappas AM (1972) Infection after spinal fusion using internal fixation instrumentation. Orthop Clin N Am 3:99–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirst HA, Thompson DG, Nicas TI (1998) Historical yearly usage of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:1303–1304

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mariappan R, Manninen P, Massicotte EM, Bhatia A (2013) Circulatory collapse after topical application of vancomycin powder during spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 19:381–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Milstone AM, Maragakis LL, Townsend T, Speck K, Sponseller P, Song X, Perl TM (2008) Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis: a modifiable risk factor for deep surgical site infections after pediatric spinal fusion. Pediatr Infect Dis J 27:704–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moise PA, Smyth DS, El-Fawal N, Robinson DA, Holden PN, Forrest A, Sakoulas G (2008) Microbiological effects of prior vancomycin use in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Molinari RW, Khera OA, Molinari WJ 3rd (2012) Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period. Eur Spine J 21:S476–S482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Núñez-Pereira S, Pellisé F, Rodríguez-Pardo D, Pigrau C, Sánchez JM, Bagó J, Villanueva C, Cáceres E (2011) Individualized antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections by gram-negative bacteria in instrumented spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 20:S397–S402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen MA, Mayfield J, Lauryssen C, Polish LB, Jones M, Vest J, Fraser VJ (2003) Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 98:S149–S155

    Google Scholar 

  18. O’Neill KR, Smith JG, Abtahi AM, Archer KR, Spengler DM, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ (2011) Reduced surgical site infections in patients undergoing posterior spinal stabilization of traumatic injuries using vancomycin powder. Spine J 11:641–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pahys JM, Pahys JR, Cho SK, Kang MM, Zebala LP, Hawasli AH, Sweet FA, Lee DH, Riew KD (2013) Methods to decrease postoperative infections following posterior cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:549–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petilon JM, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Carreon LY (2012) Clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion complicated by deep wound infection: a case–control study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1370–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prokuski L (2008) Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:283–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahman R, Lenke L, Bridwell K, Buchowski J, Dickson DD, Aleem A, Sides BA (2011) Intrawound vancomycin powder lowers the acute deep wound infection rate in adult spinal deformity patients. Paper presented at: Scoliosis Research Society 46th Annual Meeting & Course; Sept. 14–17, 2011; Louisville, KY

  23. Rathbone CR, Cross JD, Brown KV, Murray CK, Wenke JC (2011) Effect of various concentrations of antibiotics on osteogenic cell viability and activity. J Orthop Res 29:1070–1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts FJ, Walsh A, Wing P, Dvorak M, Schweigel J (1998) The influence of surveillance methods on surgical wound infection rates in a tertiary care spinal surgery service. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:366–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith JS, Fu KM, Polly DW Jr, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR Jr, Hart RA, Donaldson WF 3rd, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O, Shaffrey CI (2010) Complication rates of three common spine procedures and rates of thromboembolism following spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2140–2149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sponseller PD, Shah SA, Abel MF, Newton PO, Letko L, Marks M (2010) Infection rate after spine surgery in cerebral palsy is high and impairs results: multicenter analysis of risk factors and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:711–716

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Strom RG, Pacione D, Kalhorn SP, Frempong-Boadu AK (2013) Lumbar laminectomy and fusion with routine local application of vancomycin powder: decreased infection rate in instrumented and non-instrumented cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1766–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Strom RG, Pacione D, Kalhorn SP, Frempong-Boadu AK (2013) Decreased risk of wound infection after posterior cervical fusion with routine local application of vancomycin powder. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

  29. Sweet FA, Roh M, Sliva C (2011) Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2084–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Whitmore RG, Stephen J, Stein SC, Campbell PG, Yadla S, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK (2012) Patient comorbidities and complications after spinal surgery: a societal-based cost analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1065–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zebala L, Chuntarapas T, Talcott M, Riew R (2013) Intrawound vancomycin powder prevented bacterial infection in a rabbit spine surgical model. Paper presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; March 19–23, 2013; Chicago, IL

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mary Van Beusekom, ELS, (HealthPartners) for editing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Disclosure

None.

Sources of funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Regions Hospital, 640 Jackson St., St. Paul, MN, 55101, USA

    Brian W. Hill, Osa Emohare & Matthew M. Kang

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN, USA

    Rick Davis

  3. College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Bowei Song

Authors
  1. Brian W. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Osa Emohare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bowei Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rick Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthew M. Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osa Emohare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, B.W., Emohare, O., Song, B. et al. The use of vancomycin powder reduces surgical reoperation in posterior instrumented and noninstrumented spinal surgery. Acta Neurochir 156, 749–754 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2022-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2022-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation